Skip to main content

Towards a Logical Framework for Diagnostic Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications 2018 (KES-AMSTA-18 2018)

Abstract

Diagnosis is widely used in many different disciplines to identify the nature and cause of a certain phenomenon. We present \(t\mathsf {L}\), a new logical framework able to formalise diagnostic reasoning, i.e., an hybrid learning technique based both on deduction and experiments. In this paper we introduce tL, a Labeled Modal Logic, garnishing with temporal and statistical information and a basic propositional language.

After proposing examples on how tL effectively works, we sketch the main ideas about the full deduction system à la Prawitz we are currently developing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Roughly speaking, a false positive, commonly called a ‘false alarm’, is a result that indicates a given condition exists, when it does not, and on the reverse way for false negative.

  2. 2.

    In principle, tests can be considered without false negatives when the number of false negative results is irrelevant to the decision process.

  3. 3.

    If a test was both correct and complete, then the test would be the property it reveals.

References

  1. Caleiro, C., Viganò, L., Volpe, M.: A labeled deduction system for the logic UB. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, pp. 45–53 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cristani, M., Burato, E., Gabrielli, N.: Ontology-driven compression of temporal series: a case study in SCADA technologies. In: Proceedings of DEXA Workshop, Turin, Italy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cristani, M., Rotolo, A.: Meaning negotiation with defeasible logic. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 74, 67–76 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, R.: Diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior. Artif. Intell. 24(1–3), 347–410 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Rotolo, A., Scannapieco, S., Cristani, M.: Picking up the best goal an analytical study in defeasible logic. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 8035, pp. 99–113 (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Scannapieco, S., Cristani, M.: Superiority based revision of defeasible theories. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), LNCS, vol. 6403, pp. 104–118 (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Scannapieco, S., Cristani, M.: The hardness of revising defeasible preferences. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), LNCS, vol. 8620, pp. 168–177 (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Scannapieco, S., Rotolo, A., Cristani, M.: Strategic argumentation is NP-complete. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 263, 399–404 (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Scannapieco, S., Rotolo, A., Cristani, M.: The rationale behind the concept of goal. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 16(3), 296–324 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, P.E., Durán, A.S., Hassebrock, F., Moller, J., Prietula, M., Feltovich, P.J., Swanson, D.B.: Expertise and error in diagnostic reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 5(3), 235–283 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawson, A.E., Daniel, E.S.: Inferences of clinical diagnostic reasoning and diagnostic error. J. Biomed. Inform. 44(3), 402–412 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Masini, A., Viganò, L., Zorzi, M.: A qualitative modal representation of quantum register transformations. In: ISMVL 2008, pp. 131–137 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Masini, A., Viganò, L., Zorzi, M.: Modal deduction systems for quantum state transformations. Mult. Valued Log. Soft Comput. 17(5–6), 475–519 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. McShane, M., Beale, S., Nirenburg, S., Jarrell, B., Fantry, G.: Inconsistency as a diagnostic tool in a society of intelligent agents. Artif. Intell. Med. 55(3), 137–148 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McSherry, D.: Conversational case-based reasoning in medical decision making. Artif. Intell. Med. 52(2), 59–66 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reiter, R.: A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artif. Intell. 32(1), 57–95 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Rish, I.: An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. In: IJCAI Workshop on Empirical Methods in AI (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tomazzoli, C., Cristani, M., Karafili, E., Olivieri, F.: Non-monotonic reasoning rules for energy efficiency. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 9(3), 345–360 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Viganò, L.: Labelled Non-Classical Logics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Viganò, L., Volpe, M., Zorzi, M.: A branching distributed temporal logic for reasoning about entanglement-free quantum state transformations. Inf. Comput. 255, 311–333 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Viganò, L., Volpe, M., Zorzi, M.: Quantum state transformations and branching distributed temporal logic. In: 21st International Workshop, WoLLIC 2014, Valparaíso, Chile, 1–4 September 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8652, pp. 1–19 (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Cristani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cristani, M., Olivieri, F., Tomazzoli, C., Zorzi, M. (2019). Towards a Logical Framework for Diagnostic Reasoning. In: Jezic, G., Chen-Burger, YH., Howlett, R., Jain, L., Vlacic, L., Šperka, R. (eds) Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications 2018. KES-AMSTA-18 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 96. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92031-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics