Skip to main content

Understanding the Extent of and Factors Involved in the Use of YouTube as an Informal Learning Tool by 11- to 13-Year-Old Children

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Technologies and Learning (ICITL 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11003))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Web 2.0 technology has changed the way and setting where learning takes place. This study has attempted to contribute to the understanding of how children, aged 11 to 13 can use YouTube as an informal learning tool. This was accomplished by conducting four focused groups consisting of children aged 11 to 13. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the interview data. The data has revealed that children use YouTube as home and at school (limited). They had multiple methods of access, although was constrained by parental control and limited by restricted data. The children further experienced two types of informal learning, self-directed and incidental. Interestingly, they did distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate content. Cognitively, they displayed low levels of self-regulation but were extremely self-efficient. Children had high expectations that there is entertainment on YouTube, and that resulted in them constantly using YouTube to entertain themselves. Finally, through observational learning, the children not only learnt how to use YouTube but they also acquired different skills from watching YouTube videos. These findings enhance the current understanding of the role YouTube can play in learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stodd, J.: Exploring the Social Age and the New Culture of Learning, UK, September 2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sefton-Green, J.: Literature Review in Informal Learning with Technology. futurelab series, Bristol (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yaşar, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş.: The power of social media in informal learning. Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts, pp. 531–538 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eshach, H.: Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: formal, non-formal, and informal education. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 16(2), 171–189 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marsick, V.J., Watkins, K.: Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace. Routledge, Oxon (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharples, M., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Logan, K.: E-Safety and Web2.0 for children aged 11–16. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 25, 70–84 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hattingh, M.: A preliminary investigation of the appropriateness of youtube as an informal learning platform for pre-teens. In: Xie, H., Popescu, E., Hancke, G., Fernández Manjón, B. (eds.) ICWL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10473, pp. 101–110. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66733-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Mao, J.: Social media for learning: a mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 33, 213–223 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenhow, C., Lewin, C.: Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learn. Media Technol. 41(1), 6–30 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Asian J. Psychol. 52(1), 21–41 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stefanone, M.A., Lackaff, D., Rosen, D.: The relationship between traditional mass media and “Social Media”: reality television as a model for social network site behavior. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 54(3), 508–525 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A.: A social cognitive theory perspective on individual reactions to computing technology. In: International Conference on Information Systems (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Song, D., Lee, J.: Has Web 2.0 revitalized informal learning? The relationship between Web 2.0 and informal learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 30, 511–533 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoo, S.J., Kim, S.: How and why college students use Web 2.0 applications. Int. J. Web Based Communities 9(2), 174–186 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burlington, C.: How Does Digital Literacy Mediate Informal Learning on YouTube? (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pilz, M., Wilmshöfer, S.: Formal, nonformal, and informal learning in rural India: The case of fishing families on the Chilika Lagoon (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siemens, G.: Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Dist. Learn., 1–100 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, B., Bryer, T.: Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 13(1), 87–104 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers, A.: The classroom and the everyday: the importance of informal learning for formal learning. Investigar em Educação (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schugurensky, D.: The forms of informal learning: towards a conceptualization of the field (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gikas, J., Grant, M.M.: Mobile computing devices in higher education: student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet High. Educ. 19, 18–26 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yakin, I., Gencel, I.E.: The utilization of social media tools for informal learning activities: a survey study. Mevlana Int. J. Educ. 3(4), 108–117 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dabbagh, N., Kitsantas, A.: Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High. Educ. 15(1), 3–8 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Latchem, C.: Informal learning and non-formal education for development. J. Learn. Dev. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B.: Old communication, new literacies: social network sites as social learning resources. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 14, 1130–1161 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clifton, A., Mann, C.: Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Educ. Today 31(4), 311–313 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baumer, S.: Digital Youth Research, 06 February 2018. http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/node/49

  28. Tan, E.: Informal learning on YouTube: exploring digital literacy in independent online learning. Learn. Media Technol. J. 38(4), 463–477 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Myers, M.D.: Qualitative Research in Business & Management. Sage, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rabiee, F.: Focus-group interview and data analysis. In: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, pp. 655–660 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferguson, C.J.: Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior, and academic performance. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5(10), 646–666 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Downes, S.: Places to go: YouTube. Innovate J. Online Educ. 4(5) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. KnockKnockMargeting. 12 Popular types of Video Content on YouTube (2017). https://knockknockmarketing.com/2017/08/04/12-popular-types-of-video-content-on-youtube/. Accessed 23 Mar 2018

  35. O’Keeffe, G.S., Clarke-Pearson, K.: The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bloom, K., Johnston, K.M.: Digging into YouTube videos: using media literacy and participatory culture to promote cross-cultural understanding. J. Media Literacy Educ. 2(2), 113–123 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kritzinger, E.: Online safety in South Africa - A Cause for Growing Concern. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Neliswa Dyosi or Marie Hattingh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dyosi, N., Hattingh, M. (2018). Understanding the Extent of and Factors Involved in the Use of YouTube as an Informal Learning Tool by 11- to 13-Year-Old Children. In: Wu, TT., Huang, YM., Shadiev, R., Lin, L., Starčič, A. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11003. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99737-7_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99737-7_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99736-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99737-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics