Skip to main content

A Method to Support the Selection of Technologies for the Virtualization of Consulting Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation of the Consulting Industry

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

Digital transformation in consulting and the virtualization of consulting services are based on the use of information- and communication technologies, such as data mining software, collaboration tools or smartphone apps. There is a pool of possible technologies and tools from which the most appropriate combination can be selected for the consulting process or individual task to be virtualized. So far, though, there is a lack of suitable methods and tools to perform this selection. In this chapter, we propose using a combination of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and core ideas from Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to address this issue successfully. This suggested method is based on an extensive literature review, and the analysis of existing virtualization initiatives. It aims to support consulting companies in determining appropriate technologies and tools for the virtualization of consulting services. An example illustrates its application in a practical consulting context. The devised method is part of the virtualization process model, described in detail in a different chapter of this volume. The method belongs to the design-oriented parts of the process model and builds on the virtualization potential of individual consulting services, as determined in the initial analysis phase of the process model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A stimulus describes a certain combination of the individual criteria expressions of a possible technology (Green and Srinivasan 1990).

References

  • Akao Y (1990) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang M, Yang YS, Lin CT (2009) Production technology selection: deploying market requirements, competitive and operational strategies, and manufacturing attributes. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 22(4):345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran M (2009) Introduction of a technology selection model. In: HICCS 2009—42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Waikoloa, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsten H, Gössinger R, Müller-Seitz G, Schneider G (eds) (2016) Grundlagen des technologie- und innovations managements, 2nd edn. Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1986) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring N, Bortz J (2015) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. J Bus Ventur 5:177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AG, Souza DVSd, Ribeiro JLD, Echeveste ME (2013) A framework for decision-making in investment alternatives selection. Int J Prod Res 51(19):5866–5883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green PE, Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing. New developments with implications for research and practice. J Mark 54(4):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenberg S (2004) Methodenentwicklung in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung. Kovač, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess T, Brecht L (1996) State of the art des business process redesign: Darstellung und Vergleich bestehender Methoden, 2nd edn. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Houseman O, Tiwari A, Roy R (2004) A methodology for the selection of new technologies in the aviation industry. Cranfield University, Bedfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Jang DH, Lee DH, Cho SH (2000) A methodology of constructing a decision path for IT investment. J Strateg Inf Syst 9(1):17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krcmar H (2015) Informationsmanagement. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Najda L (2001) Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie in der Unternehmensberatung: Möglichkeiten, Wirkungen und Gestaltung des Einsatzes. Dissertation, University of Hohenheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen V, Seifert H (2016a) Digitale Transformation in der Unternehmensberatung: Status Quo in Deutschland. In: Deelmann T, Ockel DM (eds) Handbuch der Unternehmensberatung. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, pp 7312–7319

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen V, Seifert H (2016b) Virtualisierung in der Unternehmensberatung. Eine Studie im deutschen Beratungsmarkt, BDU, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen V, Seifert H (2017) Ermittlung des Virtualisierungspotenzials von Beratungsleistungen im Consulting. In: Leimeister JM, Brenner W (eds) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, WI2017, St. Gallen, pp 1348–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen V, Seifert H, Ackert MN (2017) A process model for the virtualization of consulting services. In this volume

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen V, Seifert H, Blumenstein M (2015) Virtualisierung von Beratungsleistungen: Qualitätsanforderungen, Chancen und Risiken der digitalen Transformation in der Unternehmensberatung aus der Klientenperspektive. In: Deelmann T, Ockel DM (eds) Handbuch der Unternehmensberatung, 25th edn. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Offermann P, Blom S, Levina O, Bub U (2010) Proposal for components of method design theories. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(5):295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overby E (2008) Process virtualization theory and the impact of information technology. Organ Sci 19(2):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manage Inf Syst 24(3):45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters ML, Zelewski S (2002) Analytical hierarchy process (AHP): Dargestellt am Beispiel der Auswahl von Projektmanagement-Software zum Multiprojektmanagement. Technical Report 2002–14, Universität Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Technical Report 2000–6, University of Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2012) Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster K (2005) E-Consulting; Chancen und Risiken. Dissertation, University of Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert H, Nissen V (2016) Virtualisierung von Beratungsleistungen: Stand der Forschung zur digitalen Transformation in der Unternehmensberatung und weiterer Forschungsbedarf. In: Nissen V, Stelzer D, Straßburger S, Fischer D (eds) Proceedings of MKWI2016. Ilmedia, Ilmenau, pp 1031–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenberg C, vom Brocke J (2012) Evaluation patterns for design science research artefacts. In: Helfert M, Donnellan B (eds) Practical aspects of design science. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Starzyńska B, Hamrol A (2013) Excellence toolbox: decision support system for quality tools and techniques selection and application. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence 24(5–6):577–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hillegersberg J, Kumar K (1999) Using metamodeling to integrate object-oriented analysis, design and programming concepts. Inf Syst 24(2):113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vöhringer B (2004) Computerunterstützte Führung in Kommunalverwaltung und -politik: Steuerung mit New Public Management und Informationstechnologie. DUV, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke J, Simons A, Niehaves B, Riemer K, Plattfaut R, Cleven A (2009) Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: ECIS 2009 proceedings of European conference on information systems, Verona, pp 2206–2217

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Watson R (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q 26(2):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Werth D, Greff T (2017) Scalability in consulting: insights into the scaling capabilities of business models by digital technologies in consulting industry. In this volume

    Google Scholar 

  • Werth D, Greff T, Scheer AW (2016) Consulting 4.0—Die Digitalisierung der Unternehmensberatung. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 53(1):55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu P, Lee HJ (2013) Optimal technology selection considering input levels of resource. Ind Manage Data Syst 113(1):57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Nissen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nissen, V., Seifert, H., Blumenstein, M. (2018). A Method to Support the Selection of Technologies for the Virtualization of Consulting Services. In: Nissen, V. (eds) Digital Transformation of the Consulting Industry. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70491-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics