Abstract
Science has played a key role in the development of climate change policy. Although action has been slow to materialize, climate change is firmly on the policy agenda internationally and domestically in many countries across the world. Climate scientists have helped put the issue into policy agendas, and climate change science is expected to provide the basis for policy action on mitigation and adaptation. However, science and policy sometimes have an uneasy relationship, as highlighted by fraught political debates over climate change. Issues of uncertainty , complexity and politics all influence the interactions and result in a range of different roles for scientists. At the same time, it is not simply policy-makers wanting and using science: campaigners, industry, communities and a range of other stakeholders all want to use science to influence policy. The interactions are not one-way, but multifaceted, and the line between science, policy and politics can be increasingly blurred. As a result, collaborative, co-learning approaches are needed to improve the use of science in policy. Drawing on the authors’ research, this chapter will discuss the challenges faced at the boundaries between science and policy and highlight how collaboration and collective action might be deployed to manage the interface. This can both help researchers better design their research to support decision-making and help decision-makers and other stakeholders improve their use of science for evidence-based policy-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Althaus CE, Bridgman P, Davis G (2013) The Australian policy handbook, 5th edn. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW, Australia
Ambrizzi T, Araújo M, Meira Filho LG, da Silva Dias, PL, Wainer I (2012) Sumário Executivo do Volume 1 – Base Científica das Mudanças Climáticas. Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho 1 para o 1º Relatório de Avaliação Nacional do Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas. PBMC, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Avenier M-J, Nourry L (1999) Sciences of the artificial and knowledge production: the crucial role of intervention research in management sciences. Des Issues 15(2):55–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511842
Aylett A (2014) Progress and challenges in the urban governance of climate change: results of a global survey. MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Ascher W (2004) Scientific information and uncertainty: challenges for the use of science in policymaking. Sci Eng Ethics 10(3):437–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0002-z
Barnett J (2001) Adapting to climate change in Pacific Island Countries: the problem of uncertainty. World Dev 29(6):977–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00022-5
Beck U (1992) Risk society—towards a new modernity. Sage Publication, London
Beck U (2006) Living in the world risk society. Econ Soc 35(3):329–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140600844902
Bell S (2004) “Appropriate” policy knowledge, and institutional and governance implications. Austral J Public Admin 63(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00356.x
Bradshaw GA, Borchers JG (2000) Uncertainty as information: narrowing the science-policy gap. Conserv Ecol 4(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00174-040107
Bulkeley H (2010) Cities and the governing of climate change. Annu Rev Environ Resourc 35:229–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747
Bunn SE, Abal EG, Greenfield PF, Tarte DM (2007) Making the connection between healthy waterways and healthy catchments: South East Queensland, Australia. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 7(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2007.044
Bunting C, Renn O, Florin M-V (2007) Introduction to the IRGC risk governance framework. John Liner Review 21(2):7
Callon M (1999) The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Sci Technol Soc 4(1):81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189900400106
Caplan N (1979) The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. Am Behav Sci 22(3):459–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427902200308
Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8(2):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Cottingham R, Delfau KF, Garde P (2010) Managing diffuse water pollution in South East Queensland An analysis of the role of the healthy waterways partnership. International Water Centre, Brisbane
Dessai S, O’Brien K, Hulme M (2007) Editorial: on uncertainty and climate change. Global Environ Change 17(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.001
Di Giulio G, Ferreira LC (2013) Governança do risco: uma proposta para lidar com riscos ambientais no nível local. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente (UFPR) 28:29–39
Di Giulio G, Groves C, Monteiro M, Taddei R (2016) Communicating through vulnerability: knowledge politics, inclusion and responsiveness in responsible research and innovation (RRI). J Responsib Innov 3(2):92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1166036
Di Giulio GM, Serrao-Neumann S, Viglio JE, Ferreira LDC, Low Choy D (2014) Methodological proposals for research on risk and adaptation: experiences in Brazil and Australia. Ambiente & Sociedade (Online). 17(4):35–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-44ASOC895V1742014
Dye TR (2005) Understanding public policy, 11th edn. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA
Fischer F (1990) Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA
Fischer F (2009) Democracy and expertise: reorienting policy inquiry. Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, Democracy and Expertise. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282838.003.0006
Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
Grundmann R (2002) Transnational policy networks and the role of advocacy scientists: from ozone layer protection to climate change. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change “Global Environmental Change and the Nation State”, pp 405–414. http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/1496/
Guston DH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Human Values 26(4):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600401
Head BW (2008) Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Aust J Public Admin 67(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
Heazle M (2010) Uncertainty in policy making. Values and evidence in complex decisions, Eathscan, London
Huitema D, Turnhout E (2009) Working at the science–policy interface: a discursive analysis of boundary work at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Environ Politics 18(4):576–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903007427
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland
Jasanoff S (1990) The Fifth Branch. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
Jasanoff S (2003) (No?) Accounting for expertise. Sci Public Policy 30(3):157–162. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780542
Kasperson R (2011) Characterizing the science/practice gap. In: Kasperson R, Berberian M (eds) Integrating science and policy. Earthscan, London
Lackey RT (2007) Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conserv Biol 21(1):12–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00639.x
Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M (2001) Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Res Policy 30(2):333–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0
Leitch AM, Robinson CJ (2012) Shifting sands: uncertainty and a local community response to sea level rise policy in Australia. In: Measham T, Lockie S (eds) Risk and social theory in environmental management. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia
Lawrence J, Cornforth A, Barrett P (eds) (2011) Climate futures: pathways for society. New Zealand Climate Change Research Institute, Wellington, NZ
Leck H, Roberts D (2015) What lies beneath: understanding the invisible aspects of municipal climate change governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 13:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.02.004
Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasad V (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Climate Change 2:789–794. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1614
Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ (2016) Climate information and water management: building adaptive capacity or business as usual? In: Conca K, Weinthal E (eds) The Oxford handbook of water politics and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Marston G (2003) Tampering with the evidence: a critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. Drawing Board Aust Rev Public Aff 3(3):143–163
Michaels S (2009) Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings. Environ Sci Policy 12(7):994–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.05.002
Miller C (2001) Hybrid management: boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Sci Technol Human Values 26(4):478–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600405
Morgan EA (2014a) Science & sustainability: the use of science and the science–policy interface in sustainable water resource management. In: PhD Thesis, Griffith University, Australia
Morgan EA (2014b) Science in sustainability: a theoretical framework for understanding the science-policy interface in sustainable water resource management. Int J Sustain Policy Pract 9(2):37–54. http://ijspp.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.274/prod.74
Morgan EA, Grant-Smith DCC (2015) Tales of science and defiance: the case for co-learning and collaboration in bridging the science/emotion divide in water recycling debates. J Environ Plan Manag 58(10):1770–1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.954691
Moss RH (2007) Improving information for managing an uncertain future climate. Global Environ Change 17(1):4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.002
Nutley S, Walter I, Davies HTO (2003) From knowing to doing: a framework for understanding the evidence-into-practice Agenda. Evaluation 9(2):125–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389003009002002
Oreskes N (2004) Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it? Environ Sci Policy 7(5):369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.002
Oreskes N, Conway EM (2011) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing, NY, USA
Pielke RA Jr (2002) Policy, politics and perspective. Nature 416:2001–2002
Pielke RA Jr (2007) the honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London
Rhodes RAW (2007) Understanding governance: ten years on. Organ Stud 28(8):1243–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
Rijke J, Brown R, Zevenbergen C, Ashley R, Farrelly M, Morison P, van Herk S (2012) Fit-for-purpose governance: a framework to make adaptive governance operational. Environ Sci Policy 22:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.010
Romero-Lankao P, Hardoy G, Hughes S, Gnatz D, Rosas-Huerta A, Borquez R (2015) Multilevel governance and institutional capacity for climate change responses in Latin American Cities. In: Johnson C, Toly N, Schroeder H (eds) The urban climate change—rethinking the role of cities in the global climate change. Routledge, NY, USA and London, UK
Ruth M, Coelho D (2007) Understanding and managing the complexity of urban systems under climate change. Clim Policy 7(4):17–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2007.9685659
Ryan D (2015) From commitment to action: a literature review on climate policy implementation at city level. Clim Change 131(4):519–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1402-6
Sarewitz DR (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7(5):385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
Sarewitz DR, Pielke RA Jr (2007) The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 10(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.001
Serrao-Neumann S, Di Giulio GM, Ferreira LC, Low Choy D (2016) Advancing climate change adaptation and climate risk understanding through intervention research: cases studies from Brazil and Australia. In: Knieling J (ed) Climate adaptation governance in cities and regions: theoretical fundamentals and practical evidence. Wiley, New York, pp 113–129
Serrao-Neumann S, Di Giulio GM, Ferreira LC, Low Choy D (2013) Climate change adaptation: Is there a role for intervention research? Futures 53:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.08.002
Slob AFL, Rijnveld M, Chapman AS, Strosser P (2007) Challenges of linking scientific knowledge to river basin management policy: AquaTerra as a case study. Environ Pollut 148(3):867–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.048
Spruijt P, Knol AB, Vasileiadou E, Devilee J, Lebret E, Petersen AC (2014) Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: a literature review. Environ Sci Policy 40:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002
Swart R, Bernstein L, Ha-Duong M, Petersen A (2008) Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Clim Change 92(1–2):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9444-7
Turnhout E, Stuiver M, Klostermann J, Harms B, Leeuwis C (2013) New roles of science in society: different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Sci Public Policy 40(3):354–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs114
van Buuren A, Edelenbos J (2004) Conflicting knowledge: why is joint knowledge production such a problem? Sci Public Policy 31(4):289–299
Weingart P (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Public Policy 26(3):151–161. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782437
Weiss CH (1979) The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev 39(5):426–431
Wilsdom J, Wynne B, Stilgoe J (2005) The public value of science: or how to ensure that science really matters. Demos, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morgan, E.A., Di Giulio, G.M. (2018). Science and Evidence-Based Climate Change Policy: Collaborative Approaches to Improve the Science–Policy Interface. In: Serrao-Neumann, S., Coudrain, A., Coulter, L. (eds) Communicating Climate Change Information for Decision-Making. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74669-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74669-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74668-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74669-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)