Skip to main content

Energy Management in the Maritime Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility in the Maritime Industry

Part of the book series: WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs ((WMUSTUD,volume 5))

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and energy management are highly interrelated with each other. Energy management serves and contributes to the targets set by a CSR policy of a shipping company or a port authority. Managers of some of these organizations have responsibilities for the effective implementation of energy efficient measures both in ship operations and in port activities under the fulfilment of their CSR (Kitada and Ölçer 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Planetary Boundaries is the central concept in an Earth system framework proposed in 2009 by a group of environmental scientists led by Johan Rockström from the Stockholm Resilience Centre and Will Steffan from the Australian National University. The concept seeks to define a so-called safe operating space for humanity in relation to the consumption of Earth’s resources as a precondition for sustainable stewardship.

References

  • Acciaro, M. (2015). Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 18(3), 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acciaro, M., Hoffmann, P. N., & Eide, M. S. (2013). The energy efficiency gap in maritime transport. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, 3(10), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilitewski, B. (2012). The circular economy and its risks. Waste Management, 32, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boile, M., Theofanis, S., Sdoukopoulo, E., & Plytas, N. (2015). Developing a port energy management plan: Issues, challenges and prospects. Transportation Research on Board of the National Academic. (GREENBERTH project).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company. (2014). Port of Los Angeles: Energy 44 Management Action Plan. Draft Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerceau, J., Mat, N., Junqua, G., Lin, L., Laforest, V., & Gonzalez, C. (2014). Implementing industrial ecology in port cities: International overview of case studies and cross-case analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLARKSON. (2016). https://www.clarksons.net, Seaborne Trade Monitor, 3(1), January 2016, ISSN: 2058-7570.

  • Commodity Special Feature from World Economic Outlook, International Monetary Fund. (April 2016). https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/01/pdf/SF_Commod.pdf.

  • COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL, Energy Efficiency and its contribution to energy security and the 2030 Framework for climate and energy policy, COM(2014) 520 final, Brussels, 23.7.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denktas-Sakar, G., & Karatas-Cetin, C. (2012). Port sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: A framework on resource dependence theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3), 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, S., & Turner, W. C. (2013). Energy management handbook (8th ed.). Liburn, GA: The Fairmont Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, A., Gardner, G., & Williams, T. (2011). Global commodity markets – price volatility and financialisation. Bulletin June Quarter 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy, Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2014). Towards the circular economy, Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPO/EcoPorts Port Environmental Review. (2016). Insight on port environmental performance and its evolution over time April 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y. Y., Chen, L. X., & Zhang, S. Q. (2013). System dynamics modeling for urban energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A case study of Beijing, China. Ecological Modelling, 252, 44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, L. G. (2013). Toward a Smart Sustainable Development of Port Cities/Areas: The Role of the “Historic Urban Landscape” Approach, sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Marine Trends 2030 Report, Commercial Sector, pp. 52–53. http://www.lr.org/en/marine/projects/global-marine-trends-2030.aspx.

  • Hippinen, I., & Federley, J. (2014). Fact-finding study on opportunities to enhance the energy efficiency and environmental impacts of ports in the Baltic Sea Region. Motiva Services Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, B. S. (1989). The port-city interface: Trends, problems and examples. Geoforum, 20, 429–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2015). Energy and climate change, World Energy Outlook Special Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2009). Second IMO Greenhouse Gas Study. London: IMO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2014). Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study. London: IMO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H., Johansson, M., & Andersson, K. (2014). Barriers to improving energy efficiency in short sea shipping: an action research case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66(1), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junqua, G., & Moine, H. (2007). Utilisation de l’écologie industrielle et de l’intelligence économique territoriale pour le développement durable d’une Zone Industrialo-Portuaire. Déchets Sciences et Techniques, (46), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junqua, G., Moine, H., & Bouzidi, Y. (2006). Développement durable d’une zone industrialo-portuaire: utilisation de l’écologie industrielle et de l’intelligence économique et territoriale. Paris: Colloque Européen EMUE, May 18–19, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junqua, G., Moine, H., Bouzidi, Y., Abriak, N. E., & Damidot, D. (2005). L’écologie industrielle, outil de l’intelligence économique et territoriale. In: Conférence Internationale d’Ingénierie Urbaine e technologies innovantes pour les infrastructures et l’habitat (pp. 385–393). Lille, October, 12–13, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitada, M., & Ölçer, A. (2015). Managing people and technology: The challenges in CSR and energy efficient shipping. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 17, 36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molland, A. F., Turnock, S. R., & Hudson, D. A. (2011). Ship resistance and propulsion: Practical estimation of propulsive power., Cambridge University Press, 8 Aug 2011, ISBN: 9781107641259‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬.‬

    Google Scholar 

  • Motiva, 2011. Motiva Oy, Energiakatselmustoiminta, 2011. http://www.motiva.fi/toimialueet/energiakatselmustoiminta.

  • Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2015). The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordas, H., & Piermartini, R. (2004). Infrastructure and Trade, World Trade Organisation Staff Working Paper ERSD-2004-04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ölçer, A., & Ballini, F. (2015). The development of a decision making framework for evaluating the trade-off solutions of cleaner seaborne transportation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 37, 150–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathways to a Circular Economy, Rabobank Industry Note #343 - October 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Stuart Chapin, F., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R., Hoffmann, J., Micco, A., Pizzolitto, G., Sgut, M., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2003). Port efficiency and international trade: Port efficiency as a determinant of maritime transport costs. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5, 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, J. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symbiotic bio-Energy Port Integration with Cities by 2020 (EPIC 2020) https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/en/projects/epic-2020

  • The Economist Intelligence Unit Hot Spots. Benchmarking Global City Competitiveness. A Report from the Economist Intelligence Unit. http://www.citigroup.com/citi/citiforcities/pdfs/eiu_hotspots_2012.pdf

  • Thorpe, D. (2014). Energy management in industry. New York: Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-415-70647-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trends in EU ports governance 2016, European Sea Ports Organisation (ESPO) http://www.espo.be/media/espopublications/Trends_in_EU_ports_gouvernance_2016_FINAL_VERSION.pdf.

  • Vallega, A. (2001). Urban waterfront facing integrated coastal management. Ocean Coastal. Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassalos, D. (2009). Chapter 2-Risk based ship design. In: A. Papanikolaou (Ed.), Risk-based ship design; methods, tools and applications (p. 25). ISBN 978-3-540-89041-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmans, B. W., & Louw, E. (2011). Changing port–city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 575–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, W. Y., & Lam, J. S. L. (2013). 80 Million-TEU container port? Sustainability issues in port and coastal development. Ocean & Coastal Management, 71, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Z., Bi, J., & Moriguichi, Y. (2006). The circular economy: a new development strategy in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10, 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aykut I. Ölçer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ölçer, A.I., Ballini, F. (2018). Energy Management in the Maritime Industry. In: Froholdt, L. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in the Maritime Industry. WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69143-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69143-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69142-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69143-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics