Skip to main content

Secondary Student Mentorship and Research in Complex Networks: Process and Effects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Network Science In Education

Abstract

There is increasing interest in rethinking approaches to K-12 education that better prepare students to face an adult world and work life of data-driven and interdisciplinary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The science of complex networks, also known as network science, is the application of advanced graph theory to characterize, visualize, and analyze complex connected social, biological, technological, and physical systems. It is an important approach to study many problems in data-driven STEM and provides an intuitive pathway for students of any age to understand complex systems. This paper describes the development of a successful mentorship model that combines deep engagement with team research, enabling high school students and teachers to perform successful research projects in the science of complex networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Euler, Leonhard (1736). Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 8. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moreno, J. (1934). Who Shall Survive? A new Approach to the Problem of Human Interrelations. Beacon House.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes, J. (1954). Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. Human Relations 7. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barabási A.-L., Albert R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, Vol. 286, No. 5439. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. 509.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pastor-Satorras, R. and Vespignani, A. (2001) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks, Physical Review Letters 86. Ridge NY: American Physical Society. 3200.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabàsi, A-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., and Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. 721.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forrester, Jay W (1976) Moving into the 21st Century: Dilemmas and Strategies for American Higher Education. Liberal Education, Vol. 62, No. 2. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges & Universities. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hart, E., Maltas, J. and Rich, B. (1990) Teaching Discrete Mathematics in Grades 7–12. Mathematics Teacher Vol. 83, No. 5. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 362.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bollobas, B. (1998) Modern Graph Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 184. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, S. and Rivera-Marrero, O. (2004) Graph Theory: A Topic for Helping Secondary Teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fuhrmann, S. , MacEachren, A. , Deberry, M. , Bosley, J., LaPorte Taylor, R. , Gahegan, M. & Downs, R. (2005) MapStats for Kids: Making Geographic and Statistical Facts Available to Children, Journal of Geography, 104:6, 233–241, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340508978645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smithers, D. (2005) Graph Theory for the Secondary School Classroom. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1015. http://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1015. Accessed 1/1/18.

  14. Lessner, D. (2011), Graph Theory at Czech Grammar Schools, in WDS’11 Proceedings of Contributed Papers: Part I - Mathematics and Computer Sciences (eds. J. Safrankova and J. Pavlu), Prague, Matfyzpress. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Casey, N., Fellows, M., and Hawylycz, M. (1993) This Is MEGA Mathematics: Stories And Activities For Mathematical Problem Solving And Communication, The Los Alamos Workbook. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Siegel, E., and Uzzo, S. (2010) Connections: The Nature of Networks, Communicating Complex and Emerging Science. In Science Exhibitions, Communication and Evaluation. Edited by Anastasia Filippoupoliti. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rothenberg, M. and Hart, J. (2006) Analysis of Visitor Experience in the Exhibition Connections: the Nature of Networks at the New York Hall of Science. Northampton, MA: People, Places & Design Research.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dancu, T., Gutwill, J., and Sindorf, L. (2009) Geometry Playground Pathways Study. San Francisco, CA: Exploratorium.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Laibowitz, M. (2004) Meaning Density and Other Attributes of Deep Engagement MIT Media Lab report. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pugh, K., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K., Stewart, V. and Manzey, C. (2010), Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94. New York: Wiley and Sons. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Crick, R, (2012) Deep Engagement as a Complex System: Identity, Learning Power and Authentic Enquiry. in: Sandra L Christenson, S Reschly, C. Wylie (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer. 675.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen, B., & Cohen, E. (1991). From groupwork among children to R&D teams: Interdependence, interaction and productivity. In E. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes,Vol. 8. West Yorkshire: Emerald Publishing. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Webb, N. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garland, D., O’ Connor, M., Wolfer, T., and Netting, F. (2006) Team-based Research Notes from the Field. Qualitative Social Work Volume: 5 No. 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu, L., Lee, K. and Lin, C, (2010) A comparison of individual and team research performance: A study of patents in III, Picmet 2010 Technology Management For Global Economic Growth, Phuket. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Research Council. 2015. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19007.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Blansky, D., Kavanaugh, C., Boothroyd, C., Benson, B., Gallagher, J., Endress, J., and Sayama, H. (2013). Spread of academic success in a high school social network. PLOS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 2. e55944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Faux, R. (2014) Summer Workshop Evaluation Report. Boston, MA: Davis Square Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Faux, R. (2015) Evaluation of the NetSci High ITEST Project: Summative Report. Boston, MA: Davis Square Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Daniel, Wayne W. (1990). “Kolmogorov–Smirnov one-sample test”. Applied Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed.). Boston: PWS-Kent. pp. 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harrington, H., Beguerisse-Díaz, M., Rombach, M., Keating L, and Porter, M. (2013) Teach network science to teenagers. Network Science, Vol.1, No. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sanchez, A., Brandle, C. (2014). More network science for teenagers. arXiv:1403.3618.

    Google Scholar 

  33. NetSciEd (2018) NetSciEd Symposia (https://sites.google.com/a/binghamton.edu/netscied/events/netscied-symposia) Accessed 1/1/18.

  34. Cramer, C., Porter, M., Sayama, H., Sheetz, L. and Uzzo, S. (2015) What are essential concepts about networks? Journal of Complex Networks. Vol. 3 No. 4 Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. NetSciEd (2015) Network Literacy: Essential Concepts and Core Ideas. (http://tinyurl.com/networkliteracy) Accessed 1/1/18.

  36. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the National Science Foundation (BCS Award #1027752 and DRL Award #1139478) for supporting this important work. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 NetSci High Student Research Projects 2010–2015

2010–2011

  • A Comparative Study on the Social Networks of Fictional Characters

  • Academic Achievement and Personal Satisfaction in High School Social Networks

  • Does Facebook Friendship Reflect Real Friendship?

  • Inter-Species Protein-Protein Interaction Network Reveals Protein Interfaces for Conserved Function

  • The Hierarchy of Endothelial Cell Phenotypes

  • Preaching To The Choir? Using Social Networks to Measure the Success of a Message

  • Identification of mRNA Target Sites for siRNA Mediated VAMP Protein Knockdown in Rattus norvegicus

2011–2012

  • A Possible Spread of Academic Success in a High School Social Network: A Two-Year Study

  • Research on Social Network Analysis from a Younger Generation

2012–2013

  • Interactive Simulations and Games for Teaching about Networks

  • Mapping Protein Networks in Three Dimensions

  • Main and North Campus: Are We Really Connected?

  • High School Communication: Electronic or Face-to-Face?

  • An Analysis of the Networks of Product Creation and Trading in the Virtual Economy of Team Fortress 2

2013–2014

  • A Network Analysis of Foreign Aid Based on Bias of Political Ideologies

  • Comparing Two Human Disease Networks: Gene-Based and System-Based Perspectives

  • How Does One Become Successful on Reddit.com?

  • Influence at the 1787 Constitutional Convention

  • Quantifying Similarity of Benign and Oncogenic Viral Proteins Using Amino Acid Sequence

  • Quantification of Character and Plot in Contemporary Fiction

  • RedNet: A Different Perspective of Reddit

  • Tracking Tweets for the Superbowl

2014–2015

  • Network Analysis of Microgravity-Influenced Genes in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium

  • Connecting Radon Levels to Cancer rates in California Counties: A Network Approach

  • National Football League Network

  • Drug combinations and adverse side effects

  • Comparing post-secondary institutions across the United States

  • Relationships Between Musculoskeletal System and High School Sports Injuries

  • Similarities Found in Neurological Disorders Based on Mutated Genes and Drug Molecules

  • The Relationships of International Superpowers

  • Protein Association and Nucleotide Similarities Among Human Alpha-Papillomaviruses

1.2 Network Literacy: Essential Concepts and Core Ideas

  1. 1.

    Networks are everywhere.

    • The concept of networks is a broad, general idea about how things are connected and working together. Networks are present in every aspect of life.

    • There are networks that form the technical infrastructure of our society (e.g., communication systems, the Internet, the electric grid, the water supply).

    • There are networks of people, e.g., families and friends, email/text exchanges, Facebook/Twitter/Instagram, and professional groups.

    • There are economic networks, e.g., financial transactions, corporate partnerships, and international trades.

    • There are biological/ecological networks, e.g., food webs, gene/protein interactions, neural networks, and spread of diseases.

    • There are cultural networks, e.g., language, literature, art, history, and religion.

    • Networks can exist at various spatial and/or temporal scales.

  2. 2.

    Networks describe how things connect and interact.

    • There is a subfield of mathematics that applies to networks. It is called graph theory. A graph in mathematics means a network.

    • Connections are called links, edges, and ties. Things that are connected are called nodes, vertices, and actors.

    • Connections can be undirected (symmetric) or directed (asymmetric).

    • The number of connections a node has is called a degree of that node.

    • In some networks, you can find a small number of nodes that have much larger degrees than others. They are called hubs.

    • A sequence of links that leads you from one node, through other nodes, to another node is called a path.

    • In some networks, you can find a group of nodes that are well connected to each other. They are often called clusters, cliques, and communities.

  3. 3.

    Networks help reveal patterns .

    • You can represent something as a network by describing what its parts are and how they are connected to each other. Such network representation is a very powerful way to study its properties.

    • Some of the properties in a network that you can study are:

      • How the degrees are distributed across nodes.

      • Which parts or connections are the most important ones.

      • Strengths and/or weaknesses of the network.

      • If there is any substructure or hierarchy.

      • How many hops, on average, are needed to move from one node to another within the network.

        Using these findings, you may be able to make predictions.

  4. 4.

    Visualizations can provide an understanding of networks.

    • Networks can be visualized in a number of different ways.

    • You can draw a diagram of a network by connecting nodes with links.

    • There are a variety of tools available for visualizing networks.

    • Visualization of a network often helps to understand it and communicate the ideas to people in an intuitive, nontechnical way.

    • Creative information design plays a very important role in making an effective visualization.

    • It is important to be careful when interpreting and evaluating visualizations, because they may not tell the whole story about the networks.

  5. 5.

    Today’s computer technology allows us to study real-world networks.

    • Computer technology has dramatically enhanced our ability to study networks, especially large complex ones.

    • There are many free software tools available for network visualization and analysis.

    • Using personal computers, everyone can easily model, visualize, and analyze networks, not just scientists.

    • Through the Internet, everyone has access to many interesting network data.

    • Computers allow us to simulate hypothetical or virtual networks, as well as real ones.

    • Learning basic computer literacy skills opens the door to infinite possibilities, e.g., file/folder operation, data entry, manipulation and modeling, information sharing and collaboration, and computer programming.

  6. 6.

    Networks help us compare a wide variety of systems.

    • Various kinds of systems, once represented as networks, can be compared to see how similar or different they are.

    • Certain network properties commonly appear in many seemingly unrelated systems. This implies that there may be some general network principles across disciplines.

    • Other network properties are quite different from systems to systems. These properties can help classify networks in different families and understand them differently.

    • Science has traditionally been conducted in separate disciplines. Networks can help go beyond disciplinary boundaries toward a more cross- or interdisciplinary understanding of the world.

    • Networks can help transfer knowledge from one discipline to another to make a breakthrough.

  7. 7.

    Network structures can influence their dynamics and vice versa.

    • Network structure means how parts are connected in a network.

    • Network dynamics means how things change over time in a network.

    • Network structures can influence their dynamics. Examples include the spread of diseases, behaviors or memes in a social network, and traffic patterns on the road network in a city.

    • Network dynamics can influence their structures. Examples include the creation of new following links in social media and construction of new roads to address traffic jams.

    • Network structures and dynamics often influence each other simultaneously.

1.3 Outreach Events

  • NetSci High has facilitated sending a group of high school students and teachers from New York City to NetSci 2011 in Budapest, Hungary; a group from Endwell and Vestal, NY to NetSci 2012 in Evanston, IL; and a group from Vestal, NY to NetSci 2014 in Berkeley, CA. In all of these travels, the high school student teams presented their work at poster sessions. High school student research has also been published in peer-reviewed journals such as PLOS One (Blansky et al. 2013).

  • Students and teachers from Newburgh Free Academy and Vestal High School presented posters at the IEEE ISEC conference at Princeton University in 2015 and 2016. NetSci High participating students and teachers have presented at the West Point Cadet Seminar on Network Science each year of NetSci High.

  • In 2016 NetSci High students and teachers participated in the US Science and Engineering Festival in Washington, D.C., presenting several hands-on activities related to the Network Literacy Essential Concepts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cramer, C.B., Sheetz, L. (2018). Secondary Student Mentorship and Research in Complex Networks: Process and Effects. In: Cramer, C., Porter, M., Sayama, H., Sheetz, L., Uzzo, S. (eds) Network Science In Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77237-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77237-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77236-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77237-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics