Abstract
In Frege’s analysis of the relationship between science and fiction there are two important aspects, which the paper will discuss. It shows that Frege makes a strict distinction between Dichtung und Wissenschaft on the level of object language but not on the level of metalanguage. (1) In his “On Sense and Reference” and in scattered remarks elsewhere Frege explains the semantics (and pragmatics) of scientific and everyday discourse. As a kind of side product he presents an explication of the concept of fictional discourse concerning questions of illocutionary force and reference. Here Frege anticipates J. R. Searle’s speech-act-theory of fictional discourse, which allows to understand works of fiction as consisting (at least partly) of fictional discourse. On the basis of Frege’s distinctions this approach is defended against ontological arguments, which make use of terms like ‘fictive entities’ or ‘non-existent objects’ in the Meinongian tradition. (2) Frege excludes the connotative or figurative elements of language, called “colourings and shadings” (Färbungen und Beleuchtungen) of sense or thought, from the scientific use of language and assigns such elements to “the art of poetry” or “eloquence”. The fact that the expression ‘colouring’ is itself a figurative term, raises a paradoxical question: To what extent does understanding Frege’s own explanation of the difference between sense and colouring depend on the poetic or at least rhetoric use of language? There are reasons to believe that Frege was—even if only reluctantly—aware of this paradox. Otherwise he would not have repeatedly emphasized that explanations of categorial logical distinctions (particularly such as those between ‘function’ and ‘object’) cannot dispense with “figurative expressions” (like ‘unsaturated’ and ‘saturated’). Insofar as such distinctions are “reliant upon the accommodating understanding of the reader”, they pay tribute to a rhetoric of cognition. While Frege denies that colourings contribute to cognitive content, he must still admit that they make an indispensable protreptic contribution to conveying cognition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The page numbers of Frege’s works refer to the first German editions (cf. the bibliography). The English translation given here follows for the greater part the edition of Beaney (Frege 1997), which includes the original pagination.
- 2.
- 3.
For a justification of the recognition of non-propositional cognition from the perspective of perception theory, cf. Schildknecht (2002, 199–215).
- 4.
For the role of imagination in the reception of fictional literature cf. Sutrop (2000).
References
Beardsley, M. C. (1958). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Ernesti, J. C. T. (1962a). Lexicon technologiae graecorum rhetoricae (1795). Hildesheim: Olms.
Ernesti, J. C. T. (1962b). Lexicon technologiae latinorum rhetoricae (1797). Hildesheim: Olms.
Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: L. Nebert.
Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: W. Koebner.
Frege, G. (1892a). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50.
Frege, G. (1892b). Ueber Begriff und Gegenstand. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 16, 192–205.
Frege, G. (1904). Was ist eine Funktion? In S. Meyer (Ed.), Festschrift Ludwig Boltzmann gewidmet zum sechzigsten Geburtstage, 20. Februar 1904 (pp. 656–666). Leipzig: J. A. Barth.
Frege, G. (1918). Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus, I(2), 58–77.
Frege, G. (1983). Nachgelassene Schriften (2nd ed.). H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, & F. Kaulbach, (Eds.). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Frege, G. (1997). The Frege reader. M. Beaney (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gabriel, G. (1975). Fiktion und Wahrheit: Eine semantische Theorie der Literatur. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Gabriel, G. (1979). Fiction—A semantic approach. Poetics, 8, 245–255.
Gabriel, G. (1991). Zwischen Logik und Literatur: Erkenntnisformen von Dichtung, Philosophie und Wissenschaft. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Gabriel, G. (1993). Fictional objects? A ‘Fregean’ response to Terence Parsons. Modern Logic, 3, 367–375.
Gumbrecht, H. U. (2004). Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kant, I. (1968). Kritik der Urteilskraft. In Kants Werke: Akademie-Textausgabe (Vol. 5). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Keller, G. (1956). Sämtliche Werke und ausgewählte Briefe (Vol. 1). C. Heselhaus (Ed.). München: Hanser.
Lukács, G. (1967). Über die Besonderheit als Kategorie des Ästhetischen. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
Musil, R. (1978). Briefe 1901–1942 (Vol. 2). A. Frisé (Ed.). Reinbek: Rowohlt Verlag.
Parsons, T. (1980). Nonexistent objects. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Parsons, T. (1982). Fregean theories of fictional objects. Topoi, 1(1-2), 81–87.
Quintilianus, M. F. (1995). Institutio Oratoria: Ausbildung des Redners. Zwölf Bücher. (3rd ed., H. Rahn, Trans., 2 vols). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Scaliger, J. C. (1987). Poetices libri septem (1561). Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
Schildknecht, C. (2002). Sense and self: Perspectives on nonpropositionality. Paderborn: mentis.
Searle, J. R. (1975). The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6, 319–332.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidney, P. (1971). A defence of poetry (1595) (2nd ed.). J. A. van Dorsten (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sutrop, M. (2000). Fiction and imagination: The anthropological function of literature. Paderborn: mentis.
Tolstoy, L. (1978). Letter to N. N. Strachov from the 23rd and 26th April 1876. In F. Christian (Ed.), L. Tolstoy, Tolstoy’s letters (pp. 296–297). London: Athlone Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Vermischte Bemerkungen/Culture and value (2nd ed.). G. H. von Wright (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wolff, C. H. (1996). Discursus praeliminaris de philosophia in genere. Latin-German text. G. Gawlick, & L. Kreimendahl (Eds.). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gabriel, G. (2018). Science and Fiction: A Fregean Approach. In: Bengtsson, G., Säätelä, S., Pichler, A. (eds) New Essays on Frege. Nordic Wittgenstein Studies, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71186-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71186-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71185-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71186-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)