Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interviews, Multiple Mini-Interviews, and Selection Centers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Selection and Recruitment in the Healthcare Professions

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors give an overview of interviews, multiple mini-interviews (MMI) and selection centres (SC) in a healthcare context. In a short introduction, they summarize key characteristics of these selection methods and highlight conceptual overlaps. Focusing on the question which underlying variables and processes determine the generation of performance scores, the authors point to different theoretical developments and consider three aspects: candidate, situation, and interviewer/assessor. The following section on relevant research findings concentrates on MMIs and provides a case study on the relationship of MMI components with a Situational Judgment Test (SJT) at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. The chapter closes with an outlook on technological advances that might transform the way interviews, MMIs, and SCs will be conducted in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelson, R. D., & Kreiter, C. D. (2009). Rater and occasion impacts on the reliability of pre-admission assessments. Medical Education, 43(12), 1198–1202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bindal, T., Wall, D., & Goodyear, H. M. (2007). Performance of paediatric Senior House Officers following changes in recruitment. Medical Teacher, 29(5), 501–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, F. S., Ortner, T. M., & Fay, D. (2016). Asynchronous video interviewing as a new technology in personnel selection: The applicant’s point of view. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. J., & MacKeigan, L. D. (2012). Development and pilot testing of a multiple mini-interview for admission to a pharmacy degree program. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(1), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. J., MacKeigan, L. D., Mitsakakis, N., & Pugsley, J. A. (2017). Multiple mini-interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination. Medical Education, 51(4), 379–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 655–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2016). New talent signals: Shiny new objects or a brave new world? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Hamstra, S. J., & Hatala, R. (2013). Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: A systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality. Academic Medicine, 88(6), 872–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, W. C., McLaughlin, J. E., Singer, D., Lewis, M., & Dinkins, M. M. (2015). Development and assessment of the multiple mini-interview in a school of pharmacy admissions model. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M., Wang, S., Calvin, J., Dineen, B., & Tomlinson, E. (2002). The panel interview: A review of empirical research and guidelines for practice. Public Personnel Management, 31(3), 397–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, M., Crotty, B., Prideaux, D., Carne, R., Ward, A., & de Leeuw, E. (2009). The multiple mini-interview: How long is long enough? Medical Education, 43(2), 168–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, J., Lynch, B., Till, H., Kumwenda, B., & Husbands, A. (2012). The multiple mini-interview in the UK context: 3 years of experience at Dundee. Medical Teacher, 34(4), 297–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edje, L., Miller, C., Kiefer, J., & Oram, D. (2013). Using skype as an alternative for residency selection interviews. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(3), 503–505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. C., Johnson, E. K., & Molidor, J. B. (1990). The interview in the admission process. Academic Medicine, 65(3), 167–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W. (2003). On the generality of specificity. Medical Education, 37(7), 587–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., & Macala, C. (2014). Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: ‘Tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine. Medical Education, 48(6), 604–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2004). The relationship between interviewers’ characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview. Academic Medicine, 79(6), 602–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Rosenfeld, J., Trinh, K., Wood, T. J., & Norman, G. R. (2012). Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores. JAMA, 308(21), 2233–2240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Trinh, K., Wasi, P., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2009). Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Medical Education, 43(8), 767–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., Reiter, H. I., & Norman, G. R. (2004). An admissions OSCE: The multiple mini-interview. Medical Education, 38(3), 314–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (2012). Accurate personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gafni, N., Moshinsky, A., Eisenberg, O., Zeigler, D., & Ziv, A. (2012). Reliability estimates: Behavioural stations and questionnaires in medical school admissions. Medical Education, 46(3), 277–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T. C. E., Roberts, M. J., Sice, P. J., Langton, J. A., Patterson, F. C., Carr, A. S., …, Davies, P. R. F. (2010). Predictive validity of a selection centre testing non-technical skills for recruitment to training in anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 105(5), 603–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, A., Kogan, J., Yeates, P., Govaerts, M., & Holmboe, E. (2014). Seeing the ‘black box’ differently: Assessor cognition from three research perspectives. Medical Education, 48(11), 1055–1068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goho, J., & Blackman, A. (2006). The effectiveness of academic admission interviews: An exploratory meta-analysis. Medical Teacher, 28(4), 335–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B. (2014). The ability to identify criteria: Its relationship with social understanding, preparation, and impression management in affecting predictor performance in a high-stakes selection context. Human Performance, 27(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B., Harding, D. W., Wilson, I. G., & Yeomans, N. D. (2008). Does practice make perfect? The effect of coaching and retesting on selection tests used for admission to an Australian medical school. Medical Journal of Australia, 189(5), 270–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B., & Hu, W. (2015). The interaction of socio-economic status and gender in widening participation in medicine. Medical Education, 49(1), 103–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B., & Wilson, I. (2012). Associations between the big five personality factors and multiple mini-interviews. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17(3), 377–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B. N., & Wilson, I. G. (2010). Interviewer bias in medical student selection. Medical Journal of Australia, 193(6), 343–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guidry, B. W., Rupp, D. E., & Lanik, M. (2013). Tracing cognition with assessment center simulations: Using technology to see in the dark. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadad, A., Gafni, N., Moshinsky, A., Turvall, E., Ziv, A., & Israeli, A. (2016). The multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of peer evaluations during clinical training in medical school. Medical Teacher, 38(11), 1172–1179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harasym, P. H., Woloschuk, W., Mandin, H., & Brundin-Mather, R. (1996). Reliability and validity of interviewers’ judgments of medical school candidates. Academic Medicine, 71(Suppl. 1), S40–S42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hariton, E., Bortoletto, P., & Ayogu, N. (2016). Residency interviews in the 21st century. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(3), 322–324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hissbach, J. C., Sehner, S., Harendza, S., & Hampe, W. (2014). Cutting costs of multiple mini-interviews—Changes in reliability and efficiency of the Hamburg medical school admission test between two applications. BMC Medical Education, 14, 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeister, M., Lockyer, J., & Crutcher, R. (2009). The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education. Medical Education, 43(6), 573–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I. (2011). An empirical review of the employment interview construct literature. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I., Weekley, J. A., Wiesner, W. H., Degroot, T. G., & Jones, C. (2001). Comparison of situational and behavior description interview questions for higher-level positions. Personnel Psychology, 54(3), 619–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husbands, A., & Dowell, J. (2013). Predictive validity of the Dundee multiple mini-interview. Medical Education, 47(7), 717–725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerant, A., Fancher, T., Fenton, J. J., Fiscella, K., Sousa, F., Franks, P., & Henderson, M. (2015). How medical school applicant race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status relate to multiple mini-interview-based admissions outcomes: Findings from one medical school. Academic Medicine, 90(12), 1667–1674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerant, A., Griffin, E., Rainwater, J., Henderson, M., Sousa, F., Bertakis, K. D., …, Franks, P. (2012). Does applicant personality influence multiple mini-interview performance and medical school acceptance offers? Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1250–1259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. E., Dowell, J., Husbands, A., Newell, J., O’Flynn, S., Kropmans, T., …, Murphy, A. W. (2014). The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population—A mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education, 14, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-J., Nam, K.-S., & Kwon, B. S. (2017). The utility of multiple mini-interviews: Experience of a medical school. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 29(1), 7–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, M., & Hissbach, J. (2014). Multiple mini-interviews: Same concept, different approaches. Medical Education, 48(12), 1157–1175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., Richter, G. M., & Klehe, U.-C. (2007). Candidates’ ability to identify criteria in nontransparent selection procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(3), 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiter, C. D., Yin, P., Solow, C., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9(2), 147–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E. (2008). Why assessment centers do not work the way they are supposed to. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, J.-M., Rioux, R., Gagnon, R., Bourdy, C., & Dennis, A. (2017). Impact of sociodemographic characteristics of applicants in multiple mini-interviews. Medical Teacher, 39(3), 285–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. J., Park, S. B., Park, S. C., Park, W. S., Ryu, S.-W., Yang, J. H., …, Chae, G. B. (2016). Multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of academic achievements during the first 2 years of medical school. BMC Research Notes, 9, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemay, J. F., Lockyer, J. M., Collin, V. T., & Brownell, A. K. W. (2007). Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview. Medical Education, 41(6), 573–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Letterie, G. S. (2002). How virtual reality may enhance training in obstetrics and gynecology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187(Suppl. 3), S37–S40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., De Koster, L., & Schollaert, E. (2008). Current theory and practice of assessment centers: The importance of trait activation. In S. Cartwright & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Psychology (pp. 215–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., & Patterson, F. (2011). The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 927–940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., & Keen, G. (2015). The interplay of elicitation and evaluation of trait-expressive behavior: Evidence in assessment center exercises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1169–1188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lumb, A. B., Homer, M., & Miller, A. (2010). Equity in interviews: Do personal characteristics impact on admission interview scores? Medical Education, 44(11), 1077–1083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCloy, R., & Stone, R. (2001). Virtual reality in surgery. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 323(7318), 912–915.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. G. (1999). The value and role of the interview in the student admissions process: A review. Medical Teacher, 21(5), 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshinsky, A., Ziegler, D., & Gafni, N. (2017). Multiple mini-interviews in the age of the internet: Does preparation help applicants to medical school? International Journal of Testing, 17(3), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, T., Hecker, K., Hausdorf, P. A., & Conlon, P. (2014). Validating MMI scores: Are we measuring multiple attributes? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19(3), 379–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterveld, P., & ten Cate, O. (2004). Generalizability of a study sample assessment procedure for entrance selection for medical school. Medical Teacher, 26(7), 635–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panait, L., Larios, J. M., Brenes, R. A., Fancher, T. T., Ajemian, M. S., Dudrick, S. J., & Sanchez, J. A. (2011). Surgical skills assessment of applicants to general surgery residency. Journal of Surgical Research, 170(2), 189–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashayan, N., Gray, S., Duff, C., Parkes, J., Williams, D., Patterson, F., …, Mason, B. W. (2016). Evaluation of recruitment and selection for specialty training in public health: Interim results of a prospective cohort study to measure the predictive validity of the selection process. Journal of Public Health, 38(2), E194–E200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, F., Knight, A., Dowell, J., Nicholson, S., Cousans, F., & Cleland, J. (2016). How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Medical Education, 50(1), 36–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, F., Lievens, F., Kerrin, M., Munro, N., & Irish, B. (2013). The predictive validity of selection for entry into postgraduate training in general practice: Evidence from three longitudinal studies. The British Journal of General Practice, 63(616), E734–E741.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, F., Rowett, E., Hale, R., Grant, M., Roberts, C., Cousans, F., & Martin, S. (2016). The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia. BMC Medical Education, 16, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pau, A., Chen, Y. S., Lee, V. K. M., Sow, C. F., & De Alwis, R. (2016). What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview? Medical Education Online, 21, 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, M., Burnett, M., Martin, B. D., Christensen, H., Young, D. G., MacKalski, B., & Aoki, F. (2013). Utility of a writing station in the multiple mini-interview. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 40(2), 177–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, M., Martin, B. D., Burnett, M., Aoki, F., Christensen, H., MacKalski, F., …, Ripstein, I. (2013). Multiple mini-interview scores of medical school applicants with and without rural attributes. Rural and Remote Health, 13(2), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, E. L., Hawarden, A. W., Dent, G., Hays, R., Bates, J., & Hassell, A. B. (2016). Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37. Medical Teacher, 38(5), 443–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, H. I., Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Medical Education, 41(4), 378–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, H. I., Lockyer, J., Ziola, B., Courneya, C. A., & Eva, K. (2012). Should efforts in favor of medical student diversity be focused during admissions or farther upstream? Academic Medicine, 87(4), 443–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, H. I., Salvatori, P., Rosenfeld, J., Trinh, K., & Eva, K. W. (2006). The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews. Medical Education, 40(1), 36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., Clark, T., Burgess, A., Frommer, M., Grant, M., & Mossman, K. (2014). The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training. BMC Medical Education, 14, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., Rothnie, I., Zoanetti, N., & Crossley, J. (2010). Should candidate scores be adjusted for interviewer stringency or leniency in the multiple mini-interview? Medical Education, 44(7), 690–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., Zoanetti, N., & Rothnie, I. (2009). Validating a multiple mini-interview question bank assessing entry-level reasoning skills in candidates for graduate-entry medicine and dentistry programmes. Medical Education, 43(4), 350–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. J., Gale, T. C. E., McGrath, J. S., & Wilson, M. R. (2016). Rising to the challenge: Acute stress appraisals and selection centre performance in applicants to postgraduate specialty training in anaesthesia. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(2), 323–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. J., Gale, T. C. E., Sice, P. J. A., & Anderson, I. R. (2013). The relative reliability of actively participating and passively observing raters in a simulation-based assessment for selection to specialty training in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 68(6), 591–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. M., Reiter, H. I., Trinh, K., & Eva, K. W. (2008). A cost efficiency comparison between the multiple mini-interview and traditional admissions interviews. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(1), 43–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., Walker, I., Cooke, L., Raman, M., Ravani, P., Coderre, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2017). Are female applicants rated higher than males on the multiple mini-interview? Findings from the University of Calgary. Academic Medicine, 92(6), 841–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Hoffman, B. J., Bischof, D., Byham, W., Collins, L., Gibbons, A., …, Thornton, G. (2015). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1244–1273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatori, P. (2001). Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 6(2), 159–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, D. J., Day, D. V., Mayes, B. T., & Riggio, R. E. (2002). A new frame for frame-of-reference training: Enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 735–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheis, M. T., & Rizzo, A. A. (2001). The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46(3), 296–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebok, S. S., Luu, K., & Klinger, D. A. (2014). Psychometric properties of the multiple mini-interview used for medical admissions: Findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19(1), 71–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. K., Arora, S., Skipper, B., Kalishman, S., Timm, T. C., & Smith, A. Y. (2012). Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection. The Journal of Urology, 187(4), 1380–1384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiller, D., O’Mara, D., Rothnie, I., Dunn, S., Lee, L., & Roberts, C. (2013). Internet-based multiple mini-interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes. Medical Education, 47, 801–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, E. N., & Mejia, C. (2017). Asynchronous video interviews in the hospitality industry: Considerations for virtual employee selection. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 61(Suppl. C), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uijtdehaage, S., Doyle, L. H., & Parker, N. (2011). Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders. Academic Medicine, 86(8), 1032–1039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(5), 372–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T., Sato, J., Yoshimura, H., Okubo, T., Hiraoka, E., Shiga, T., …, Ban, N. (2017). Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: Past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission. BMC Medical Education, 17, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, A., Rubin, O., Moshinsky, A., Gafni, N., Kotler, M., Dagan, Y., …, Mittelman, M. (2008). MOR: A simulation-based assessment centre for evaluating the personal and interpersonal qualities of medical school candidates. Medical Education, 42(10), 991–998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

    Mirjana Knorr, Johanna Hissbach & Wolfgang Hampe

Authors
  1. Mirjana Knorr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johanna Hissbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfgang Hampe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirjana Knorr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Work Psychology Group, Derby, UK

    Fiona Patterson

  2. Organizational Psychology, City, University of London, London, UK

    Lara Zibarras

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Knorr, M., Hissbach, J., Hampe, W. (2018). Interviews, Multiple Mini-Interviews, and Selection Centers. In: Patterson, F., Zibarras, L. (eds) Selection and Recruitment in the Healthcare Professions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94971-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation