Abstract
For a Boolean function \(f:\{0,1\}^n\rightarrow \{0,1\}\) computed by a circuit C over a finite basis \(\mathcal{B}\), the energy complexity of C (denoted by \(\mathsf {EC}_{\mathcal{B}}(C)\)) is the maximum over all inputs \(\{0,1\}^n\) the numbers of gates of the circuit C (excluding the inputs) that output a one. Energy complexity of a Boolean function over a finite basis \(\mathcal{B}\) denoted by where C is a circuit over \(\mathcal{B}\) computing f.
We study the case when \(\mathcal{B}= \{\wedge _2, \vee _2, \lnot \}\), the standard Boolean basis. It is known that any Boolean function can be computed by a circuit (with potentially large size) with an energy of at most \(3n(1+\epsilon (n))\) for a small \( \epsilon (n)\)(which we observe is improvable to \(3n-1\)). We show several new results and connections between energy complexity and other well-studied parameters of Boolean functions.
-
For all Boolean functions f, \(\mathsf {EC}(f) \le O(\mathsf {DT}(f)^3)\) where \(\mathsf {DT}(f)\) is the optimal decision tree depth of f.
-
We define a parameter positive sensitivity (denoted by \(\mathsf {psens}\)), a quantity that is smaller than sensitivity and defined in a similar way, and show that for any Boolean circuit C computing a Boolean function f, \( \mathsf {EC}(C) \ge \mathsf {psens}(f)/3\).
-
Restricting the above notion of energy complexity to Boolean formulas, denoted \(\mathsf {EC^{F}}(f)\), we show that \(\mathsf {EC^{F}}(f) = \varTheta (L(f))\) where L(f) is the minimum size of a formula computing f.
We next prove lower bounds on energy for explicit functions. In this direction, we show that for the perfect matching function on an input graph of n edges, any Boolean circuit with bounded fan-in must have energy \(\varOmega (\sqrt{n})\). We show that any unbounded fan-in circuit of depth 3 computing the parity on n variables must have energy is \(\varOmega (n)\).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
With values of the weights and threshold being arbitrary rational numbers, notice that this basis is no longer finite and hence the bounds and the related trichotomy are not applicable.
- 3.
\(\mathsf {ADDR}_k(x_1,x_2,\ldots ,x_k, y_0,y_1,\ldots ,y_{2^k-1}) = y_{int(x)}\) where int(x) is the integer representation of the binary string \(x_1x_2\ldots x_k\).
References
Razborov, A.A.: Lower bounds on the size of constant-depth networks over a complete basis with logical addition. Mathemat. Zametki 41(4), 598–607 (1987)
Antoniadis, A., Barcelo, N., Nugent, M., Pruhs, K., Scquizzato, M.: Energy-efficient circuit design. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 303–312 (2014)
Barcelo, N., Nugent, M., Pruhs, K., Scquizzato, M.: Almost all functions require exponential energy. Math. Found. Comput. Sci. 2015, 90–101 (2015)
Kasim-zade, O.M.: On a measure of active circuits of functional elements. In: Mathematical Problems in Cybernetics “Nauka”, vol. no. 4, pp. 218–228 (1992). (in Russian)
Kissin, G.: Measuring energy consumption in VLSI circuits: a foundation. In: Proceedings of the 14 Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (1982)
Kushilevitz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication Complexity, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Lozhkin, S.A., Shupletsov, M.S.: Switching activity of boolean circuits and synthesis of boolean circuits with asymptotically optimal complexity and linear switching activity. Lobachevskii J. Math. 36(4), 450–460 (2015)
Markov, A.A.: On the inversion complexity of a system of functions. J. ACM 5(4), 331–334 (1958)
Raz, R., Wigderson, A.: Monotone circuits for matching require linear depth. J. ACM 39(3), 736–744 (1992)
Uchizawa, K., Douglas, R.J., Maass, W.: On the computational power of threshold circuits with sparse activity. Neural Comput. 18(12), 2994–3008 (2006)
Uchizawa, K., Takimoto, E.: Exponential lower bounds on the size of constant-depth threshold circuits with small energy complexity. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 407(1–3), 474–487 (2008)
Uchizawa, K., Takimoto, E., Nishizeki, T.: Size-energy tradeoffs for unate circuits computing symmetric boolean functions. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 412, 773–782 (2011)
Vaintsvaig, M.N.: On the power of networks of functional elements. In: Soviet Physics Doklady, vol. 6, p. 545 (1962)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dinesh, K., Otiv, S., Sarma, J. (2018). New Bounds for Energy Complexity of Boolean Functions. In: Wang, L., Zhu, D. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10976. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94776-1_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94776-1_61
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94775-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94776-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)