Abstract
In this chapter, the Handbook editors introduce the emerging field of Critical Physical Geography. We explain its core tenets and its primary methodological principles and epistemological assumptions. We address intellectual and practical barriers to the kind of careful integrative eco-social research that typifies Critical Physical Geography and also the reasons why it is worth overcoming those barriers. After an overview of the structure of the Handbook, we close with a discussion of why the field of Geography is home to this effort to integrate attention to power relations and their material impacts with deep knowledge of particular biophysical systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashmore, Peter, and Belinda Dodson. 2017. Urbanizing physical geography. The Canadian Geographer 61 (1): 102–106.
Barron, E.S., C. Sthultz, D. Hurley, and A. Pringle. 2015. Names matter: Interdisciplinary research on taxonomy and nomenclature for ecosystem management. Progress in Physical Geography 39 (5): 640–660.
Barry, A., and G. Born. 2013. Interdisciplinarity: Reconfiguration of the social and natural sciences. London: Routledge.
Bhaskar, R. 1975. A realist theory of science. London: Verso.
———. 1979. The possibility of naturalism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Blaikie, P. 1985. The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Blaikie, P., and H. Brookfield. 1987. Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.
Blue, B., and G. Brierley. 2016. ‘But what do you measure?’Prospects for a constructive Critical Physical Geography. Area 48: 190–197.
Bracken, L.J., and E. Oughton, eds. 2009a. Special issue: Interdisciplinarity within and beyond geography. Area 41 (4): 371–481.
———. 2009b. Interdisciplinary research: Framing and reframing. Area 41 (4): 385–394.
Castree, N. 2014. The Anthropocene and the environmental humanities: Extending the conversation. Environmental Humanities 5: 233–260.
Clifford, N.J. 2002. The future of geography: When the whole is less than the sum of its parts. Geoforum 33 (4): 431–436.
Cullum, C., K.H. Rogers, G. Brierley, and E.T. Witkowski. 2016. Ecological classification and mapping for landscape management and science: Foundations for the description of patterns and processes. Progress in Physical Geography 40 (1): 38–65.
Davis, D.K. 2007. Resurrecting the granary of Rome: Environmental history and French colonial expansion in North Africa. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Doyle, M.W., J. Singh, R. Lave, and M.M. Robertson. 2015. The morphology of streams restored for market and nonmarket purposes: Insights from a mixed natural-social science approach. Water Resources Research 51 (7): 5603–5622.
Engel-Di Mauro, S. 2014. Ecology, soils, and the left: An ecosocial approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Feyerabend, P. 1978. Science in a free society. London: Routledge.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Gordon, N. 1995. Summary of technical testimony in the Colorado water division 1 trial. Overview; January–December 1990. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Goudie, A.S. 1986. The integration of human and physical geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 11 (4): 454–458.
Hall, K.L., A.L. Vogel, B.A. Stipelman, D. Stokols, G. Morgan, and S. Gehlert. 2012. A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: Goals, team processes, and strategies. Behavioral Translational Medicine 2 (4): 415–430.
Harrison, S., D. Massey, K. Richards, F. Magilligan, N. Thrift, and B. Bender. 2004. Thinking across the divide: Perspectives on the conversations between Physical and Human Geography. Area 36 (4): 435–442.
Harrison, S., D. Massey, and K. Richards. 2006. Complexity and emergence (another conversation). Area 38 (4): 465–471.
———, eds. 2008. Special issue: Conversations across the divide. Geoforum 39 (2): 549–686.
Harvey, D. 1972. Revolutionary and counter revolutionary theory in Geography and the problem of ghetto formation. Antipode 4 (2): 110–125.
Hatvany, M., D. Cayer, and A. Parent. 2015. Interpreting salt marsh dynamics: Challenging scientific paradigms. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (5): 1041–1060.
Hecht, S. 1985. Environment, development and politics: Capital accumulation and the livestock sector in Eastern Amazonia. World Development 13 (6): 663–684.
Holifield, R., and M. Day. 2017. A framework for a Critical Physical Geography of ‘sacrifice zones’: Physical landscapes and discursive spaces of frac sand mining in western Wisconsin. Geoforum 85: 269–279.
Lane, S.N. 2017. Slow science, the geographical expedition and Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer 61: 84–101.
Laris, P., M. Koné, S. Dadashi, and F. Dembele. 2017. The early/late fire dichotomy: Time for a reassessment of Aubréville’s savanna fire experiments. Progress in Physical Geography 41 (1): 68–94.
Lave, R., and B. Lutz. 2014. Hydraulic fracturing: A Critical Physical Geography review. Geography Compass 8 (10): 739–754.
Lave, R., M.W. Wilson, E. Barron, C. Biermann, M. Carey, C. Duvall, L. Johnson, et al. 2014. Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer 58 (1): 1–10.
Massey, D. 1999. Space-time, ‘science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 24 (3): 261–276.
McClintock, N. 2015. A Critical Physical Geography of urban soil contamination. Geoforum 65: 69–85.
Munroe, D., K. McSweeney, J.L. Olson, and B. Mansfield. 2014. Using economic geography to reinvigorate land-change science. Geoforum 52 (1): 12–21.
Penny, D., G. Williams, J. Gillespie, and R. Khem. 2016. ‘Here be dragons’: Integrating scientific data and place-based observation for environmental management. Applied Geography 73: 38–46.
Phillips, J.D. 2007. The perfect landscape. Geomorphology 84 (3–4): 159–169.
Ramadier, T. 2004. Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures 36: 423–439.
Sarmiento, F.O., J.T. Ibarra, A. Barreau, J.C. Pizarro, R. Rozzi, J.A. González, and L.M. Frolich. 2017. Applied montology using critical biogeography in the Andes. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (2): 416–428.
Sayre, N.F. 2015. The Coyote-Proof Pasture Experiment: How fences replaced predators and labor on US rangelands. Progress in Physical Geography 39 (5): 576–593.
Sherman, D. 1996. Fashion in geomorphology. In The scientific nature of geomorphology, ed. C.E. Thorn and B.L. Rhoads, 87–114. New York City: Wiley.
Simon, G.L. 2016. Flame and fortune in the American West: Urban development, environmental change, and the great Oakland hills fire. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Stengers, I. 2013. Une autre science est possible. Paris: La Découverte.
Thornes, J.E. 1981. A paradigmatic shift in atmospheric studies? Progress in Physical Geography 5 (3): 429–440.
Thrift, N. 2002. The future of geography. Geoforum 33 (3): 291–298.
Turner, M. 2015. Political ecology II: Engagements with ecology. Progress in Human Geography 40 (3): 413–421.
Van Dyke, C. 2015. Boxing daze–using state-and-transition models to explore the evolution of socio-biophysical landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography 39 (5): 594–621.
Walker, P. 2005. Political ecology: Where is the ecology? Progress in Human Geography 29 (1): 73–82.
Watts, M.J. 1985. Social theory and environmental degradation: The case of Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. In Desert development: Man and technology in sparselands, ed. Y. Gradus, 14–32. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Wear, D.N. 1999. Challenges to interdisciplinary discourse. Ecosystems 2: 299–301.
Wilcock, Deirdre, G.J. Brierley, and Richard Howitt. 2013. Ethnogeomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography 37 (5): 573–600.
Zimmerer, K.S., H. Córdova-Aguilar, R. Mata Olmo, Y. Jiménez Olivencia, and S.J. Vanek. 2017. Mountain ecology, remoteness, and the rise of agrobiodiversity: Tracing the geographic spaces of human–environment knowledge. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (2): 441–455.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lave, R., Biermann, C., Lane, S.N. (2018). Introducing Critical Physical Geography. In: Lave, R., Biermann, C., Lane, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71460-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71461-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)