Skip to main content

Doubly Autoparallel Structure on the Probability Simplex

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Geometry and Its Applications (IGAIA IV 2016)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 252))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

On the probability simplex, we can consider the standard information geometric structure with the e- and m-affine connections mutually dual with respect to the Fisher metric. The geometry naturally defines submanifolds simultaneously autoparallel for the both affine connections, which we call doubly autoparallel submanifolds. In this note we discuss their several interesting common properties. Further, we algebraically characterize doubly autoparallel submanifolds on the probability simplex and give their classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    These cases contradict the fact that \(e \in V_0\).

  2. 2.

    These cases correspond to choosing smaller q or r in the setup.

References

  1. Amari, S.-I., Nagaoka, H.: Methods of Information Geometry. Tanslations of mathematical monographs, vol. 191, American Mathematical Society and Oxford University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ohara, A.: Information Geometric Analysis of an Interior Point Method for Semidefinite Programming. In: Barndorf-Nielsen, O., Jensen, V. (eds.) Proceedings of Geometry in Present Day Science, pp. 49–74. World Scientific (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ohara, A.: Geodesics for dual connections and means on symmetric cones. Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 50, 537–548 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohara, A., Wada, T.: Information geometry of q-gaussian densities and behaviours of solutions to related diffusion equations. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 035002 (18pp.) (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Uohashi, K., Ohara, A.: Jordan algebras and dual affine connections on symmetric cones. Positivity 8(4), 369–378 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikeda, S., Tanaka, T., Amari, S.-I.: Stochastic reasoning, free energy, and information geometry. Neural Comput. 16, 1779–1810 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matúš, F., Ay, N.: On maximization of the information divergence from an exponential family. In: Proceedings of WUPES’03, pp. 199–204 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Montúfar, G.F.: Mixture decompositions of exponential families using a decomposition of their sample spaces. Kybernetika 49(1), 23–39 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagaoka, H.: Information-geometrical characterization of statistical models which are statistically equivalent to probability simplex (2017). arXiv:1701.07736v2

  10. Ay, N., Jost, J., Lê, H.V., Schwanchhöfer, L.: Information Geometry. Springer, Berlin (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kobayashi, S., Nomizu, K.: Foundations of Differential Geometry II. Interscience Publishers (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ohara, A.: Geometry of distributions associated with Tsallis statistics and properties of relative entropy minimization. Phys. Lett. A 370, 184–193 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to a reviewer who has pointed out the Ref. [10] and given comments to improve the original manuscript. A. O. is partially supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid (C) 15K04997 and H. I. is partially supported by JST PRESTO and JSPS Grant-in Aid (C) 16K05174.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsumi Ohara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Complements for Proposition 1

A Complements for Proposition 1

We shortly summarize basic notions of the relation between submanifolds and affine connections and give an outline of the proof for Proposition 1.

For an n-dimensional manifold \(\mathcal{M}\) equipped with an affine connection \(\nabla \), we say that a submanifold \(\mathcal{N}\) is autoparallel with respect to \(\nabla \) when it holds that \(\nabla _X Y \in \mathcal{X}(\mathcal{N})\) for arbitrary \(X, Y \in \mathcal{X}(\mathcal{N})\). Since \(\nabla ^{(\alpha )}\) is nothing but an affine combination of \(\nabla =\nabla ^{(1)}\) and \(\nabla ^*=\nabla ^{(-1)}\), we see that \(\mathcal{N}\) is actually DA if \(\mathcal{N}\) is autoparallel for arbitrary two connections \(\nabla ^{(\alpha )}\) and \(\nabla ^{(\alpha ')}\) with \(\alpha \not =\alpha '\). Hence, the equivalence of the statements (1), (2) and (3) is straightforward.

If every \(\nabla \)-geodesic curve passing through a point \(p \in \mathcal{N}\) that is tangent to \(\mathcal{N}\) at p lies in \(\mathcal{N}\), then \(\mathcal{N}\) is called totally geodesic at p. If \(\mathcal{N}\) is totally geodesic at every point of \(\mathcal{N}\), then we say that \(\mathcal{N}\) is a totally geodesic submanifold in \(\mathcal{M}\). When \(\nabla \) is torsion-free, a submanifold is totally geodesic if and only if it is autoparallel [11]. Since every \(\nabla ^{(\alpha )}\) is torsion-free by the assumption, the equivalence of (3) and (4) holds.

When \(\nabla \) is flat, there exists a coordinate system \((x^1, \ldots , x^n )\) of \(\mathcal{M}\) satisfying \(\nabla _{\partial /\partial x^i} \partial /\partial x^j=0\) for all ij, which we call a \(\nabla \)-affine coordinate system. It is well known ([1, Theorem 1.1], for example) that a submanifold is \(\nabla \)-autoparallel if and only if it is expressed as an affine subspace with respect to \(\nabla \)-affine coordinate system. Then the equivalence of (1) and (5) immediately follows.

For the final statement a proof is given in [12] when \(\mathcal{M}\) is the probability simplex. Since the proof for this general case is similar, it is omitted.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ohara, A., Ishi, H. (2018). Doubly Autoparallel Structure on the Probability Simplex. In: Ay, N., Gibilisco, P., Matúš, F. (eds) Information Geometry and Its Applications . IGAIA IV 2016. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 252. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97798-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics