Abstract
As one of the five major personality traits, openness to experience has been established as a fundamental factor of personality. Yet its history, and what it constitutes, has not always been clear. This becomes obvious when observing how the label has changed over the decades: from Inquiring Intellect to Intelligence to Culture until finally the consensus of Openness to Experience. This final connotation denotes people who are flexible and receptive to all experiential possibilities. It is this flexibility that perhaps most defines open people and enables them to be creative, establish complex worldviews, and probe the depths of human experience. Therefore, open people not only see more possibilities but also engage with them. This chapter starts with a brief review of the history of openness to experience that leads into contemporary conceptualizations. It then moves on to discussing research on the trait’s associations with cognitive, perceptual, and behavioral outcomes. Finally, specific emphasis is placed on types of experience and how these may vary depending on people’s characteristics of openness to experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
Antinori, A., Carter, O. L., & Smillie, L. D. (2017). Seeing it both ways: Openness to experience and binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.03.005.
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barford, K. A., Fayn, K., Silvia, P. J., & Smillie, L. D. (2018). Individual differences in conflicting stimulus evaluations: Openness/Intellect predicts mixed-valenced appraisals of visual art. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.006.
Barford, K. A., & Smillie, L. D. (2016). Openness and other Big Five traits in relation to dispositional mixed emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.002.
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5, 10964. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10964.
Beaty, R. E., Chen, Q., Christensen, A. P., Qiu, J., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2018). Brain networks of the imaginative mind: Dynamic functional connectivity of default and cognitive control networks relates to openness to experience. Human Brain Mapping, 39, 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23884.
Blain, S. D., Grazioplene, R. G., Ma, Y., & DeYoung, C. G. (in press). Toward a neural model of the Openness-Psychoticism dimension: Functional connectivity in the default and frontoparietal control networks. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 46, 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbz103.
Blain, S. D., Longenecker, J. M., Grazioplene, R. G., Klimes-Dougan, B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2020). Apophenia as the disposition to false positives: A unifying framework for openness and psychoticism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129, 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000504.
Cattell, R. B. (1947). Confirmation and clarification of primary personality factors. Psychometrika, 12, 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289253.
Christensen, A. P., Cotter, K. N., & Silvia, P. J. (2019). Reopening openness to experience: A network analysis of four openness to experience inventories. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1467428.
Christensen, A. P., Kenett, Y. N., Cotter, K. N., Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2018). Remotely close associations: Openness to experience and semantic memory structure. European Journal of Personality, 32, 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2157.
Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., Davies, S. E., & Birkland, A. (2014). Opening up openness: A theoretical sort following critical incidents methodology and a meta-analytic investigation of the trait family measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.809355.
Conner, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1976). Age differences in personality structure: A cluster analytic approach. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/31.5.564.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1978). Objective personality assessment. In M. Storandt, I. C. Siegler, & M. F. Elias (Eds.), The clinical psychology of aging (pp. 119–143). New York: Plenum Press.
Cotter, K. N., Silvia, P. J., & Fayn, K. (2018). What does feeling like crying when listening to music feel like? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000108.
DeYoung, C. G. (2013). The neuromodulator of exploration: A unifying theory of the role of dopamine in personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00762.
DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.003.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057198.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000035.
Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. J., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011.
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156.
Kemp, K. C., Burgin, C. J., Raulin, M. L., & Kwapil, T. R. (in press). Using multiple measures of openness to experience to capture positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions of schizotypy. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000389.
Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407.
Oleynick, V. C., DeYoung, C. G., Hyde, E., Kaufman, S. B., Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2017). Openness/Intellect: The core of the creative personality. In G. J. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 9–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.002.
Martin, D., Katz-Buonincontro, J., & Livert, D. (2015). Understanding the role of openness to experience in study abroad students. Journal of College Student Development, 56, 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2015.0067.
McCrae, R. R. (1996) Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323.
McCrae, R. R. (2007). Aesthetic chills as a universal marker of openness to experience. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9053-1.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). San Diego: Academic Press.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A more readable revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05.
Mõttus, R. (2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30, 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2041.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040291.
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Shivers and timbres: Personality and the experience of chills from music. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610386810.
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00004-1.
Rogers, C. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 11, 249–260.
Silvia, P. J., Fayn, K., Nusbaum, E. C., & Beaty, R. E. (2015). Openness to experience and awe in response to nature and music: Personality and profound aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000028.
Silvia, P. J., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2011). On personality and piloerection: Individual differences in aesthetic chills and other unusual aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021914.
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., & Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68.
Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036681.
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961/1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00973.x.
Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C. Y., & Stark, S. E. (2014). Openness to experience: Its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.806328.
Zillig, L. M. P., Hemenover, S. H., & Dienstbier, R. A. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes represented in big 5 personality inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Christensen, A.P. (2020). Openness to Experience. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_113-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_113-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences