Abstract
Ecological networks describe species interactions in ecological processes. There is a growing number of methods for describing and analysing the interaction patterns between species in these networks. The most commonly used network-level indices, such as connectance, degree distribution, nestedness, and modularity, describe the diversity and organization of species interactions within the entire network. These indices can provide insight into the rules underlying the organization of ecological processes, but also about the robustness of ecological networks to changes and perturbations. Species-level indices, such as centrality, dependence, species strength, module roles, and different indices for species specialization, describe the roles of species in the network and the importance of species, both for their direct interaction partners and for the cohesion of the entire network. These indices can be used to identify species with important roles which is useful for the conservation of ecological processes. Both network-level and species-level indices are influenced by various factors, such as species’ local abundances, traits, and phylogenetic relationships, as well as environmental conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aizen MA, Sabatino M, Tylianakis JM (2012) Specialization and rarity predict nonrandom loss of interactions from mutualist networks. Science 335:1486–1489
Albert R, Barabasi AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–97
Barber MJ (2007) Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks. Phys Rev E 76:066102
Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Pastor-Satorras R et al (2004) The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:3747–3752
Bartomeus I (2013) Understanding linkage rules in plant-pollinator networks by using hierarchical models that incorporate pollinator detectability and plant traits. PLoS One 8:e69200
Bartomeus I, Gravel D, Tylianakis JM et al (2016) A common framework for identifying linkage rules across different types of interactions. Funct Ecol 30:1894–1903
Bascompte J, Jordano P (2014) Mutualistic networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford
Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ et al (2003) The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:9383–9387
Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen JM (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312:431–433
Bastolla U, Fortuna MA, Pascual-García A et al (2009) The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 458:1018–1020
Bender IMA, Kissling WD, Böhning-Gaese K et al (2017) Functionally specialised birds respond flexibly to seasonal changes in fruit availability. J Anim Ecol 86:800–811.
Blüthgen N, Klein A-M (2011) Functional complementarity and specialisation: the role of biodiversity in plant-pollinator interactions. Basic Appl Ecol 12:282–291
Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Blüthgen N (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol 6:9
Bosch J, Martín González AM, Rodrigo A et al (2009) Plant–pollinator networks: adding the pollinator’s perspective. Ecol Lett 12:409–419
Cattin MF, Bersier LF, Banašek-Richter C et al (2004) Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure. Nature 427:835–839
Corbet SA (2000) Conserving compartments in pollination webs. Conserv Biol 14:1229–1231
Dalsgaard B, Trøjelsgaard K, Martín-González AM et al (2013) Historical climate-change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks. Ecography 36(12):1331–1340
Dalsgaard B, Schleuning M, Maruyama PK et al (2017) Opposed latitudinal patterns of network-derived and dietary specialization in avian plant–frugivore interaction systems. Ecography (in press). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02604
Dehling DM, Töpfer T, Schaefer HM et al (2014) Functional relationships beyond species richness patterns: trait matching in plant–bird mutualisms across scales. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1085–1093
Dehling DM, Jordano P, Schaefer HM et al (2016) Morphology predicts species’ functional roles and their degree of specialization in plant–frugivore interactions. Proc R Soc B 283:20152444
Donatti CI, Guimarães PR Jr, Galetti M et al (2011) Analysis of a hyper-diverse seed dispersal network: modularity and underlying mechanisms. Ecol Lett 14:773–781
Dormann CF, Strauß R (2014) A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks. Methods Ecol Evol 5:90–98
Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2002) Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecol Lett 5:558–567
Dupont YL, Olesen JM (2009) Ecological modules and roles of species in heathland plant–insect flower visitor networks. J Anim Ecol 78:346–353
Eklöf A, Jacob U, Kopp J et al (2013) The dimensionality of ecological networks. Ecol Lett 16:577–583
Elton C (1927) Animal ecology. Sidgwick and Jackson, London
Falcão JCF, Dáttilo W, Rico-Gray V (2016) Sampling effort differences can lead to biased conclusions on the architecture of ant-plant interaction networks. Ecol Complex 25:44–52
Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40:35–41
Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1:215–239
Guimerà R, Amaral LAN (2005a) Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles. J Stat Mech 2005:P02001
Guimerà R, Amaral LAN (2005b) Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433:895–900
Guimerà R, Sales-Pardo M, Amaral LAN (2007) Module identification in bipartite and directed networks. Phys Rev E 76:036102
Howe HF (1993) Specialized and generalized dispersal systems: where does ‘the paradigm’ stand? Vegetatio 107:3–13
Joppa LN, Bascompte J, Montoya JM et al (2009) Reciprocal specialization in ecological networks. Ecol Lett 12:961–969
Jordán F, Liu WC, Davis AJ (2006) Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs. Oikos 112:535–546
Jordán F, Benedek Z, Podani J (2007) Quantifying positional importance in food webs: a comparison of centrality indices. Ecol Model 205:270–275
Jordano P (1987) Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. Am Nat 129:657–677
Jordano P (2016) Sampling networks of ecological interactions. Funct Ecol 30:1883–1893
Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JM (2003) Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant–animal interactions. Ecol Lett 6:69–81
Junker RR, Blüthgen N, Brehm T et al (2013) Specialization on traits as basis for the niche-breadth of flower visitors and as structuring mechanism of ecological networks. Funct Ecol 27:329–341
Krasnov BR, Fortuna MA, Mouillot D et al (2012) Phylogenetic signal in module composition and species connectivity in compartmentalized host-parasite networks. Am Nat 179:501–511
Krishna A, Guimarães PR Jr, Jordano P et al (2008) A neutral-niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks. Oikos 117:1609–1618
Maglianesi MA, Blüthgen N, Böhning-Gaese K et al (2014) Morphological traits determine specialization and resource use in plant–hummingbird networks in the neotropics. Ecology 95:3325–3334
Mello MAR, Marquitti FMD, Guimarães PR Jr et al (2011) The missing part of seed dispersal networks: structure and robustness of bat-fruit interactions. PLoS One 6:e17395
Mello MAR, Rodrigues FA, Costa LDF et al (2015) Keystone species in seed dispersal networks are mainly determined by dietary specialization. Oikos 124:1031–1039
Montoya D, Yallop ML, Memmot J (2015) Functional group diversity increases with modularity in complex food webs. Nat Commun 6:7379
Morales-Castilla I, Matias MG, Gravel D et al (2015) Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. Trends Ecol Evol 30:347–356
Nogales M, Heleno R, Rumeu B et al (2015) Seed-dispersal networks on the Canaries and the Galápagos archipelagos: interaction modules as biogeographical entities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:912–922
Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL et al (2007) The modularity of pollination networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:19891–19896
Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL et al (2010) Missing and forbidden links in mutualistic networks. Proc R Soc B 278:725–732
Patterson BD, Atmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biol J Linn Soc 28:65–82
Pellmyr O (2002) Pollination by animals. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 157–184
Peralta G, Frost CM, Didham RK et al (2015) Phylogenetic diversity and co-evolutionary signals among trophic levels change across a habitat edge. J Anim Ecol 84:364–372
Petchey OL, Beckerman AP, Riede JO et al (2008) Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4191–4196
Poulin R, Krasnov BR, Pilosof S et al (2013) Phylogeny determines the role of helminth parasites in intertidal food webs. J Anim Ecol 82:1265–1275
Rezende EL, Lavabre JE, Guimarães PR Jr et al (2007) Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature 448:925–928
Schleuning M, Ingmann L, Strauß R et al (2014) Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks. Ecol Lett 17:454–463
Solé RV, Montoya JM (2001) Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc R Soc B 268:2039–2045
Stang M, Klinkhamer PG, van ver Meijden E (2006) Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant–flower visitor web. Oikos 112:111–121
Stang M, Klinkhamer PGL, Waser NM et al (2009) Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web. Ann Bot 103:1459–1469
Stebbins GL (1970) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms I: pollination mechanisms. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1:307–326
Stouffer DB, Bascompte J (2011) Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:3648–3652
Stouffer DB, Rezende EL, Amaral LAN (2011) The role of body mass in diet contiguity and food-web structure. J Anim Ecol 80:632–639
Thébault E (2013) Identifying compartments in presence–absence matrices and bipartite networks: insights into modularity measures. J Biogeogr 40:759–768
Thébault E, Fontaine C (2010) Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329:853–856
Thompson JN (2005) The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Thompson JN (2006) Mutualistic webs of species. Science 312:372–373
Trøjelsgaard K, Olesen JM (2013) Macroecology of pollination networks. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:149–162
Vázquez DP, Aizen MA (2004) Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology 85:1251–1257
Vázquez DP, Chacoff NP, Cagnolo L (2009) Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Ecology 90:2039–2046
Vizentin-Bugoni J, Maruyama PK, Sazima M (2014) Processes entangling interactions in communities: forbidden links are more important than abundance in a hummingbird–plant network. Proc R Soc B 281:20132397
Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2000) Simple rules yield complex foodwebs. Nature 404:180–183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dehling, D.M. (2018). The Structure of Ecological Networks. In: Dáttilo, W., Rico-Gray, V. (eds) Ecological Networks in the Tropics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68228-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68228-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68227-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68228-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)