Skip to main content

Evolution Education in Indonesia: Pre-service Biology Teachers’ Knowledge, Reasoning Models, and Acceptance of Evolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution Education Around the Globe

Abstract

Indonesia has received little attention in the evolution education research community despite being the world’s largest Muslim-majority nation and the third most populous democracy. As such, Indonesia has the potential to test generalizations and shed new light on the ways in which religion, culture, and formal education contribute to evolutionary understanding, reasoning, and acceptance levels. Here, we report on empirical studies of moderately large samples (n > 300) of Indonesian pre-service biology teachers’ understanding, reasoning, and acceptance of Evolution. In the first and second study, we compare American and Indonesian student’s evolutionary reasoning patterns across a range of tasks using written prompts and clinical interviews. In the third study we investigate Indonesian pre-service biology teachers’ acceptance of evolution. Our first and second studies found that Indonesian participants commonly displayed: lower levels of understanding compared to American samples, mixtures of naive and normative concepts in evolutionary explanations, weak cognitive coherence across tasks, and teleological reasoning in explanations of evolutionary change. In the third study, we found that Indonesian participants, like those in other cultures, have greater acceptance of microevolution, followed by lower acceptance of macroevolution and human evolution. Taken together, our studies suggest that cognitive difficulties inherent to thinking about evolution, to a greater extent than cultural and religious influences, are shaping evolutionary reasoning patterns and acceptance levels in Indonesian pre-service biology teachers. This finding is notable given the strong religious nature of Indonesian society and the prominent role of religion in Indonesian formal education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Athanasiou, K., & Papadopoulou, P. (2012). Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: Knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 903–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J. (1970). Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. Philosophy of Science, 37(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggrow, E. P., Ha, M., Nehm, R. H., Pearl, D., & Boone, W. J. (2014). Assessing scientific practices using machine-learning methods: How closely do they match clinical interview performance? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 160–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerding, L. A., Deniz, H., & Anderson, E. S. (2017). Evolution acceptance and epistemological beliefs of college biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 493–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA [Central Intelligence Agency]. (2016a, November 10). The world factbook: East and Southeast Asia Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html.

  • CIA [Central Intelligence Agency]. (2016b, November 14). The World factbook: North America United States. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html.

  • Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Großschedl, J., Konnemann, C., & Basel, N. (2014). Pre-service biology teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory and their preference for its teaching. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(1), 18-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoag, H. (2009, April 3). Muslim students weigh in on evolution: In Indonesia and Pakistan, questions about how science and faith can be reconciled. In Nature News. Retrieved from: http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090403/full/news.2009.230.html.

  • Kelemen, D. (2012). Teleological minds: How natural intuitions about agency and purpose influence learning about evolution. In K. Rosengren & E. M. Evans (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, S. E. (2003). The acceptance and understanding of evolutionary theory among Ohio secondary life science teachers. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS international results in science. Lynch School of Education, Boston College: IEA TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendikbud [Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture]. (2016). Salinan Lampiran Permendikbud No. 21th 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah [A copy of the additional documents of Indonesian ministry of education and culture regulation number 21 year 2016 on Content Standards for Primary and Secondary Education].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., & Hardy, K. K. (2015). Trust in science and scientists and the acceptance of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 8(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2008). Educational psychologists’ knowledge of evolution. In Annual meeting of the American psychological association, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., & Southerland, S. (2012). A more fine-grained measure of students’ acceptance of evolution: development of the inventory of student evolution acceptance—I-SEA. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1637–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Ridgway, J. (2011). What do experts and novices “see” in evolutionary problems? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(4), 666–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Beggrow, E. P., Opfer, J. E., & Ha, M. (2012). Reasoning about natural selection: diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS instrument. The American Biology Teacher, 74(2), 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Rector, M. A., & Ha, M. (2010). “Force-Talk” in evolutionary explanation: Metaphors and misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(4), 605–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. (2017). Religious environmental education? The new school curriculum in Indonesia. Environmental Education Research, 23(9), 1249–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, M. L. (1996). Indiana high school biology teachers and evolutionary theory: Acceptance and understanding. Doctoral dissertation, Ball State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, M. L., & Sadler, K. C. (2007). Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher, 69(6), 332–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbeglia, G., Nehm, R. H. (2017). Does evolution acceptance differ across biological scales? A Rasch analysis of the I-SEA. Paper presented at the national association for research in science teaching (NARST) international conference, San Antonio, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education—Or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, S. (2005). Causal models: How people think about the world and its alternatives. New York, NJ: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., Snyder, S. W., & Devereaux, R. S. (2016). The GAENE—Generalized acceptance of evolution evaluation: Development of a new measure of evolution acceptance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1289–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudargo, F. (2009). Syllabus of evolution subject for biology education department [Silabus Mata Kuliah Evolusi untuk Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi]. Retrieved from http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR_PEND_BIOLOGI/195107261978032-FRANSISCA_SUDARGO/SILABUS_MK_06_evolusi.pdf.

  • Trani, R. (2004). I won’t teach evolution; it’s against my religion. And now for the rest of the story …. The American Biology Teacher, 66(6), 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank to the editors for allowing us to contribute to this important volume.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif Rachmatullah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rachmatullah, A., Nehm, R.H., Roshayanti, F., Ha, M. (2018). Evolution Education in Indonesia: Pre-service Biology Teachers’ Knowledge, Reasoning Models, and Acceptance of Evolution. In: Deniz, H., Borgerding, L. (eds) Evolution Education Around the Globe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90938-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90939-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics