Skip to main content

The Regulation of Gambling in Early Twenty-First Century Britain: Liberalisation and Its Consequences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gambling Policies in European Welfare States

Part of the book series: Work and Welfare in Europe ((RECOWE))

Abstract

Two eras of gambling liberalisation in twentieth century Britain are outlined, culminating in a particularly large and diverse free market in the early twenty-first century. The lead government department is responsible for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and is committed to gambling industry growth and industry involvement in social responsibility. A public health perspective is lacking. One consequence is that questions of ethics and values remain officially off the agenda, although public attitudes remain critical of gambling liberalisation. A further consequence is the absence of a national structure for research, prevention and treatment which is independent of the provider industry. This unsatisfactory state of affairs is illustrated by the government’s current position on live issues such as high-stake gambling machines and increased gambling advertising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • The Betting and Gaming Act. (1960). HO 291/6. First published 1961, April 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binde, P. (2014). Gambling advertising: A critical research review. Report prepared for the Responsible Gambling Trust (now GambleAware). London: The Responsible Gambling Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAP and BCAP Gambling Review. (2015, January 1). Research/Report/Survey. Retrieved from https://www.asa.org.uk/resource/CAP-and-BCAP-gambling-review.html.

  • Cassidy, R., Loussouarn, C., & Pisac, A. (2014). Fair game: Producing gambling research. The Goldsmiths Report. Goldsmiths, University of London/ International Gambling Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creigh-Tyte, S. (1997). Building a national lottery: Reviewing British experience. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport [DCMS]. (2002). A safe bet for success: Modernising Britain’s gambling laws. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [DDCMS]. (2017). Consultation on proposals for changes to gaming machines and social responsibility measures. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk.

  • Dixon, D. (1991). From prohibition to regulation: Bookmaking, anti-gambling and the law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2017, February 9). Daily chart: The world’s biggest gamblers. https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/02/daily-chart-4.

  • GambleAware. (2017). Remote gambling research: Interim report on phase II. Retrieved from https://about.gambleaware.org/research/research-publications.

  • Gambling Act 2005. C. 19. 2005, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling Bill. 2004, 18 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling Commission. (2017, February). Gambling participation in 2016: Behaviour, awareness and attitudes. Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling Commission. (2018). Latest industry statistics. Retrieved from www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk.

  • Gaming Board. (2000). Report of the Gaming Board for Great Britain 1999/2000. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, L., & Smith, G. (2017). Critiquing the Reno Model I-iv international influence on regulators and governments (2004–2015): The distorted reality of “responsible gambling”. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9746-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, S. (2004). Gambling and the risk society: The liberalisation and legitimation crisis of gambling in the Netherlands. International Gambling Studies, 4, 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miers, D. (2004). Regulating commercial gambling: Past, present and future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miers, D. (2015). Regulation and the management of risk in commercial gambling in Great Britain. International Gambling Studies, 15, 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2015.1068352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J. (2011). An unsafe bet? The dangerous rise of gambling and the debate we should be having. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J. (2012). Gambling in Britain: The application of restraint erosion theory. Addiction, 107, 2082–2086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J., Griffiths, M., Wardle, H., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Negative public attitudes towards gambling: Findings from the 2007 British gambling prevalence survey using a new attitude scale. International Gambling Studies, 9, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reith, G. (1999). The age of chance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Responsible Gambling Trust [RGT]. (2014). Gaming machines located in British bookmakers. http://www.responsiblegamblingtrust.org.uk/Research-Publications.

  • Skidelsky, R., & Skidelsky, E. (2013). How much is enough? Money and the good life. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street Betting Act. 1906. c. 43. HL/PO/PU/1/1906/6E7c43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkunen, P., Babor, T., Cisneros Ă–rnberg, J., Egerer, M., Hellman, M., & Livingstone, C., et al. (2018). Setting limits: Gambling, science, and public policy. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., & Jotangla, D., et al. (2011). British gambling prevalence survey 2010. London: The Gambling Commission.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim Orford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Orford, J. (2018). The Regulation of Gambling in Early Twenty-First Century Britain: Liberalisation and Its Consequences. In: Egerer, M., Marionneau, V., Nikkinen, J. (eds) Gambling Policies in European Welfare States . Work and Welfare in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90620-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90620-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90619-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90620-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics