Abstract
Spinal pain is a common disabling condition, that may often involve healthy individuals as well, for which many people seek medical attention in their lifetime; most of the times, it is an occasional condition which tends to limit itself, but in some cases, radiological investigations may be indicated to reach a certain diagnosis. Spinal pain (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar) can afflict both young and adult people, being an important cause of disability, in particular for working population. Several risk factors have been identified such as physical, occupational, and environmental ones, but also daily habits may be triggering for pain onset and maintenance. Many treatment options have been proposed for the management of spinal pain, i.e., analgesic medications, manipulative treatments, percutaneous interventional procedures, and surgical approaches as well. In this chapter they will be discussing several conditions which may be indicated as the main causes of pain; among these, degenerative disease is surely one of the most important sources of pain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Manusov EG. Evaluation and diagnosis of low back pain. Prim Care Clin Office Pract. 2012;39:471–9.
Maus T. Imaging the Back Pain Patient. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21:725–66.
Patrick N, Emanski E, Knaub MA. Acute and chronic low back pain. Med Clin N Am. 2016;100:169–81.
Kleinman N, Patel AA, Benson C, Macario A, Kim M, Biondi DM. Economic burden of back and neck pain: effect of a neuropathic component. Popul Health Manag. 2014;17(4):224–32.
Costa-Black KM, Loisel P, Anema JR, Pransky G. Back pain and work. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014;24(2):227–40.
Parkin-Smith GF, Amorin-Woods LG, Davies SJ, Losco BE, Adams J. Spinal pain: current understanding, trends, and the future of care. J Pain Res. 2015;8:741–52.
Muto M, Giurazza F, Guarnieri G, Izzo R, Diano A. Neuroimaging of spinal instability. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016;24(3):485–94.
Amirdelfan K, McRoberts P, Deer TR. The differential diagnosis of low back pain: a primer on the evolving paradigm. Neuromodulation. 2014;17:11–7.
Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0. Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J. 2014;14:2525–45.
Izzo R, Popolizio T, D’Aprile P, Muto M. Spinal pain. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(5):746–56.
Dudli S, Fields AJ, Samartzis D, Karppinen J, Lotz JC. Pathobiology of Modic changes. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(11):3723–34.
Kotsenas AL. Imaging of posterior element axial pain generators: facet joints, pedicles, spinous processes, sacroiliac joints, and transitional segments. Radiol Clin N Am. 2012;50(4):705–30.
Donnally CJ III, Dulebohn SC. Lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. In:StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2017.
Jurik AG. Imaging the spine in arthritis—a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:177–91.
Garlaschi G, Satragno L, Silvestri E, La Paglia E. Rachide infiammatorio non infettivo. In: Martino F, Leone A, editors. Imaging del rachide - il vecchio e il nuovo. Milano: Springer-Verlag; 2008.
Mattar M, Salonen D, Inman RD. Imaging of spondyloarthropathies. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2013;39:645–67.
Leone A, Marino M, Dell’Atti C, Zecchi V, Magarelli N, Colosimo C. Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36(10):1335–46.
Anandarajah A. Imaging in psoriatic arthritis. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol. 2013;44:157–65.
Diehn FE. Imaging of spine infection. Radiol Clin N Am. 2012;50:777–98.
Duarte RM, Vaccaro AR. Spinal infection: state of the art and management algorithm. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2787–99.
DeSanto J, Ross JS. Spine infection/inflammation. Radiol Clin N Am. 2011;49:105–27.
Kaya S, Ercan S, Kaya S, Aktas U, Kamasak K, Ozalp H, Cinar K, Duymus R, Boyaci MG, Akkoyun N, Eskazan AE, Temiz H. Spondylodiscitis: evaluation of patients in a tertiary hospital. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8(10):1272–6.
Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994;3:184–201.
Ruiz Santiago F, Tomás Muñoz P, Moya Sánchez E, Revelles Paniza M, Martínez Martínez A, Pérez Abela AL. Classifying thoracolumbar fractures: role of quantitative imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016;6(6):772–84.
Guglielmi G, Muscarella S, Bazzocchi A. Integrated imaging approach to osteoporosis: state-of-the-art review and update. Radiographics. 2011;31:1343–64.
Cicala D, Briganti F, Casale L, Rossi C, Cagini L, Cesarano E, Brunese L, Giganti M. Atraumatic vertebral compression fractures: differential diagnosis between benign osteoporotic and malignant fractures by MRI. Musculoskelet Surg. 2013;97(Suppl 2):S169–79.
Jung HS, Jee WH, McCauley TR, et al. Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging. Radiographics. 2003;23:179–87.
Sözen T, Özışık L, Başaran NC. An overview and management of osteoporosis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2017;4:46–56.
Griffith JF. Identifying osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015;5(4):592–602.
Erlemann R. Imaging and differential diagnosis of primary bone tumors and tumor-like lesions of the spine. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:48–67.
Orguc S, Arkun R. Primary tumors of the spine. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18:280–99.
Wald JT. Imaging of spine neoplasm. Radiol Clin N Am. 2012;50:749–76.
Sung JK, Jee WH, Jung JY, Choi M, Lee SY, Kim YH, Ha KY, Park CK. Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures of the spine: use of additive qualitative and quantitative axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology. 2014;271(2):488–98.
Merhemic Z, Stosic-Opincal T, Thurnher MM. Neuroimaging of spinal tumors. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016;24(3):563–79.
Beall DP, Googe DJ, Emery RL, Thompson DB, Campbell SE, Ly JQ, DeLone D, Smirniotopoulos J, Lisanti C, Currie TJ. Extramedullary intradural spinal tumors: a pictorial review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2007;36(5):185–98.
Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9(7):545–50.
Middleton K, Fish DE. Lumbar spondylosis: clinical presentation and treatment approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009;2(2):94–104.
Melancia JL, Francisco AF, Antunes JL. Spinal stenosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;119:541–9.
Deasy J. Acquired lumbar spinal stenosis. JAAPA. 2015;28(4):19–23.
Becker JA, Stumbo JR, et al. Prim Care Clin Office Pract. 2013;40:271–88.
Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physician. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):514–30.
Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(17):1873–8.
Joaquim AF, Appenzeller S. Cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis--a systematic review. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(12):1195–202.
Clark CR, Goetz DD, Menezes AH. Arthrodesis of the cervical spine in rheumatoid patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:381–92.
Riew KD, Hilibrand AS, Palumbo MA, Sethi N, Bohlman HH. Diagnosing basilar invagination in the rheumatoid patient. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(2):194–200.
Ranawat CS, O’Leary P, Pellicci P, Tsairis P, Marchisello P, Dorr L. Cervical spine fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(7):1003–10.
Sudoł-Szopinska I, Urbanik A. Diagnostic imaging of sacroiliac joints and the spine in the course of spondyloarthropathies. Pol J Radiol. 2013;78(2):43–9.
Bazzocchi A, Aparisi Gómez MP, Guglielmi G. Conventional radiology in spondyloarthritis. Radiol Clin N Am. 2017;55(5):943–66.
Baraliakos X, Coates LC, Braun J. The involvement of the spine in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33(93):S31–5.
Porter GG. Psoriatic arthritis. Plain radiology and other imaging techniques. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1994;8(2):465–82.
Márquez Sánchez P. Espondilodiscitis. Radiologia. 2016;58(S1):50–9.
Prodi E, Grassi R, Iacobellis F, Cianfoni A. Imaging in spondylodiskitis. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016;24(3):581–600.
Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8(9):1137–48.
Freedman BA, Heller JG. Kummel disease: a not-so-rare complication of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(1):75–8.
Biffar A, Sourbron S, Dietrich O, Duerr HR, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:298–303.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
8.1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Right lateral disc herniation on transversal T2-wi (a). On transversal images it can be noticed the annual disc tear where it takes origin. (MOV 3784 kb)
Sagittal fat sat T2-wi (b). On transversal images it can be noticed the annual disc tear where it takes origin. (MOV 2150 kb)
Sagittal T1-wi (c) craniallymigrated. On transversal images it can be noticed the annual disc tear where it takes origin. (MOV 2417 kb)
Spinal stenosis. MRI examination on transversal T2-wi (a) shows multilevel degenerative zygoapophyseal joint changes, ligamentum flavum hypetrophy, and disc herniation. Pseudoanterolysthesis of L5 on S1 and anterior L5 collapse are also noticed. (MOV 1913 kb)
Spinal stenosis. Sagittal T1-wi (b) shows multilevel degenerative zygoapophyseal joint changes, ligamentum flavum hypetrophy, and disc herniation. Pseudoanterolysthesis of L5 on S1 and anterior L5 collapse are also noticed. (MOV 1389 kb)
Spinal stenosis. T2-wi (c) shows multilevel degenerative zygoapophyseal joint changes, ligamentum flavum hypetrophy, and disc herniation. Pseudoanterolysthesis of L5 on S1 and anterior L5 collapse are also noticed. (MOV 1411 kb)
MRI features of Modic changes. Transversal T2-wi (a). Type I modification represents bone edema and appears hyperintense on T2-wi, better evaluated using FS, as in L4 anterosuperiorior aspect. Type II modification appears hyperintense on both T1-w and T2-wi as a consequence of fat infiltration (as in the superior L5 endplate). (MOV 4148 kb)
MRI features of Modic changes. Sagittal fat sat T2-wi (b). Type I modification represents bone edema and appears hyperintense on T2-wi, better evaluated using FS, as in L4 anterosuperiorior aspect. Type II modification appears hyperintense on both T1-w and T2-wi as a consequence of fat infiltration (as in the superior L5 endplate). (MOV 1818 kb)
MRI features of Modic changes. T1-wi (c). Type I modification represents bone edema and appears hyperintense on T2-wi, better evaluated using FS, as in L4 anterosuperiorior aspect. Type II modification appears hyperintense on both T1-w and T2-wi as a consequence of fat infiltration (as in the superior L5 endplate). (MOV 1597 kb)
MRI features of Modic changes. T2-wi (d). Type I modification represents bone edema and appears hyperintense on T2-wi, better evaluated using FS, as in L4 anterosuperiorior aspect. Type II modification appears hyperintense on both T1-w and T2-wi as a consequence of fat infiltration (as in the superior L5 endplate). (MOV 1922 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, which is caused by bilateral L4 pars interarticularis lysis, as well documented on CT transversal images (a, bone filter). (MOV 2248 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, which is caused by bilateral L4 pars interarticularis lysis, as well documented on CT transversal images (b, soft tissue filter). (MOV 2311 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, as documented in the MRI exam (c, transversal T1-wi). (MOV 392 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, on MPR reconstructions (d, coronal bone filter). (MOV 589 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, on MPR reconstructions (e, coronal soft tissue filter). (MOV 1605 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, as documented in the MRI exam (f, coronal T2-wi). (MOV 482 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, on MPR reconstructions (g, sagittal bone filter). (MOV 1013 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, as documented in the MRI exam (h, sagittal fat sat T2-wi). (MOV 389 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, as documented in the MRI exam (i, sagittal T1-wi). (MOV 224 kb)
Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, as documented in the MRI exam (j, sagittal T2-wi). (MOV 335 kb)
Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis. The infectous process appear as hypointense on T1-wi (a, sagittal). (WMV 1447 kb)
Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis. Hyperintense on T2-wi (b). (WMV 1486 kb)
Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis. The infectous process appear as hypointense on T1-wi (c, transversal). (WMV 2119 kb)
Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis. Intense CE is noticed on fat sat T1-wi after iv Gd contrast agent (d, sagittal). (WMV 1580 kb)
Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis. Intense CE is noticed on fat sat T1-wi after iv Gd contrast agent (e, transversal). (WMV 2369 kb)
Spine lung metastasis involving L4 vertebral body, which is fractured, eith intracanalar spread. Lesion appear hypointense on T1-wi (a; due to normal bone marrow sostitution). Other lesions are present at L1, L3, S1 and S3. (MOV 130 kb)
Spine lung metastasis involving L4 vertebral body, which is fractured, eith intracanalar spread. Lesion appear hypointense on T1-wi (b; due to normal bone marrow sostitution). Other lesions are present at L1, L3, S1 and S3. (MOV 244 kb)
Spine lung metastasis involving L4 vertebral body, which is fractured, eith intracanalar spread. Lesion appear hypointense on T1-wi (b; due to normal bone marrow sostitution). Other lesions are present at L1, L3, S1 and S3. (MOV 244 kb)
Spine lung metastasis involving L4 vertebral body, which is fractured, eith intracanalar spread. Disomogeneous on T2-wi (c). Other lesions are present at L1, L3, S1 and S3. (MOV 219 kb)
Spine lung metastasis involving L4 vertebral body, which is fractured, eith intracanalar spread. Disomogeneous on T2-wi (d). Other lesions are present at L1, L3, S1 and S3. (MOV 178 kb)
Multiple myeloma; diffuse vertebral spine involvement. T1-wi show typical "salt and pepper" appearance, better than T2-wi (a). T12 patological collapse is also present. (MOV 681 kb)
Multiple myeloma; diffuse vertebral spine involvement. T1-wi show typical "salt and pepper" appearance, better than T2-wi (b). T12 patological collapse is also present. (MOV 275 kb)
Multiple myeloma; diffuse vertebral spine involvement. T1-wi (c) show typical "salt and pepper" appearance, better than T2-wi. T12 patological collapse is also present. (MOV 396 kb)
Multiple myeloma; diffuse vertebral spine involvement. T1-wi show typical "salt and pepper" appearance, better than T2-wi (d). T12 patological collapse is also present. (MOV 189 kb)
Multiple myeloma; diffuse vertebral spine involvement. T1-wi (e) show typical "salt and pepper" appearance, better than T2-wi. T12 patological collapse is also present. (MOV 235 kb)
Multiple myeloma; diffuse vertebral spine involvement. T1-wi show typical "salt and pepper" appearance, better than T2-wi (f). T12 patological collapse is also present. (MOV 334 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balzano, R.F., Guglielmi, G. (2019). Imaging of Spine Pain. In: Cova, M., Stacul, F. (eds) Pain Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99822-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99822-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99821-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99822-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)