Skip to main content

Digital Workers in Service Systems: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Service Science, Volume II

Abstract

Early forms of AI systems (digital workers), from cognitive assistants to driverless vehicles, are beginning to appear in service systems, creating challenges and opportunities. Meanwhile, people (smarter workers) with an affinity for using advanced technologies are getting things done in new ways. Working scenarios today are guided by high resonant collaboration and wide spread knowledge communication among professionals. To analyze this scenario, we combine both a traditional analytical approach (focus on the parts) and a holistic approach (focus on the whole), privileging a transdisciplinary perspective based on the three frameworks: SSME+DAPP, VSA and IAD. This chapter aims to analyze the challenges and opportunities of digital workers coming to service systems, and provide recommendations for individuals, managers, policymaker, and academics. To mitigate the challenges and seize the opportunities, a wide range of professionals are transforming themselves into T-shaped adaptive innovators in Smart Working environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ahuja et al. (2007) show an increase in worker productivity, which thanks to greater autonomy and involvement increases work performance by 50% and, if combined with the reduction of overtime and absenteeism, leads accordingly to a significant reduction in labor costs. Nauert (2011) believes that the company Smart, by giving staff the possibility to choose where and when work, makes the employee satisfied, increase engagement and productivity.

References

  • Adecco (2015). Discover the future of social recruiting and smartworking. Work Trends Study. Retrieved from http://englishbulletin.adapt.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Adecco-Work-Trends-Study-2015.pdf

  • Arthur WB (2017) Where is technology taking the future? McKinsey Quarterly. October 1, 2017 URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/where-is-technology-taking-the-economy

  • Ahuja, M. K., Chudoba, K. M., Kacmar, C. J., McKnight, D. H., & George, J. F. (2007). ICT Road Warriors: Balancing Work-Family Conflict, Job Autonomy, and Work Overload to Mitigate Turnover Intentions. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine, N. R. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakar, M. S., Ramli, A. B., Ibrahim, N. A., & Muhammad, I. G. (2017). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy dimensions and higher education institution performance. IJMS, 24(1), 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S. (2009a). Viable System Management. Giappichelli, Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S. (2009b) The dynamic of information varieties in the processes of decision making, contributo in the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Generation, Communication and Management: KGCM 2009 in the context of The 13th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics: WMSCI 2009 July 10th - 13th, 2009 – Orlando, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., Calabrese, M., Polese, F., Saviano, M. (2013a), The Government of Complex Systems Between Current Competences and Potential Capabilities, in Barile, S., Eletti, V., Matteuzzi, M. (Ed.), (n.d.) Decisions and choices in complex contexts, Cedam-Kluwer, Lavis, pp. 261–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., Carrubbo, L., Iandolo, F., Caputo, F. (2013b). From ‘EGO’ to ‘ECO’ in B2B relationships. Journal of Business Market Management, 6(4), 228–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., Franco, G., Nota, G., Saviano, M. (2012a). Structure and dynamics of a “T-Shaped” knowledge: From individuals to cooperating communities of practice. Service Science, 4(2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., Polese, F. (2010). Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Service Science, 2(1–2), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., Polese, F., Calabrese, M., Iandolo, F., & Carrubbo, L. (2013c). A theoretical framework for measuring value creation based on Viable Systems Approach (VSA) in Barile, S. (Ed.), Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management, Viable Systems Approach, ARACNE Editrice, Roma, 2013, ISBN 978-88-548-6082-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., & Saviano, M. (2010). A new perspective of systems complexity in service science., in Impresa, Ambiente, Management, 3,3, pp.369–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., & Saviano, M. (2011). Foundation of systems thinking: the structure-system paradigm

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., & Saviano, M. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities and T-shaped Knowledge: A Viable Systems Approach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., Saviano, M., Polese, F., & Di Nauta, P. (2012b). The Firm-Territory Relationship between Local Efficiency, Context Effectiveness and Environmental Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the firm. The managerial cybernetics of organization. The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, G. D. (2002). Management strategies for individual knowledge and organizational knowledge. Journal of knowledge management, 6(1), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, A. S., & Smith, R. D. (2001). Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset. Journal of knowledge management, 5(1), 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorsma, B., & Mitchell S. (2011) Work-life innovation, smart work- paradigm shift transforming: how, where, and when work gets done, San Jose, CA, Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG), retrieved April 30, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, A. M. (2000). Work design for flexible work scheduling: Barriers and gender implications. Gender, Work & Organization, 7(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIPD (2008) Smart Working: The Impact of Work Organisation and Job Design. Wimbledon: Charter Institute of Personell and Development (CIPD).

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPD (2014a) Labour market outlook: summer 2014 [online]. Quarterly survey report. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Available at: http://www.cipd. co.uk/hr-resources/surveyreports/labour-market-outlooksummer-2014.aspx [Accessed 13 October 2014]. Charter Institute of Personell and Development (CIPD).

  • CIPD. (2014b) Landing transformational change. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Available at: http://www.cipd. co.uk/hr-resources/research/transformational-change.aspx [Accessed 13 October 2014]. Charter Institute of Personell and Development (CIPD).

  • CIPD (2014c) Hr: getting Smart about agile working, London, Charter Institute of Personell and Development (CIPD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciolfi, L., Bartolucci, I., & Murphy, D. (2005, September). Meaningful interactions for meaningful places: investigating the relationships between nomadic work, tangible artefacts and the physical environment. In Proceedings of the 2005 annual conference on European association of cognitive ergonomics (pp. 115–121). University of Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapperton, G. and Vanhoutte, P. (2014) The Smarter Working Manifesto. When, where and how do you work best? 1st ed. Oxford: Sunmakers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. J., Augusto, J. C., Jakkula, V. R. (2009). Ambient Intelligence: Technologies, applications, and opportunities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5(4), 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Sue E.S., and Elinor Ostrom. (2005). A Grammar of Institutions. In Understanding Institutional Diversity, Elinor Ostrom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 137–74. Originally published in American Political Science Review 89 (3) (1995): 582–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2012). The digital workplace: Think, share, do: Transform your employee experience. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/mx/Documents/humancapital/The_digital_workplace.pdf

  • Demirkan, H., Bess, C., Spohrer, J., Rayes, A., Allen, D., Kamp; Moghaddam, Y. (2015). Innovations with Smart Service Systems: Analytics, Big Data, Cognitive Assistance, and the Internet of Everything. CAIS, 37, 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donofrio, N., Sanchez, C., & Spohrer, J. (2009). Collaborative Innovation and Service Systems: Implications for Institutions and Disciplines, in Grasso D., (Ed) Holistic Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donofrio, N., Spohrer, J., Zadeh, H. S., Demirkan, H (2018). Driven medical education and practice: A case for T-shaped professionals. In Eds. Moghaddam, Demirkan, Spohrer, T-Shaped Professional: Adaptive Innovators. Business Expert Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducatel, K., Bogdanowicz, M., Scapolo, F., Leijten, J., Burgelman, J. C. (2001). Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010 (pp. 3–8). Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durward, D., Blohm, I., &Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Crowd work. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(4), 281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, M., & Parmentola, A. (2015). The University-Driven LISs. In The Creation of Local Innovation Systems in Emerging Countries (pp. 91–114). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10440- 9.

  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment. How susceptible are jobs to computerisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2003). Changing times: Work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golinelli GM (2010) Viable Systems Approach (VSA): Governing Business Dynamics (CEDAM, Padova, Italy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Golinelli G.M. and Bassano C. (2012). Human resources for governing business dynamics. The Viable Systems Approach, The 1stInternational Conference on the Human Side of Service Engineering, San Francisco, Hotel Hilton, July 23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson E (2010) Personal communication, March 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley AH (1986) Human Ecology: A Theoretical Essay (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacono G. (2013), Smart Knowledge Working, Milan, Digitpub

    Google Scholar 

  • IfM and IBM (2008). Succeeding Through Service Innovation: A Service Perspective for Education. Research, Business, and Government. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSIP/NSF Workshop (2017). Industry-Academe research partnerships to enable the human-technology frontier for next generation smarter service system. J. Spohrer (2017) Engineering Robots to live In and learn with: towards smarter/wiser Service Systems, San Jose, CA, March 29, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwano, K., &Motegi, T. (2015). Wisdom computing: toward creative collaboration between humans and machines. J. Inf. Pro. Manag, 58, 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B., & Olaisen, J. (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management. International journal of information management, 19(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. J. (2005). Developing global leaders: Enhancing competencies and accelerating the expatriate experience. Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2013). Cross-disciplinary knowledge: desperate call from business enterprises in coming smart working era. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(sup1), S285-S303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F., Murnane, R. J. (2004). The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, L., Moxham, C., Jones, B., & Miles, I. (2010). Innovation and Skills‖. Handbook of Service Science, Springer, 717–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavrommati, I., and Darzentas, J. (2006). An overview of AmI from a User Centered Designperspective. IET Proceedings of IE06, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, A. M. (2016). Smart working: Creating the next wave. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrass, V., Li, M. M., & Peters, C. (2017). Towards a Taxonomy of Digital Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. (1996). City of bits: space, place, and the infobahn. MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauert, R., (2011). Worker Autonomy Can Lead to Greater Productivity, Satisfaction. [Online] Available at: http://psychcentral.com

  • Nonaka, I. (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation’, Organization Science, Vol. 5, pp. 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1997). The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2007). A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 15181–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic sytems. Prize Lecture, December 8, Aula Magna, Stockholm University, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrício, L., Fisk, R. P., Falcão e Cunha, J., & Constantine, L. (2011). Multilevel service design: from customer value constellation to service experience blueprinting. Journal of Service Research, 14(2), 180–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piciocchi, P., Bassano, C., Paduano, E., & Galvin, M. (2011). The Viable Systems Approach (VSA) for Re-interpreting Network Business Dynamics. Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, 304–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piciocchi P, Saviano M, Bassano C (2009) Network creativity to reduce strategic ambiguity inturbulent environments: A viable systems approach (vSa). 11th Internat. Conf. Global Bus. Econom. Development, Proc. Internat. Conf., Vol. 3 (University of Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piciocchi, P., Spohrer, J.C., Martuscelli, L., Pietronudo, M.C., Scocozza, M., & Bassano C. (2017). T-Shape Professionals Co-working in Smart Contexts: VEGA(ST) – Venice Gateway for Science and Technology. In Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on The Human Side of Service Engineering, (Vol. 601, pp 178–190), Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politecnico di Milano (2012) Smart Working; rethinking work, releasing energy. Report Smart WorkingObservatory, Milan; Politecnico di Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, G., Kirda, E., Gall, H., Picco, G. P., Cugola, G., & Fenkam, P. (2001). A web-based peer-to-peer architecture for collaborative nomadic working. In Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2001. WET ICE 2001. Proceedings. Tenth IEEE International Workshops on (pp. 334–339). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse WB, Spohrer JC (2018) Automating versus augmenting intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Transformation. 7:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarti, D., & Torre, T. (2017). Is Smart Working a Win-Win Solution? First Evidence from the Field. Well-being at and through Work, 9, 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviano, M., Caputo, F., Formisano, V., Walletzký, L. (2016). “From theory to practice in systems studies: a focus on Smart Cities”. In 4rd International Symposium Advances in Business Management. “Towards Systemic Approach”, Mikolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lituania, 24–26 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena M. (2016). Transforming Human Resource practices through technology. Damascius International Interdisciplinary Journal, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, J. H. (2003). Mobile communications. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiki, Saba, Christopher M. Weible, Xavier Basurto, and John Calanni. (2011). Dissecting Policy Designs: An Application of the Institutional Grammar Tool. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J.(2016). Innovation for jobs with cognitive assistants: A service science perspective. InNordfors, D., Cerf, V., Senges, M. (eds.) Disrupting Unemployment: Reflections on Sustainable Middle Class Economic Recovery. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., & Banavar, G. (2015). Cognition as a service: an industry perspective. AI Magazine, 36(4), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Bassano, C., Piciocchi, P., & Siddike, M. A. K. (2017). What Makes a System Smart? Wise?. In Advances in The Human Side of Service Engineering (pp. 23–34). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Golinelli, G. M., Piciocchi, P., & Bassano, C. (2010). An integrated SS-VSA analysis of changing job roles. Service Science, 2(1–2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., & Kwan, S. K. (2009). Service science, management, engineering, and design (SSMED): an emerging discipline--outline and references. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 1(3), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2010a). Service science: Toward a smarter planet. Introduction to service engineering, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer J, Maglio PP (2010b) Toward a science of service systems: Value and symbols. Maglio PP, Kieliszewski CA, Spohrer JC, eds. Handbook of Service Science (Springer, New York), 157–196.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Piciocchi, P., & Bassano, C. (2012). Three frameworks for service research: exploring multilevel governance in nested, networked systems. Service Science, 4(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Piciocchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Piciocchi, P., Bassano, C., Pietronudo, M.C., Spohrer, J.C. (2019). Digital Workers in Service Systems: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Maglio, P.P., Kieliszewski, C.A., Spohrer, J.C., Lyons, K., Patrício, L., Sawatani, Y. (eds) Handbook of Service Science, Volume II. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98512-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics