Skip to main content

Pragmatic Approaches to World Heritage Management: Along the Central Asian Silk Roads

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites

Abstract

Robust management systems for World Heritage are essential for the protection and preservation of the outstanding universal value of the sites. A well-managed planning process is an opportunity for the concerned authorities and stakeholders to share values, establish collaboration, and build capacity. However, in practice, these systems often lack of proper baseline information, coordination of activities with the wider urban setting, and a regulated planning framework. Thus, there is a need to validate appropriate procedures in heritage documentation, and to establish comprehensive management frameworks. This chapter focuses on the management practices and strategies, as well as on past and existing challenges and opportunities, along the Silk Roads in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kazakhstan as acceptance (Ac) on the 29/04/1994 and Uzbekistan as notification of succession (S) on the 13/01/1993. Available online: http://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/ (Accessed 2016–09-07).

  2. 2.

    An archaeological park is the link between scientific research and the public. It can be termed as a definable area, distinguished by the value of heritage resources and land related to such resources, having the potential to become an interpretive, educational and recreational resource for the public, which should be protected and conserved (Salalah Declaration 2015).

References

  • Baipakov, K. M., et al. (2013). Treasure of ancient and medieval Taraz and Zhambyl region. Archaeological Expertise LLP: Almaty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baipakov, K. M., Savelieva, T. V., & Chang, C. (2002). Medieval cities and settlements of the North-Eastern Zhetysu (Байпаков К.М., Савельева Т.В., Чанг К. Средневековые города и поселения Северо-Восточного Жетысу). Almaty: Print-S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. (2010). Informed conservation: the place of research and documentation in preservation. APT Bulletin, 41(4), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demas, M. (2002). Planning for conservation and management of archaeological sites: A values-based approach. In J. M. Teutonico & G. Palumbo (Eds.), Management planning for archaeological site (pp. 27–56). Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute. (an international workshop organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and Loyola Marymount University 19-22 May 2000 Corinth, Greece).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodde, E. (2010). Conservation and conflict in the Central Asian Silk Roads. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 16(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS. (1995). Nara document on authenticity. Paris: International Committee on Monuments and Sites. Retrieved November 2, 2010, from http://www.international.icomos.org/naradoc_eng.htm.

  • Paskaleva, E. G. (2013). Samarqand refashioned: A traveler’s impressions (with a preface by Daniel C. Waugh). Silk Road Journal, 11, 139–153. Retrieved September 10, 2016, from http://www.silkroadfoundation.org/newsletter/vol11/srjournal_v11.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, M., & Sullivan, S. (1995). Assessing the value of Heritage places. In M. Pearson & S. Sullivan (Eds.), Looking after Heritage places. The basics of Heritage planning for managers, landowners and administrators (pp. 126–186). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peshkov, Y. (2007). Current situation of heritage in central Asia—observations and prioritizations through the activities of the UNESCO Office. Unpublished report on Expert Meeting on Cultural Heritage in Asia and the Pacific Strategy Development and Needs Assessment. Tokio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salalah Declaration. (2015). Salalah Recommendation of the First International Conference of ICOMOS on Archaeological Parks and Sites. Retrieced December 1, 2016, from http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/1256.

  • Savelieva, T. V. (1994). Settled culture of the North Ridges of Zaili Alatau in 8-13 cc AD (Савельева Т.В. Оседлая культура северных склонов Заилийского Алатау в VIII-XIII вв.). Almaty: Gylym (Гылым).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senigova, T. N. (1972). Medieval Taraz (Средневековый Тараз). Almaty: Nauka (Наука).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turekulova, N. (2013). Problems of heritage preservation in historical cities of Kazakhstan. In K. Weise (Ed.), Revisiting Kathmandu: Safeguarding Living Urban Heritage (pp. 83–88). Kathmandu: Kathmandu UNESCO Office. (International symposium Kathmandu Valley 25–29 November 2013). Retrieved September 22, 2016, from unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002317/231755E.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2016). Item 7B of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List. Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B. Add, Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved December 4, 2016, from http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2016/whc16-40com-7BAdd-en.pdf.

  • UNESCO. (2013). Managing cultural World Heritage (World Heritage Resource Manual). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2016). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Document WHC.16/01. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved January 7, 2017, from http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines.

  • UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved April 16, 2016, from http://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vileikis, O., & Allayarov, S. (2015). Enhancement of the implementation of the World Heritage convention through strengthening the protection and management mechanism in the historic centre of Bukhara. In K. Weise (ed.) Revisiting Kathmandu: Safeguarding Living Urban Heritage (International symposium Kathmandu valley, 25–29 November 2013) (pp. 133–140). Kathmandu: Kathmandu UNESCO Office. Retrieved September 22, 2016, from unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002317/231755E.pdf.

  • Vileikis, O. (2015). Achieving dialogue through transnational World Heritage Nomination: The case of the silk roads. In W. Logan, M. N. Craith, & U. Kockel (Eds.), A companion to Heritage studies (pp. 507–521). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Voyakin, D. (2013). Archaeological park as a basis for elaborating principles and objectives of Venice Charter. World Heritage. Paris: UNESCO (69), 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ona Vileikis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vileikis, O., Voyakin, D., Utegenova, A., Allayarov, S. (2018). Pragmatic Approaches to World Heritage Management: Along the Central Asian Silk Roads. In: Makuvaza, S. (eds) Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69856-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69856-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69855-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69856-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics