Skip to main content

Abstract

The MDS is discussed as a profile analysis approach of re-parameterizing the linear latent variable model in such a way that the latent variables can be interpreted in terms of profile patterns rather than factors. It is used to identify major patterns among psychological variables and can serve as the basis for further study of correlates and/or predictors of profiles and other background and external variables. I outline the procedure of MDS profile analysis and discuss the issues that are related to parameter estimation and interpretation of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Affnso, V. C., Oakland, T. D., Larocca, R., & Spanakos, A. (2000). The course on individual cognitive assessment. School Psychology Review, 29(1), 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Oxford: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, G. G., Tucker, L. R., & Chang, W. C. (1971). A scalar product model for the multidimensional scaling of choice. Psychometrika, 36, 369–388.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Benzecri, J. P. (1969). Statistical analysis as a tool to make patterns emerge from data. In S. Watanabe (Ed.), Methodologies of pattern recognition (pp. 35–74). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9(2), 291–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1967). The three basic factor analytic research designs: Their interrelations and derivatives. In D. N. Jackson & S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in human assessment (pp. 288–299). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M., & Jones, L. E. (1976). A similarity-attraction model for predicting sociometric choice from perceived group structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 601–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M. L. (1983). Multidimensional scaling. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M. L. (1994). Multidimensional scaling models of personality responding. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 196–215). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M. L., Gasser, M., & Ding, S. (1996). Identifying major profile patterns in a population: An exploratory study of WAIS and GATB patterns. Psychological Assessment, 8, 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M. L., & Sireci, S. G. (2000). Multidimensional scaling. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 323–352). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M. L., & Skay, C. L. (1991). Multidimensional scaling and factor models of test and item responses. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 551–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, C. (2005). Determining the significance of scale values from multidimensional scaling profile analysis using a resampling method. Behavioral Research Methods, 37(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B., & Davies, M. (1982). Epidemiology of depressive mood in adolescents. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 1205–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 28–42.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36, 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–64). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paddock, J. R., & Nowicki, S. J. (1986). The circumplexity of Leary’s interpersonal circle: A multidimensional scaling perspective. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. C., Schulenberg, J., Abramowitz, R. H., Offer, D., & Jarcho, H. D. (1984). A self-image questionnaire for young adolescents (SIQYA): Reliability and validity studies. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S. I., Reddy, L. A., Kletzel, J. E., Schmelzer, E. R., & Boyer, L. M. (2000). The practitioners’s view of IQ testing and profile analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speece, D. L., & Cooper, D. H. (1990). Ontogeny of school failure: Classification of first-grade children. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. (1960). Intra-individual and inter-individual multidimensionality. In H. Gulliksen & S. Messick (Eds.), Psychological scaling: Theory and applications (pp. 155–167). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1990). Metric scaling: Correspondence analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ding, C.S. (2018). Latent Profile Analysis. In: Fundamentals of Applied Multidimensional Scaling for Educational and Psychological Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78172-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics