Skip to main content

Topology Optimization of Orthotropic Elastic Design Domains with Mortar Contact Conditions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO 2017)

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we perform topology optimization of orthotropic elastic design domains in unilateral contact with non-matching meshes by adopting the mortar approach. The motivation is 3D printing of assemblies of parts, where the build direction as well as the contact interfaces between the parts strongly will influence the optimal solutions. Thus, topology optimization of a standard isotropic formulation with tied interfaces might not be a proper approach for this kind of design problems. This is studied in this work by maximizing the potential energy of orthotropic linear elastic bodies in unilateral frictionless contact. In such manner, no extra adjoint equation is needed to be solved and non-zero prescribed displacements are also included in the formulation properly. This will not be true if the compliance is minimized. The contact conditions of the non-matching meshes are treated by deriving the mortar integral from the principle of virtual power by representing the normal contact pressure with the trace of the global displacement shape functions. The mortar integral is then approximated with the Lobatto rule using a high number of integration points. In such manner, we obtain a set of Signorini conditions for each non-matching interface which we solve using the augmented Lagrangian approach and Newtons method. The design domains are formulated with orthotropic linear elasticity where intermediate density values are penalized using SIMP or RAMP, and the regularization is obtained by applying sensitivity or density filters following the approaches of Sigmund and Bourdin. The implementation of the methodology is efficient and produces reliable solutions. This is demonstrated for assemblies of design domains in unilateral contact which is rotated with respect to the build direction of a 3D printer. In particular, compliance as function of build direction is generated for different problems. This kind of curves might be most useful when orienting the parts in order to minimize the volume of support structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhu, J.-H., Zhang, W.-H., Xia, L.: Topology optimization in aircraft and aerospace structures design. Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng. 23, 595–622 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Spackman, C.C., Frank, C.R., Picha, K.C., Samuel, J.: 3D printing of fiber-reinforced soft composites: process study and material characterization. J. Manufact. Process. 23, 296–305 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., Hui, D.: 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos. Part B 110, 442–458 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansson, A., Pejryd, L.: Characterisation of carbon fibre-reinforced polyamide manufactured by selective laser sintering. Add. Manufact. 9, 7–13 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou, K., Li, X.: Topology optimization of structures under multiple load cases using a fiber-reinforced composite material model. Comput. Mech. 38, 163–170 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Strömberg, N., Klarbring, A.: Topology optimization of structures in unilateral contact. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim. 41, 57–64 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Strömberg, N.: Topology optimization of structures with manufacturing and unilateral contact constraints by minimizing an adjustable compliance-volume product. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim. 42, 341–350 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Popp, A., Gitterle, M., Gee, M.W., Wall, W.A.: A dual mortar approach for 3D finite deformation contact with consistent linearization. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 83, 1428–1465 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilking, C., Bischoff, M.: Alternative integration algorithms for three-dimensional mortar contact. Comput. Mech. 59, 203–218 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Klarbring, A., Strömberg, N.: Topology optimization of hyperelastic bodies including non-zero prescribed displacements. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim. 47, 37–48 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Klarbring, A., Strömberg, N.: A note on the min-max formulation of stiffness optimization including non-zero prescribed displacements. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim. 45, 147–149 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for the financial support from Vinnova (www.vinnova.se) in the project Digi3D (www.digi3d.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niclas Strömberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Strömberg, N. (2018). Topology Optimization of Orthotropic Elastic Design Domains with Mortar Contact Conditions. In: Schumacher, A., Vietor, T., Fiebig, S., Bletzinger, KU., Maute, K. (eds) Advances in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. WCSMO 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_108

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_108

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67987-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67988-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics