Abstract
In mathematics education, researchers often talk about mathematical creativity. However, we see a lack of research on the question of whether such an ability exists for mathematics in general; or whether mathematical creativity should rather be viewed subdomain-specifically; for instance, in the contexts of geometry, algebra, or arithmetic separately. In this paper, we present results of an empirical study investigating upper secondary school students’ performances in Multiple Solution Tasks (MSTs). First, we elaborate on the notion of appropriateness and its influence on the investigation of creativity; and illustrate implications based on the given data. Second, we give an insight into students’ performances along three different MSTs from different mathematical domains and point out correlations between students’ performances in two domains: geometry and algebra. Our results do not support the construct of domain-specific or subdomain-specific creativity, but indicate that mathematical creativity should be considered task-specifically.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bailin, S. (1988). Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Bruder, R. (2001). Kreativ sein wollen, dürfen und können. ml – mathematik lehren, (106), 46–50.
Foth, M., & van der Meer, E. (2013). Mathematische Leistungsfähigkeit: Prädiktoren überdurchschnittlicher Leistungen in der gymnasialen Oberstufe. In T. Fritzlar & F. Käpnick (Eds.), Mathematische Begabungen: Denkansätze zu einem komplexen Themenfeld aus verschiedenen Perspektiven (pp. 191–220). Münster: WTM.
Ghiselin, B. (1985). The creative process: A symposium. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hadamard, J. (1954). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York: Dover Publications.
Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 59–74.
Hershkovitz, S., Peled, I., & Littler, G. (2009). Mathematical creativity and giftedness in elementary school: Task and teacher promoting creativity for all. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 255–270). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Joklitschke, J., Rott, B., & Schindler, M. (2017, Accepted). The challenges of identifying giftedness in upper secondary classes. In Proceedings of the 41th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Singapore.
Kattou, M., Christou, C., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2015). Mathematical creativity or general creativity? In K. Kaiser & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Prague, Czech Republic (pp. 1016–1023).
Kattou, M., Kontoyianni, K., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2013). Connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 45, 167–181.
Kneller, G. F. (1965). The art and science of creativity. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Leikin, R. (2013). Evaluating mathematical creativity: The interplay between multiplicity and insight. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(4), 385–400.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference? ZDM—Mathematics Education, 45, 183–197.
Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 45, 159–166.
Leikin, R., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2017). Advances in mathematics education. Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond. Cham, S.L.: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3.
Leuders, T. (2010). Kreativitätsfördernder Mathematikunterricht. In T. Leuders (Ed.), Mathematik-Didaktik: Praxishandbuch für die Sekundarstufe I und II (5th ed., pp. 135–147). Berlin: Cornelsen Scriptor.
Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 73–90.
Liljedahl, P. (2013). Illumination: An affective experience? ZDM, 45, 253–265.
Mann, E. L. (2005). Mathematical creativity and school mathematics: Indicators of mathematical creativity in middle school students. Dissertation. University of Connecticut, USA. http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/Dissertations/Eric%20Mann.pdf. Accessed 28 September 2015.
Novotná, J. (2017). Problem solving through heuristic strategies as a way to make all pupils engaged. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 29–44). Singapore: PME.
Poincaré, H. (1948). Science and method. New York: Dover.
Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10(2), 67–75.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
Rott, B., & Schindler, M. (2017). Mathematische Begabung in den Sekundarstufen erkennen und angemessen aufgreifen. Ein Konzept für Lehrerfortbildungen. [Recognizing and dealing with mathematical giftedness on upper sedondary level. A conception for in-service teacher training] In J. Leuders, M. Lehn, T. Leuders, S. Ruwisch, & S. Prediger (Hrsg.), Mit Heterogenität im Mathematikunterricht umgehen lernen. Konzepte und Perspektiven für eine zentrale Anforderung an die Lehrerbildung (S. 235–245). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2017a). Eye-tracking and its domain-specific interpretation. A stimulated recall study on eye movements in geometrical tasks. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 153–160). Singapore: PME.
Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2017b). Eye-tracking as a tool for investigating mathematical creativity from a process-view. In D. Pitta-Pantazi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness (MCG 10) (pp. 45–50). Nicosia, Cyprus: Department of Education, University of Cyprus.
Schindler, M., Lilienthal, A. J., Chadalavada, R., & Ă–gren, M. (2016). Creativity in the eye of the student. Refining investigations of mathematical creativity using eye-tracking goggles. In C. CsĂkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (Vol. 4, pp. 163–170). Szeged, Hungary: PME.
Sheffield, L. J. (2009). Developing mathematical creativity—Questions may be the answer. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 87–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sheffield, L. J. (2013). Creativity and school mathematics: Some modest observations. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 45, 325–332.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 29, 75–80.
Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2017). When mathematics meets real objects: How does creativity interact with expertise in problem solving and posing? In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond (pp. 75–103), Advances in Mathematics Education. Cham, S.L.: Springer.
Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: Implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM, 49, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0820-x.
Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20–36.
Sriraman, B. (2009). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 41(1–2), 13–27.
Sriraman, B., Haavold, P., & Lee, K. (2014). Creativity in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 109–115). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Wallas, G. (2014). Art of thought. Kent, England: Solis Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schindler, M., Joklitschke, J., Rott, B. (2018). Mathematical Creativity and Its Subdomain-Specificity. Investigating the Appropriateness of Solutions in Multiple Solution Tasks. In: Singer, F. (eds) Mathematical Creativity and Mathematical Giftedness. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73155-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73156-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)