Skip to main content

Contextualized Positive Youth Development: A SWOT Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Well-Being of Youth and Emerging Adults across Cultures

Part of the book series: Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology ((CAPP,volume 12))

Abstract

An attempt is made to integrate the previous chapters of the book on Positive Youth Development (PYD). The integration takes the form of a SWOT analysis. It is argued that the main strengths of PYD literature are its study of positive aspects of youth development (in contrast to the more common deficiency-based approaches) and its attention for contextual factors, cross-cultural issues such as the delineation of universal and culture-specific aspects of PYD. The main weakness is the scarcity of models that link individuals and their environment; contextual analyses are usually ad hoc and not based on a model of the environment, such as developmentally relevant classifications of countries. The main opportunities are the extension of current models of PYD in a cross-cultural context, as amply illustrated in various chapters of this volume. The main weaknesses of the extant literature on PYD are its Western dominance and exclusive focus on positive aspects, thereby possibly neglecting negative consequences of adverse conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Italicized author names refer to a chapter in this volume.

  2. 2.

    Italicized author names in the text refer to chapters in the present volume and are not listed here. The reader is referred to the Table of Contents for details of the chapters.

References

Italicized author names in the text refer to chapters in the present volume and are not listed here. The reader is referred to the Table of Contents for details of the chapters.

  • Arikan, S., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA mathematics and reading performance differences of mainstream European and Turkish immigrant students. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29, 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2017). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. London, UK: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (Eds.). (2006). Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in contemporary democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., & Fan, W. (2013). From Chinese to cross-cultural personality inventory: A combined emic–etic approach to the study of personality in culture. In M. Gelfand, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (Vol. III, pp. 117–179). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fetvadjiev, V. H., Meiring, D., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Nel, J. A., & Hill, C. (2015). The South African Personality Inventory (SAPI): A culture-informed instrument for the country’s main ethnocultural groups. Psychological Assessment, 27, 827–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Georgas, J., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Berry, J. W. (2004). The ecocultural framework, ecosocial indices and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbling, M. (2013). Validating integration and citizenship policy indices. Comparative European Politics, 11, 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddlestone, T., & Niessen, J. (2011). Migrant integration policy Index III. Brussels, Belgium: British Council and Migration Policy Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagitçibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, C., Karasawa, M., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Minimalist in style: Self, identity, and well-being in Japan. Self and Identity, 8, 300–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katigbak, M. S., Church, A. T., Guanzon-Lapeña, M. A., Carlota, A. J., & Del Pilar, G. H. (2002). Are indigenous dimensions culture-specific? Philippine inventories and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 89–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keel, P. K., & Klump, K. L. (2003). Are eating disorders culture-bound syndromes? Implications for conceptualizing their etiology. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 747–769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Allik, J. (Eds.). (2002). The five-factor model across cultures. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. (2015). Is “culture” a workable concept for (cross-)cultural psychology? Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1320–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Eds.). (2000). Positive psychology [Special issue] American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: theory and emprical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2006). Culture and psychology: A SWOT analysis of cross-cultural psychology. In Q. Jing, H. Zhang, & K. Zhang (Eds.), Psychological science around the world (Vol. 2, pp. 279–298). London, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Contributions of internationalization to psychology: Toward a global and inclusive discipline. American Psychologist, 68, 761–770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westermeyer, J., & Janca, A. (1997). Language, culture and psychopathology: Conceptual and methodological issues. Transcultural Psychiatry, 34, 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fons J. R. van de Vijver .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2017). Contextualized Positive Youth Development: A SWOT Analysis. In: Dimitrova, R. (eds) Well-Being of Youth and Emerging Adults across Cultures . Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68363-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics