Skip to main content

A Hybrid Consolidant of Nano-Hydroxyapatite and Silica Inspired from Patinas for Stone Conservation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Materials for the Conservation of Stone

Abstract

A hybrid consolidant with high affinity to carbonaceous substrates was synthesized by adding synthesized nano-hydroxyapatite into TEOS sol, while for the first time, amylamine (CH3(CH2)4NH2) was used as a surfactant, providing an efficient means of protecting gels from cracking by reducing the capillary pressure. Amylamine is characterized by a short chain amine molecule, therefore, the amphiphilicity increased by the hydrophilic functional groups and hydrophobic tail groups without causing the formation of any amphiphilic molecule clusters. The hydroxyapatite was selected on the grounds of the weathering resistance often encountered in well-preserved monument surfaces (patinas) and attributed to the combination of hydroxyapatite, with calcium oxalate, and silica. The role of hydroxyapatite and amylamine in the silica structure was further examined by comparing the synthesized consolidant with other nanocomposites containing TEOS, TEOS and hydroxyapatite, and TEOS and amylamine as basic reagents. The synthesized products have been characterized and evaluated for their effectiveness as strengthening agents on limestone that is widely used in the historic and modern architectural structures in the Mediterranean basin. Generally, the nanocomposite-treated stone demonstrated an improvement in hygric properties, drilling resistance, and tensile strength due to the crack-free structure of the nanocomposite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sassoni E, Franzoni E, Pigino B, Scherer GW, Naidu S. Consolidation of calcareous and siliceous sandstones by hydroxyapatite: comparison with a TEOS-based consolidant. J Cult Herit. 2013;14:103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sassoni E, Naidu S, Scherer GW. The use of hydroxyapatite as a new inorganic consolidant for damaged carbonate stones. J Cult Herit. 2011;12:346–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sassoni E, Franzoni E, Graziani G, Sagripanti F. Limestone resistance to sodium sulfate degradation after consolidation by hydroxyapatite and TEOS. In: 3rd International Conference on Salt Weathering of Buildings and Stone Sculptures; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naidu S, Liu C, Scherer GW. New techniques in limestone consolidation: hydroxyapatite-based consolidant and the acceleration of hydrolysis of silicate-based consolidants. J Cult Hert. 2015;16(1):94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Q, Zhang B. Synthesis and characterization of a novel biomaterial for the conservation of historic stone building and sculptures. Mater Sci Forum. 2011;675–677:317–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martín-Gil J, Martín-Gil FJ, del Carmen Ramos-Sánchez M, Martín-Ramos P. The orange-brown patina of Salisbury Cathedral (West Porch) surfaces: evidence of its man-made origin. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2005;12(5):285–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lazzarini L, Salvadori O. A reassessment of the formation of the patina called scialbatura. Stud Conserv. 1989;34:20–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sassoni E, Graziani G, Franzoni E. An innovative phosphate-based consolidant for limestone. Part 1: effectiveness and compatibility in comparison with ethyl silicate. Constr Build Mater. 2016;102:918–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sassoni E, Franzoni E. Consolidation of Carrara marble by hydroxyapatite and behaviour after thermal ageing. In: Built heritage: monitoring conservation management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brinker CJ, Scherer GW. Sol-gel science: the physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing. Boston, MA: Academic Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim EK, Won J, Do J, Kim SD, Kang YS. Effects of silica nanoparticle and GPTMS addition on TEOS-based stone consolidants. J Cult Herit. 2009;10:214–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scherer GW, Wheeler GS. Silicate consolidants for stone. Key Eng Mater. 2009;391:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mosquera MJ, de los Santos DM, Montes A, Valdez-Castro L. New nanomaterials for consolidating stone. Langmuir. 2008;24:2772–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosquera MJ, Montes A, de los Santos DM. Method of strengthening stone and other construction materials. US2008/0209847 A1; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mosquera MJ, de los Santos DM, Valdez-Castro L, Esquivias L. New route for producing crack-free xerogels: obtaining uniform pore size. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2008;354:645–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinho P, Mosquera MJ. Titania-silica nanocomposite photocatalysts with application in stone self-cleaning. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115(46):22851–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yener DO, Sindel J, Randall CA, Adai JH. Synthesis of nanosized silver platelets in octylamine-water bilayer systems. Langmuir. 2002;18:8692–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo X, Xiao P. Effects of solvents on properties of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite produced from hydrothermal process. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2006;26:3383–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Poinern GJE, Brundavanam R, Thi Le X, Djordjevic S, Prokic M, Fawcett D. Thermal and ultrasonic influence in the formation of nanometer scale hydroxyapatite bio-ceramic. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:2083–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu DM, Troczynski T, Tseng WJ. Water-based sol-gel synthesis of hydroxyapatite: process development. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1721–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Verganelaki A, Kapridaki C, Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki P. Modified tetraethoxysilane with nano-calcium oxalate in one-pot synthesis for protection of building materials. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2015;54(29):7195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. UNI EN 15803:2010. Conservation of cultural property—test methods—determination of water vapour permeability (dp). Official Italian Version of EN 15803:2009 European Standard Emitted by CEN, Technical Body CEN/TC 346—Conservation of Cultural Property. Date of Availability (DAV) 2009-12-09.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hench LL, West JK. The sol-gel process. Chem Rev. 1990;90:33–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubio F, Rubio J, Oteo JL. A FT-IR study of the hydrolysis of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS). Spectrosc Lett. 1998;31:199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lucovsky G, Wong CK, Pollard WB. Vibrational properties of glasses: intermediate range order. J Non-Cryst Solids. 1983;59-60:839–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prado AG, Airoldi C. Different neutral surfactant template extraction routes for synthetic hexagonal mesoporous silicas. J Mater Chem. 2002;12:3823–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Orcel G, Phalippou GJ, Hench LL. Structural changes of silica xerogels during low temperature dehydration. J Non-Cryst Solids. 1986;88:114–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Téllez L, Rubio J, Rubio F, Morales E, Oteo JL. FT-IR study of the hydrolysis and polymerization of tetraethyl orthosilicate and polydimethyl siloxane in the presence of tetrabutyl orthotitanate. Spectrosc Lett. 2004;37:11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alobeedallaha H, Ellis JL, Rohanizadehc R, Costera H, Dehghania F. Preparation of nanostructured hydroxyapatite in organic solvents for clinical applications. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2011;25(1):12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pramanik A, Bhattacharjee K, Mitra MK, Das GC, Duari B. A mechanistic study of the initial stage of the sintering of sol-gel derived silica nanoparticles. Int J Mod Eng Res. 2013;3(2):1066–70.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang X, Li Y, Lv G, Zuo Y, Mu Y. Thermal and crystallization studies of nano-hydroxyapatite reinforced polyamide 66 biocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab. 2006;91:1202–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sasse HS, Snethlage R. Methods for the evaluation of stone conservation treatments. In: Baer NS, Snethlage R, editors. Report of Dahlem workshop on saving our architectural heritage, Berlin; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pagona Maravelaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maravelaki, P., Verganelaki, A. (2018). A Hybrid Consolidant of Nano-Hydroxyapatite and Silica Inspired from Patinas for Stone Conservation. In: Hosseini, M., Karapanagiotis, I. (eds) Advanced Materials for the Conservation of Stone. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72260-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics