Abstract
Software startups often make assumptions about the problems and customers they are addressing as well as the market and the solutions they are developing. Testing the right assumptions early is a means to mitigate risks. Approaches such as Lean Startup foster this kind of testing by applying experimentation as part of a constant build-measure-learn feedback loop. The existing research on how software startups approach experimentation is very limited. In this study, we focus on understanding how software startups approach experimentation and identify challenges and advantages with respect to conducting experiments. To achieve this, we conducted a qualitative interview study. The initial results show that startups often spent a disproportionate amount of time focusing on creating solutions without testing critical assumptions. Main reasons are the lack of awareness, that these assumptions can be tested early and a lack of knowledge and support on how to identify, prioritize and test these assumptions. However, startups understand the need for testing risky assumptions and are open to conducting experiments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bosch, J.: Building products as innovation experiment systems. In: Cusumano, Michael A., Iyer, B., Venkatraman, N. (eds.) ICSOB 2012. LNBIP, vol. 114, pp. 27–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_3
Fagerholm, F., Sanchez Guinea, A., Mäenpää, H., Münch, J.: The RIGHT model for continuous experimentation. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 292–305 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.034
Hassi, L., Tuulenmäki, A. (eds.): Experimentation-driven approach to innovation: developing novel offerings through experiments. In: ISPIM Conference, Manchester (2012)
Bosch, J., Holmström Olsson, H., Björk, J., Ljungblad, J.: The early stage software startup development model: a framework for operationalizing lean principles in software startups. In: Fitzgerald, B., Conboy, K., Power, K., Valerdi, R., Morgan, L., Stol, K.-J. (eds.) LESS 2013. LNBIP, vol. 167, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-44930-7_1
Lindgren, E., Münch, J.: Raising the odds of success. the current state of experimentation in product development. Info. Softw. Technol. 77, 80–91 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2016.04.008
Nguyen-Duc, A., Abrahamsson, P. (eds.): Minimum Viable Product or Multiple Facet Product? The Role of MVP in Software Startups. In: XP2016 (2016)
Nguyen-Duc, A., Wang, X., Abrahamsson, P. (eds.): What influences the speed of prototyping? An empirical investigation of twenty software startups. In: XP2017 (2017)
Ries, E.: The Lean Startup. How Constant Innovation Creates Radically Successful Businesses/ Eric Ries. The Lean Series. Portfolio Penguin, London (2011)
Victoria Barret (2011). https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoriabarret/2011/10/18/dropbox-the-inside-story-of-techs-hottest-startup
Yin, R.K.: Case study research. Design and methods. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014). Robert K. Yin
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank all participants for their time and contributions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gutbrod, M., Münch, J., Tichy, M. (2017). How Do Software Startups Approach Experimentation? Empirical Results from a Qualitative Interview Study. In: Felderer, M., Méndez Fernández, D., Turhan, B., Kalinowski, M., Sarro, F., Winkler, D. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10611. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69925-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69926-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)