Abstract
Discursive practices are used by members of a profession to shape events in the domains subject to their professional scrutiny. The shaping process creates the objects of knowledge that become the insignia of a profession’s craft: the theories, artifacts, and bodies of expertise that distinguish it from other professions. Analysis of the methods used by members of a community to build and contest the events that structure their life world contributes to the development of a practice-based theory of knowledge and action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. by R. Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (Eds.) (1993). Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cicourel, A. V. (1964). Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.
Cicourel, A. V. (1968). The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley.
Dougherty, J. W. D., & Keller, C. (1985). Taskonomy: A Practical Approach to Knowledge Structures. In J. W. D. Dougherty (Ed.), Directions in Cognitive Anthropology (pp. 161–174). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Drew, P. (1992). Contested Evidence in Courtroom Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting (pp. 470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Du Bois, J., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Paolino, D., & Cumming, S. (1993). Outline of Discourse Transcription. In J. A. Edwards, & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding Methods for Language Research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Duranti, A. (1992). Language and Bodies in Social Space: Samoan Ceremonial Greetings. American Anthropologist 94/3, 657–691.
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.) (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edgeworth, M. (1991). The Act of Discovery: An Ethnography of the Subject-Object Relation in Archaeological Practive. Doctoral thesis. Program in Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Durham.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Foucault, M. (1981). The Order of Discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the Text. A Post-Structuralist Reader (pp. 48–78). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goodwin, C. (1990). Perception, Technology and Interaction on a Scientific Research Vessel. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans.
Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent Vision. In E. Ochs, S. Thompson, & E. Schegloff (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C. (1997). The Blackness of Black: Color Categories as Situated Practice. ln L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecarvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition (pp. 111–140). Berlin: Springer.
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanks, W. (1987). Discourse Genres in a Theory of Practice. American Ethnologist 14/4, 668–692.
Haraway, D. (1989). Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hutchins, E. (1993). Learning to Navigate. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context (pp. 35–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keller, C., & Keller, J. D. (1993). Thinking and Acting with Iron. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context (pp. 125–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, P. (1993a). King Case Prosecutors Must Scale Hurdles of History. The Los Angeles Times, February 7, pp. AI, A26.
Liebermann, P. (1993b). King Trial May Come Down to a Case of Expert vs. Expert. The Los Angeles Times, April 4, pp. AI, A32.
Lynch, M. (1985). Art and Artefact in Laboratory Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lynch, M. (1988). The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences. Human Studies 11, 201–234.
Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (Eds.) (1988). Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mydans, S. (1993a). Defendant on Videotape Gives Trial an Odd Air. The New York Times, April 7, p. A14.
Mydans, S. (1993b). Prosecutor in Beating Case Urges Jury to Rely on Tape. The New York Times, April 21, p. A7.
Mydans, S. (1993c). Prosecutor in Officers’ Case Ends with Focus on Beating. The New York Times, April 9, p. A8.
Mydans, S. (1993d). Their Lives Consumed, Los Angeles Officers Await Trial. The New York Times, February 2, p. A10.
Newton, J. (1993a). “I Was Just Trying to Stay Alive,” King Tells Federal jury. The Los Angeles Times, March 10, pp. AI, A16.
Newton, J. (1993b). King jury Sees Key Videotape; Prosecutors Rest. The Los Angeles Times, April 7, pp. AI, A25.
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as Theory. In E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental Pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York: Academic Press.
Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and Language Development: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). “When I Come Down, I’m in a Domain State:” Grammar and Graphic Representation in the Interpretive Activity of Physicists. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 328–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1986). Language Socialization across Cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pickering, A. (1992). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1984). Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. 2 vols. Ed. by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist 70, 1075–1095.
Schieffelin, B. B. (1990). The Give and Take of Everyday Life: Language Socialization of Kaluli Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schieffelin, B. B., & Charlier Doucet, R. (1994). The “Real” Haitian Creole: Ideology, Metalinguistics, and Orthographic Choice. American Ethnologist 21/1, 176–200.
Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language Socialization. In B. J. Siegel, A. R. Beals, & S. A. Tyler (Eds.), Annual Review of Anthropology (pp. 163–246). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc. Sherzer, J., & Woodbury, A. C. (1987). Native American Discourse: Poetics and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shuy, R. (1982). Topics as the Unit of Analysis in a Criminal Law Case. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (pp. 113–126). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, Facts and Femininity. London: Routledge.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Tedlock, D. (1987). Hearing a Voice in an Ancient Text: Quiche Maya Poetics in Performance. In J. Sherzer, & A. C. Woodbury (Eds.), Native American Discourse: Poetics and Rhetoric (pp. 140–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1985). Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Ed. by G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees. Trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodwin, C. (2015). Professional Vision. In: Reh, S., Berdelmann, K., Dinkelaker, J. (eds) Aufmerksamkeit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19381-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19381-6_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19380-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19381-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)