Abstract
In recent years, the need to attract students towards physics has largely contributed to shape the objectives ascribed to physics teaching in many countries. Among these objectives, critical thinking is unanimously presented as of central importance. But at the same time a stress on competences jointly with this trend to simplify physics might lead to an underdevelopment of conceptual understanding. The following question then arises: can critical thinking be fostered in students without conceptual structuring and (still more importantly) without stressing the pivotal role of a search for coherence in science? This chapter briefly summarises some recent research on the joint development of a conceptual understanding and critical position among university students. In characterising students’ responses when confronted to various explanations of a physical phenomenon, these studies bring to bear conceptual markers as well as meta-cognitive, affective and critical indicators. Some profiles of co-development are characterised, including “delayed critique” and “expert anaesthesia of judgment”. The results strongly suggest that to disregard the objective of conceptual structuring is counterproductive for the development of students’ critical attitude. Through these exploratory studies, it appears that the conditions in which students can begin to search for coherence—whether in pursuit of conceptual understanding or to activate their critical potential—constitute a crucial objective for further research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
Décamp, N. & Viennot, L. (2015). Co-development of conceptual understanding and critical attitude: analysing texts on radiocarbon dating. International Journal of Science Education, 37 2038–63.
European Commission, 2015. Science education for responsible citizenship, Report EUR 26893 EN, Brussels
Giancoli, D.C. (2005). Physics (6th ed): Instructor Resource Center CD-ROM, Prentice Hall.
Jenkins, E. W. (2007). School science: A questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 265–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701245295.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thinking. In B.J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1001–1015). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kahneman, D. (2012) Thinking Fast and Slow. London Penguin books.
Kattmann U. & Duit R. (1998): The model of educational reconstruction. Bringing together issues of scientific clarification and students’ conceptions. In Bayrhuber B(ed): What-Why-How? Research in Didaktik of biology, 253–262.
Komorek, M. & Duit, R. (2004). The teaching experiment as a powerful method to develop and evaluate teaching and learning sequences in the domain of non-linear systems. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 619–633.
Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fuller, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & Rhöneck, C. V. (2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 489–507.
Mathé, S., & Viennot, L. 2009. Stressing the coherence of physics: Students journalists’ and science mediators’ reactions, Problems of education in the 21st century. 11 (11), 104–128.
Ogborn, J. (1997). Constructivist metaphors of learning science. Science & Education, 6, 121–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008642412858
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2),167–199.
Rhöneck, C. V., Grob, K., Schnaitmann, G. W., & Völker, B. (1998). Learning in basic electricity: how do motivation, cognitive and classroom climate factors influence achievement in physics? International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), pp. 551-565.
Viennot, L. 2003. Teaching physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Ac. Pub.
Viennot L. 2006. Teaching rituals and students’ intellectual satisfaction, Phys. Educ. 41, 400-408.
Viennot, L. 2014a. Codevelopment of conceptual understanding and critical attitude: an essential condition for physics learning. Invited address. Frontiers of fundamental physics FFP14, Marseille July 2014. PoS(FFP14)011 http://webcast.in2p3.fr/videos-ffp14_coevelopment_of_conceptual_understanding_and_critical_attitudean_essential_condition_for_physics_learning_laurence_viennot
Viennot, L. 2014b. Thinking in physics The pleasure of reasoning and understanding Dordrecht: Springer/Grenoble Sciences.
Viennot, L. 2015a. Spotlighting a content for teaching: research examples at university level, plenary address, L’esperienza del PLS: guardando oltre –-Roma, 11-12 maggio 2015, text on request from the author
Viennot, L. 2015b. Thinking the content for physics education research and practice, in Fazio C. & Sperandeo-Mineo R.M. (Eds.) Teaching/Learning Physics. Integrating Research into Practice, Proceedings of the GIREP/MPTL 2014 International Conference, Università degli Studi di Palermo, ISBN 978-88-907460-7-9, pp. 61–79 - http://www1.unipa.it/girep2014/proceedings/GIREP-MPTL%202014%20Conference%20Proceedings.pdf
Viennot, L. 2016. The persistence of Teaching Rituals, Physics Education 51 030104
Viennot, L. & De Hosson, C. 2015. From a Subtractive to Multiplicative Approach, A Concept-driven Interactive Pathway on the Selective Absorption of Light, International Journal of Science Education, 37:1, 1-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.950186
Viennot & Décamp, L. 2016a. Co-development of conceptual understanding and critical attitude: toward a systemic analysis of the survival blanket, European Journal of Physics, 37 doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/1/015702
Viennot & Décamp, L. 2016b. Conceptual and critical development in student teachers: First steps towards an integrated comprehension of osmosis, International Journal of Science Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1230793
Willingham, D. T., 2008 Critical thinking: why is it so hard to teach? Arts Educ. Policy Rev. 109, 21–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Viennot, L. (2019). Conceptual Development and Critical Attitude in Physics Education: A Pathway in the Search for Coherence. In: Pietrocola, M. (eds) Upgrading Physics Education to Meet the Needs of Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96163-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96163-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96162-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96163-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)