Skip to main content

Digitale Medien für die Unterstützung von Lehr-/Lernprozessen in der Weiterbildung

Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Befunde

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Erwachsenenbildung/Weiterbildung

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften ((SRS))

Zusammenfassung

Digitalen Medien wird eine wichtige Rolle zur Förderung des Lernens im Erwachsenenbildungskontext zugeschrieben. Allerdings werden sie in der Praxis oft nicht auf Basis von Erkenntnissen der Lehr-Lernforschung gestaltet bzw. eingesetzt. In diesem Beitrag werden zunächst wichtige Theorien und Befunde zum Lernen mit digitalen Medien näher beschrieben. Danach stellen wir innovative Instruktionsansätze vor, die einen theoretischen Rahmen für Entwicklung und Einsatz mediengestützter Lehr-Lernszenarien in der Erwachsenenbildung bieten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Bd. 2, S. 89–195). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Cromley, J., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Hrsg.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (S. 453–494). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2013). Computervermittelter Wissensaustausch als Soziales Dilemma: Ein Überblick. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 27(1–2), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology. A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: Identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goeze, A., Zottmann, J. M., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Schrader, J. (2014). Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives? Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education. Instructional Science, 42(1), 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Education Applied, 18(2), 178–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design; some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38, 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning & Instruction, 17(6), 708–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2009). Blended Learning: Forschungsfragen und Perspektiven. In L. J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Hrsg.), Online-Lernen. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis (S. 139–150). München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulcsár, Z., Aboulafia, A., Hall, T., Sabova, D., & Shorten, G. (2007). A qualitative approach to defining learning determinants of spinal anaesthesia. In Euroanaesthesia (ESA), Third annual meeting of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (S. 9–12). München: ESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., Fan, W., & Wallace, L. (2013). The effects of social and technical factors on user satisfaction, sense of belonging and knowledge community usage. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 9(3), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-components instructional design. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MMB. (2014). Individuelles Lernen: Plädoyer für den mündigen Nutzer. Ergebnisse der Trendstudie MMB Learning Delphi 2014. http://www.mmb-institut.de/mmb-monitor/trendmonitor/MMB-Trendmonitor_2014_II.pdf. Zugegriffen am 09.04.2015.

  • Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, F. R., Wang, N., Scull, J., Seher, A., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, H.-R., Mühlpfordt, M., & Müller, W. (2003). Lernprotokollunterstütztes Lernen – ein Vergleich zwischen unstrukturiertem und systemkontrolliertem diskursivem Lernen im Netz. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211(2), 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Cook, M. T. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinmann, G., & Mandl, H. (Hrsg.). (2004). Psychologie des Wissensmanagements. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Gruber, H., Weber, S., Lerche, T., & Schweizer, K. (2003). Cognitive load beim Lernen aus Lösungsbeispielen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17(2), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Cowan, N., Zwilling, C. E., Morey, C. C., & Pratte, M. S. (2008). An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105(16), 5975–5979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runde, A., Bromme, R., & Jucks, R. (2006). Scripting in net-based medical consultation: The impact of external representations on giving advice and explanations. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl & J. M. Haake (Hrsg.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning – Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (S. 57–72). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (S. 97–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwan, S., & Buder, J. (2002). Lernen und Wissenserwerb in Virtuellen Realitäten. In G. Bente (Hrsg.), Digitale Welten. Virtuelle Realität als Gegenstand und Methode der Psychologie (S. 109–132). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, H. (2012). Lernen und Bildung Erwachsener. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sträfling, N., & Krämer, N. C. (2013). Gemeinsam lernen auf Facebook & Co.? Der Einfluss von sozialen und persönlichkeitsbezogenen Aspekten auf die Nutzung von sozialen Medien für den studienrelevanten Austausch. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 44(4), 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of multimedia learning (S. 19–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C.-W., & Shen, P.-D. (2009). Applying web-enabled self-regulated learning and problem-based learning with initiation to involve low-achieving students in learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1189–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, K.-H., Chiang, F. K., & Hsu, W.-H. (2007). Interactive processes and learning attitudes in a web-based problem-based learning (PBL) platform. Computers in human behavior, 24, 940–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wecker, C. (2012). Slide presentations as speech suppressors: When and why learners miss oral information. Computers & Education, 59(2), 260–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, K. (2004). Wissensmanagementprozesse in face-to-face und virtuellen Communities. Kennzeichen, Gestaltungsprinzipien und Erfolgsfaktoren. Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingo Kollar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kollar, I., Fischer, F. (2018). Digitale Medien für die Unterstützung von Lehr-/Lernprozessen in der Weiterbildung. In: Tippelt, R., von Hippel, A. (eds) Handbuch Erwachsenenbildung/Weiterbildung. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19979-5_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19979-5_73

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19978-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19979-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics