Abstract
Classifying patents by the technology areas they pertain is important to enable information search and facilitate policy analysis and socio-economic studies. Based on the OECD Triadic Patent Family database, this study constructs a cohort network based on the grouping of IPC subclasses in the same patent families, and a citation network based on citations between subclasses of patent families citing each other. This paper presents a systematic analysis approach which obtains naturally formed network clusters identified using a Lumped Markov Chain method, extracts community keys traceable over time, and investigates two important community characteristics: consistency and changing trends. The results are verified against several other methods, including a recent research measuring patent text similarity. The proposed method contributes to the literature a network-based approach to study the endogenous community properties of an exogenously devised classification system. The application of this method may improve accuracy and efficiency of the IPC search platform and help detect the emergence of new technologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arts, S., Cassiman, B., Gomez, J.C., Cassiman, B., Gomez, J.C.: Text matching to measure patent similarity (2017)
Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008(10), P10008 (2008)
Boyack, K., Börner, K., Klavans, R.: Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics 79(1), 45–60 (2008)
Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., Börner, K.: Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64(3), 351–374 (2005)
Dernis, H., Khan, M.: Triadic Patent Families Methodology (2004). https://doi.org/10.1787/443844125004
Foglia, P.: Patentability search strategies and the reformed IPC: a patent office perspective. World Pat. Inf. 29(1), 33–53 (2007)
Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M.: Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econ., 16–38 (2005)
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F.M., Vopel, K.: Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Res. Policy 32(8), 1343–1363 (2003)
Harris, C.G., Arens, R., Srinivasan, P.: Comparison of IPC and USPC classification systems in patent prior art searches. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Patent Information Retrieval, pp. 27–32. ACM (2010)
Lai, K.K., Wu, S.J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Inf. Process. Manag. 41(2), 313–330 (2005)
Lai, R., D’ Amour, A., Yu, A., Sun, Y., Torvik, V., Fleming, L.: Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US. Pat. Invent. Database, 1–38 (2011)
Lambiotte, R., Delvenne, J.C., Barahona, M.: Laplacian dynamics and multiscale modular structure in networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.1770 (2008)
Marie-Julie, J.M.: Searching in FlowchartsA PD Toolsdoc Pilot Project at the Borderline Between Text and Image to Access the Most Important Features of an Invention. EPO internal publication (2005)
Miranda, F., Doraiswamy, H., Lage, M., Zhao, K., Gonçalves, B., Wilson, L., Hsieh, M., Silva, C.T.: Urban pulse: capturing the rhythm of cities. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 23(1), 791–800 (2017)
OECD: OECD Patent Statistics Manual, 1 edn. OECD Publications, France (2009). http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oecd-patent-statistics-manual_9789264056442-en
OECD: OECD patent databases - OECD (2017). http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm
Piccardi, C.: Finding and testing network communities by lumped Markov chains. PLoS ONE 6(11) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027028
Squicciarini, M., Dernis, H., Criscuolo, C.: Measuring patent quality: indicators of technological and economic value. OECD Sci. Technol. Ind. Work. Pap. (03), 70 (2013). http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/measuring-patent-quality_5k4522wkw1r8-en
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.: University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of invention. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 5(1), 19–50 (1997)
Veefkind, V., Hurtado-Albir, J., Angelucci, S., Karachalios, K., Thumm, N.: A new EPO classification scheme for climate change mitigation technologies. World Pat. Inf. 34(2), 106–111 (2012)
WIPO: IPC 2016.01 (2016). http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/ITsupport/Version20160101/
WIPO: IPC Definitions_20160101 (2016). http://www.wipo.int/ipc/itos4ipc/ITSupport_and_download_area/
WIPO: About the International Patent Classification (2017). http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/preface.html
WIPO: Guide to the International Patent Classification (2017). http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/classifications/ipc/en/guide/guide_ipc.pdf
Yoo, H., Ramanathan, C., Barcelon-Yang, C.: Intellectual property management of biosequence information from a patent searching perspective. World Pat. Inf. 27(3), 203–211 (2005)
Yoon, B., Park, Y.: A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 15(1), 37–50 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gao, Y., Zhu, Z., Riccaboni, M. (2018). Consistency and Trends of Technological Innovations: A Network Approach to the International Patent Classification Data. In: Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Karsai, M., Musolesi, M. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications VI. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2017. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 689. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_60
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72149-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72150-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)