Skip to main content

Remarks on the Old English C-system and the Diachrony of V2

  • Chapter
Language Change and Generative Grammar

Part of the book series: Linguistische Berichte ((LINGB,volume 7))

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to show how the verb-second (V2) pattern of Old English (OE), despite certain striking differences from the usual West Germanic pattern, fits with a general characterisation of the V2 phenomenon developed primarily for the analysis of German. A second goal is to reflect on how V2 may have arisen in the prehistory of English (and other Germanic languages), making inferences on the basis of work on Gothic by Ferraresi (1991), Longobardi (1994) and Kiparsky (1994). The OE data support the general approach to V2 outlined in Roberts & Roussou (1996), as well as a version of the “split-Comp” hypothesis developed by Rizzi (1995). The diachronic discussion extends ideas put forward in Longobardi (1994). A general conclusion of the paper is that the distinction between “residual V2” and “full V2” is a structural one, and an ancient one; as Kiparsky (1994: 162) says “In this respect at least, English is syntactically the most conservative of all the modern Germanic languages”.

Notes

This paper forms part of a joint research project with Anna Roussou on “The Synchrony and Diachrony of Second-Position Effects”, funded by the British Academy (Grant No. APN 2989).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham, W., ed. (1983): On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Battye, A. & I. Roberts, eds. (1994): Clause Structure and Language Change. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bean, M. (1983): The Development of Word Order Patterns in Old English. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  4. den Besten, H. (1983): “On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules”. In: W. Abraham, ed. (1983), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belletti, A. & L. Rizzi, eds. (1996): Parameters and Functional Heads. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brody, M. (1995): Lexico-Logical Form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cardinaletti, A., G. Cinque & G. Giusti, eds. (1988): Constituent Structure: Papers from the 1987 GLOW Conference. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cardinaletti, A. & M. Starke (1994): “The Typology of Structural Deficiency”. Ms. Universities of Geneva and Venice.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carnie, A., E. Pyatt & H. Harley (1994): “The Resurrection? Raising to Comp: Some Evidence from Old Irish”. FLSMS.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chomsky, N. (1986): Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chomsky, N. (1995): The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferraresi, G. (1991): Die Stellung des gotischen Verbs im Licht eines Vergleichs mit dem Althochdeutschen. Tesi di Laurea, University of Venice.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grohmann, K.K. (1995): “Some Remarks on Verb Second and Old English Word Order”. Ms. University of Wales, Bangor.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grohmann, K.K. (1996): “Pronominalisation in the German Mittelfeld: Scrambling and Cliticization?”. BA Dissertation, University of Wales, Bangor.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haider, H. (1988): “Matching Projections”. In: A. Cardinaletti, G. Cinque & G. Giusti, eds. (1988). Hale, K. & S.J. Keyser, eds. (1993): The view from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Halle, M. & A. Marantz (1993): “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection”. In: K. Hale & S.J. Keyser, eds. (1993), 111 —177.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holmberg, A. & C. Platzack (1995): Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jarad, N., ed. (1996): Bangor Research Papers in Linguistics, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kayne, R. (1994): The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Kemenade, A. (1987): Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Kemenade, A. & N. Vincent, eds. (to appear): Inflection and Syntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kiparsky, P. (1994): “Indo-European Origins of Germanic Syntax”. In: A. Battye & I. Roberts, eds. (1994), 140 —170.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lehmann, W. (1993): Theoretical Bases of Indo-European Linguistics. London: Routledge. Longobardi, G. ( 1978 ): Problemi di sintassi gotica. Aspetti teorici e descrittivi. MA Dissertation, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Longobardi, G. (1994): “La posizione del verbo gotico”. In: Miscellanea di studi linguistici in onore di Walter Belardi, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lunt, H.G., ed. (1964): Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Manzini, M.-R. (1996): “From Merge and Move to Form Dependency”. Talk given at the 19th GLOW Colloquium, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pintzuk, S. (1992): Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Platzack, C. (1987): “The Scandinavian Languages and the Null-Subject Parameter”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 377 — 401.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pollock, J.-Y. (1989): “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365 — 424.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rivero, M.-L. (to appear): In: A. van Kemenade & N. Vincent, eds. (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rizzi, L. (1995): “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. Ms. University of Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rizzi, L. (1996): “Residual Verb Second and the WH-Criterion”. In: A. Belletti & L. Rizzi, eds.

    Google Scholar 

  33. — 90.Originally published as University of Geneva Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics, 2, 1991].

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rizzi, L. & I. Roberts (1996): “Complex Inversion in French”. In: A. Belletti & L. Rizzi, eds. (1996), 91 — 116. [Originally published in Probus 1, 1 — 39].

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts, I. (1992): Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Roberts, I. (in progress): “VSO and the Licensing of Subjects”. Ms. University of Wales, Bangor. Roberts, I. & A. Roussou (1996): “Speculations on V2”. In: N. Jarad, ed. (1996), Bangor Research Papers in Linguistics, 7, 48 — 61.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rohrbacher, B. (1994): The Germanic VO Languages and the Full Paradigm: A Theory of V to I Raising. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schwartz, B. & S. Vikner (1996) “The Verb Always Leaves IP in V2 Clauses”. In: A. Belletti & L. Rizzi, eds. (1996), 11 — 62.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Thiersch, C. (1978): Topics in German Syntax. PhD Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tomaselli, A. (1989): La sintassi del verbo finito nelle lingue germaniche. PhD Dissertation, University of Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tomaselli, A. (1994): “Cases of V3 in Old High German”. In: A. Battye & I. Roberts, eds. (1994), 345 – 369.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Travis, L. (1984): Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD Dissertation, MIT. Vikner, S. ( 1994 ): Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vikner, S. (1995): “V-to-I Movement and Inflection for Person in all Tenses”. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 55, 1 – 27.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Watkins, C. (1963): “Preliminaries to the Historical and Comparative Analysis of the Syntax of the Old Irish Verb”. Celtica 6, 11 – 49.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Watkins, C. (1964): “Preliminiaries to the Reconstruction of the Indo-European Sentence Structure”. In: H.G. Lunt, ed. (1964), 1035 – 1042.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zwart, J.-W. (1993): Dutch Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. PhD Dissertation, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roberts, I. (1996). Remarks on the Old English C-system and the Diachrony of V2. In: Brandner, E., Ferraresi, G. (eds) Language Change and Generative Grammar. Linguistische Berichte, vol 7. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90776-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90776-9_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12857-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-90776-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics