Skip to main content

Detecting Aggressive Behavior in Discussion Threads Using Text Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2017)

Abstract

The detection of aggressive behavior in online discussion communities is of great interest, due to the large number of users, especially of young age, who are frequently exposed to such behaviors in social networks. Research on cyberbullying prevention focuses on the detection of potentially harmful messages and the development of intelligent systems for the identification of verbal aggressiveness expressed with insults and threats. Text mining techniques are among the most promising tools used so far in the field of aggressive sentiments detection in short texts, such as comments, reviews, tweets etc. This article presents a novel approach which employs sentiment analysis at message level, but considers the whole communication thread (i.e., users discussions) as the context of the aggressive behavior. The suggested approach is able to detect aggressive, inappropriate or antisocial behavior, under the prism of the discussion context. Key aspects of the approach are the monitoring and analysis of the most recently published comments, and the application of text classification techniques for detecting whether an aggressive action actually emerges in a discussion thread. Thorough experimental validation of the suggested approach in a dataset for cyberbullying detection tasks demonstrates its applicability and advantages compared to other approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://sentiwordnet.isti.cnr.it/.

  2. 2.

    https://sites.google.com/site/alenaneviarouskaya/research-1/sentiful.

  3. 3.

    http://csea.phhp.ufl.edu/media/anewmessage.html.

  4. 4.

    http://liwc.wpengine.com/.

  5. 5.

    http://wndomains.fbk.eu/wnaffect.html.

  6. 6.

    http://sentic.net/downloads/.

  7. 7.

    Rule-based classifier, called BullyTracer, was used in [26] in the same dataset that we use in this work. However, any other classification method can be applied in this step.

  8. 8.

    The original dataset and the datasets we used in the current research can be downloaded from: https://goo.gl/wPrU2n.

  9. 9.

    The RBFClassifier implementation for Weka has been used.

  10. 10.

    The LibSVM implementation of Weka with default parameters.

  11. 11.

    Attribute Selected Classifier with PCA as attribute selection method and RBF classifier as classification method, was used.

References

  1. Katakis, I.M., Varlamis, I., Tsatsaronis, G.: PYTHIA: employing lexical and semantic features for sentiment analysis. In: Calders, T., Esposito, F., Hüllermeier, E., Meo, R. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8726, pp. 448–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44845-8_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Medhat, W., Hassan, A., Korashy, H.: Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: a survey. Ain Shams Eng. J. 5(4), 1093–1113 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Royen, K., Poels, K., Daelemans, W., Vandebosch, H.: Automatic monitoring of cyberbullying on social networking sites: from technological feasibility to desirability. Telemat. Inform. 32(1), 89–97 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore, M.J., Nakano, T., Enomoto, A., Suda, T.: Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(3), 861–867 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olweus, D.: Bullying at school: knowledge base and an effective intervention programa. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 794(1), 265–276 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yin, D., Xue, Z., Hong, L., Davison, B.D., Kontostathis, A., Edwards, L.: Detection of harassment on web 2.0. In: Proceedings of Content Analysis in the WEB 2.0 (CAW2.0) Workshop at WWW (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reynolds, K., Kontostathis, A., Edwards, L.: Using machine learning to detect cyberbullying. In: Proceedings of Machine Learning and Applications and Workshop (ICMLA), vol. 2, pp. 241–244. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dinakar, K., Reichart, R., Lieberman, H.: Modeling the detection of textual cyberbullying. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Social Mobile Web, at the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dadvar, M., Trieschnigg, D., de Jong, F.: Experts and machines against bullies: a hybrid approach to detect cyberbullies. In: Sokolova, M., van Beek, P. (eds.) AI 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8436, pp. 275–281. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06483-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Nahar, V., Al-Maskari, S., Li, X., Pang, C.: Semi-supervised learning for cyberbullying detection in social networks. In: Wang, H., Sharaf, M.A. (eds.) ADC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8506, pp. 160–171. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08608-8_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Hee, C., et al.: Detection and fine-grained classification of cyberbullying events. In: Proceedings of the Recent Advances in NLP Conference (RANLP), pp. 672–680 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dadvar, M., de Jong, F., Ordelman, R., Trieschnigg, D.: Improved cyberbullying detection using gender information. In: Proceedings of the Dutch-Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop (DIR), pp. 23–25 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mihaylov, T., Nakov, P.: Hunting for troll comments in news community forums. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), vol. 16, pp. 399–405 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joty, S., et al.: Global thread-level inference for comment classification in community question answering. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), vol. 15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rafiq, R.I., Han, H.H.R., Lv, Q., Mishra, S., Mattso, S.A.: Careful what you share in six seconds: Detecting cyberbullying instances in vine. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 617–622. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rafiq, R.I., Hosseinmardi, H., Han, R., Lv, Q., Mishra, S.: Investigating factors influencing the latency of cyberbullying detection (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05419

  17. Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., Tippett, N.: Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49(4), 376–385 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dooley, J.J., Pyżalski, J., Cross, D.: Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: a theoretical and conceptual review. J. Psychol. 217(4), 182–188 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grigg, D.W.: Cyber-aggression: definition and concept of cyberbullying. Aust. J. Guid. Couns. 20(02), 143–156 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Yang, P., Hussain, A., Durrani, T.: Merging senticnet and wordnet-affect emotion lists for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), vol. 2, pp. 1251–1255. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M.: Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguist. 37(2), 267–307 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61(12), 2544–2558 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., Bengio, Y.: Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: a deep learning approach. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 513–520 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, J.M., Jun, K.S., Zhu, X., Bellmore, A.: Learning from bullying traces in social media. In: Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pp. 656–666. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ekman, P.: An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6(3–4), 169–200 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bayzick, J., Kontostathis, A., Edwards, L.: Detecting the presence of cyberbullying using computer software. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Science (WebSci) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Tsatsaronis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ventirozos, F.K., Varlamis, I., Tsatsaronis, G. (2018). Detecting Aggressive Behavior in Discussion Threads Using Text Mining. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77115-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77116-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics