Abstract
We propose an introductory study of gravity driven Stokesian flow past the wavy bottom, based on Adler’s et al. papers. In examples the waviness is described by a sinus function and its amplitude is small, up to O(ε 2). A correction to Hagen-Poiseuille’s type free-flow solution is found. A contribution of capillary surface tension is discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
G.A. Chechkin, A. Friedman, A.L. Piatnitski, The boundary-value problem in domains with very rapidly oscillating boundary. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 231(1), 213–234 (1999)
R. Czapla, V.V. Mityushev, W. Nawalaniec, Macroscopic Conductivity of Curvilinear Channels (Department of Computer Science and Computational Methods, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, 2017, preprint)
F.M. Esquivelzeta-Rabell, B. Figueroa-Espinoza, D. Legendre, P. Salles, A note on the onset of recirculation in a 2D Couette flow over a wavy bottom. Phys. Fluids 27(1), 014108-1–014108-14 (2015)
K. Evangelos, The impact of vegetation on the characteristics of the flow in an inclined open channel using the piv method. Water Resour. Ocean Sci. 1(1), 1–6 (2012)
W. Huai, W. Wang, Y. Zeng, Two-layer model for open channel flow with submerged flexible vegetation. J. Hydraul. Res. 51(6), 708–718 (2013)
E. Kubrak, J. Kubrak, P.M. Rowiński, Application of one-dimensional model to calculate water velocity distributions over elastic elements simulating Canadian waterweed plants (Elodea canadensis). Acta Geophys. 61(1), 194–210 (2013)
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics. Course of Theoretical Physics (transl. from the Russian by J.B. Sykes, W.H. Reid), vol. 6, 2nd edn. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987)
A.E. Malevich, V.V. Mityushev, P.M. Adler, Stokes flow through a channel with wavy walls. Acta Mech. 182(3–4), 151–182 (2006)
A.E. Malevich, V.V. Mityushev, P.M. Adler, Couette flow in channels with wavy walls. Acta Mech. 197(3), 247–283 (2008)
A.E. Malevich, V.V. Mityushev, P.M. Adler, Electrokinetic phenomena in wavy channels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 345, 72–87 (2010)
G. Sobin. Luminous Debris: Reflecting on Vestige in Provence and Languedoc (University of California Press, Berkeley, 2000)
R. Wojnar, W. Bielski, Flow in the canal with plants on the bottom. In Complex Analysis and Potential Theory with Applications. Proceedings of the 9th ISAAC Congress, August, 2013, Kraków, ed. by T.A. Azerogly, A. Golberg, S.V. Rogosin (Cambridge Scientific Publishers, Cambridge, 2014), pp. 167–183
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge many helpful suggestions from Professor Vladimir V. Mityushev.
This work was partially supported within statutory activities No 3841/E-41/S/2017 of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Natural Units for the Problem
Let the module of velocity of the main stream can be characterized by the quantity u, and the geometrical properties of the flow can be denoted by l. Then any flow is specified by three parameters u, l and the viscosity η. The only one dimensionless quantity which can be formed from the above three is called Reynolds’ number
Navier-Stokes’ equation is considerably simplified in the case of flow with small Reynolds number R. For steady flow of an incompressible fluid with constant viscosity η this equation reads
The term (v ⋅∇)v is of the order of magnitude of (u 2/l), and the quantity (η/ρ) Δv is of the order of ηu/(ρl 2). The ratio of two is just Reynolds’ number R. Hence the term (v ⋅∇)v may be neglected for small R. Then the equation of motion reduces to a linear equation
known as Stokes’ equation, which together with the equation of continuity (1) and appropriate boundary conditions completely determines the motion, [7].
We notice yet that the smallness of R is not necessary to linearize Stokes’ equation in the case of laminar flow with the velocity v = (v, 0, 0), if v does not depend on x 1. In this case the nonlinear term at the left hand side of Eq. (A.2) identically vanishes.
In analogy with Reynolds’ number R, we take as a natural for this problem the depth h of the fluid as the unit of length x̆. As the unit of velocity v̆ we accept three times repeated the mean velocity 3 ⋅ v mean. The natural unit of pressure p̆ is the x component of the hydrostatic pressure at the bottom, what assures the unit value of the x component of the body force. Thus, cf. Fig. 1,
Consequently, the unit of time is
Then new variables \(\widetilde x, \widetilde v\) and \(\widetilde p\) are introduced:
In the new variables the zeroth approximation of Stokes’ equation has the form
cf. Eqs. (1.5).
We take into consideration a typical laboratory experiment with h = 10 cm. If we approximate the gravity acceleration g as 1000 cm/s2, then for the water with the density ρ = 1 g/cm3 the relation between the natural units and the SI units is
In peculiar, we have also
and
Then, the viscosity of the water in these new units is equal to one
In our example we accept
what is an order of the mean slope of the great world rivers profile, cf. the Appendix 3. Then
In these units, we find
or
It is conspicuous for this angle of slope the smallness of the pressure unit. Note that p̆ = 1 dyn/cm2 = 0.1 Pa ≈ 10−6 atm.
As it was mentioned above, the viscosity of water at 20∘C is almost exactly 1 cP, and equals 1 in our natural units, cf. Eq. (A.8).
Appendix 2: Elaboration of the Example
1.1 General Solution
By equation (2.7) for m = 1 we have
where α 1, β 1, and γ 1 are given by Eqs. (3.8)–(3.10) and the superscripts 1 were omitted. After Eqs. (3.7) we find
1.2 Boundary Conditions for the Example
If the expansions (2.4) are limited up to O(ε 2), only the terms with m = 0, 1 must be left, and the boundary conditions (2.5) reduce to the following ones
where ≐ means the asymptotic equality with the accuracy O(ε 2). This symbol was applied in [2].
Next, we submit Fourier’s series (2.7) into Maclaurin’s expansions (2.5), taken at the bottom boundary up to O(ε 2) approximation, and receive
The subscripts and coefficients at x are put s = 1. Above, u 0(x, 0) and v 0(x, 0) are known and equal to zero, while p 0(x, 0) must be found from a boundary problem at the free surface of the flowing stream.
From the solutions (2.12)–(2.13) we get
Here also the superscripts at the coefficients C 1, C 2, C 3 and C 4 were omitted. Substituting (A.13) into (A.12) gives
1.3 Finding Constants
At the bottom
and
where both \(u(x, \varepsilon \,a \, \cos x) \) and \(v(x, \varepsilon \,a \, \cos x) \) are given by (A.16). Also, in good approximation (if surface undulations were neglected)
These conditions should be satisfied separately at each power of ε. We apply the integral relations
and successively obtain.
and
After the set (3.2) and Eq. (1.9) we have
To assure the value p = p A at y = 1 we should have
If we assume that transversal velocity component v vanishes at the stream surface (y = 1)
Comparing (A.22), (A.24) and (A.25) we observed that
Moreover,
Appendix 3: Slopes of the River Beds: Typical Examples
What concerns the lower Nile river, the city Aswan is elevated 194 m above the sea level, and from this town to the Mediterranean sea the river flows about 1200 km yet.
What concerns the lower Amazon river, the city Manaus is on 92 m elevation and 1500 km away from the Atlantic ocean. In approximation the mean slope of the Amazon profile is
The similar numbers are obtained for other rivers such as Volga, Oka, Mississippi and Wisła (Vistula) below Warsaw. The mean slope of the Wisłok river below Rzeszów until the mouth in Dȩbno is about 14 m / 60 km ≈ 2 × 10−4.
For comparison, the slope of the bridge Pont du Gard, which descends 2.5 cm in 456 m has the approximate value of the gradient 0.5 × 10−4. The bridge is part of the Nîmes aqueduct. The aqueduct was built probably around the reign of the emperor Claudius (41–54 AD). It required constant maintenance by circitores, workers responsible for the aqueduct’s upkeep, who crawled along the conduit scrubbing the walls clean and removing any vegetation, cf. [11].
Appendix 4: Estimation of the Upper Waviness
After the formula for differentiation of a definite integral whose limits are functions of the differential variable, Eq. (4.1) can be written in the form
Here
After integration we get
or
Keeping the terms of O(ε) and O(ζ) only we have
Within this accuracy we get
and
If we leave out the term I 1, we have equality I 2 + I 3 = 0, which, after integration gives \( 3 \zeta + \zeta ^2 = \varepsilon \cdot \left ( \mathrm {e} \, - \, {1}/{\mathrm {e}} \right ) \cos x, \) and after linearization
where e ≈ 2.71828. In this case O(ζ)≃ O(ε).
Appendix 5: Young-Laplace’s Equation
Young-Laplace’s equation is a statement of normal stress balance for static fluids meeting at an interface
where p 1 − p 2 is the pressure difference across the fluid interface, σ is the surface tension, and R 1 and R 2 are the principal radii of the interface surface curvature. In our case p 1 = p is the pressure inside of the liquid, and p 2 = p A is the atmospheric pressure. Young-Laplace’s equation can be written as
The value of surface tension of water against air σ = 72.5 g/s2, and in our natural units, cf. the Appendix 1,
For the droplet of radius 1 mm, p − p A = 0.0014 atm, and for the droplet of radius 0.1 mm, p − p A = 0.0144 atm, with p meaning the pressure inside of the liquid, and p A is the atmospheric pressure.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wojnar, R., Bielski, W. (2018). Gravity Driven Flow Past the Bottom with Small Waviness. In: Drygaś, P., Rogosin, S. (eds) Modern Problems in Applied Analysis. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72640-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72640-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72639-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72640-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)