Skip to main content

Competencies for Complexity: Problem Solving in the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills

Abstract

In this chapter, we present a view of problem solving as a bundle of skills, knowledge and abilities that are required to deal effectively with complex non-routine situations in different domains. This includes cognitive aspects of problem solving, such as causal reasoning, model building, rule induction, and information integration. These abilities are comparatively well covered by existing tests and relate to existing theories. However, non-cognitive components, such as motivation, self-regulation and social skills, which are clearly important for real-life problem solving have only just begun to be covered in assessment. We conclude that currently there is no single assessment instrument that captures problem solving competency in a comprehensive way and that a number of challenges must be overcome to cover a construct of this breadth effectively. Research on some important components of problem solving is still underdeveloped and will need to be expanded before we can claim a thorough, scientifically backed understanding of real-world problem solving. We suggest that a focus on handling and acting within complex systems (systems competency) may be a suitable starting point for such an integrative approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alison, L., van den Heuvel, C., Waring, S., Power, N., Long, A., O’Hara, T., & Crego, J. (2013). Immersive simulated learning environments for researching critical incidents: A knowledge synthesis of the literature and experiences of studying high-risk strategic decision making. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 7(3), 255–272. doi:10.1177/1555343412468113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, C. M., & Funke, J. (2010). Negative affective environments improve complex solving performance. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1259–1268. doi:10.1080/02699930903223766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (Eds.). (2005). The routines of decision making. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, B. (1996). Man as a stabiliser of systems: From static snapshots of judgment processes to dynamic decision making. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 225–238. doi:10.1080/135467896394528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, B. (2005). Micro-worlds and the circular relation between people and their environment. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(1), 73–93. doi:10.1080/14639220512331311580.

  • Broadbent, D. E., & Aston, B. (1978). Human control of a simulated economic system. Ergonomics, 21, 1035–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. C., D’Zurilla, T. J., & Sanna, L. J. (Eds.). (2004). Social problem solving: Theory, research, and training. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csapó, B., & Funke, J. (Eds.). (2017). The nature of problem solving. Using research to inspire 21st centurylearning. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264273955-en.

  • Danner, D., Hagemann, D., Holt, D. V., Hager, M., Schankin, A., Wüstenberg, S., & Funke, J. (2011). Measuring performance in a complex problem solving task: Reliability and validity of the tailorshop simulation. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 225–233. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1975). Wie Menschen eine Welt verbessern wollten [How people wanted to improve a world]. Bild der Wissenschaft, 12, 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1997). The logic of failure. Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D., & Reither, F. (1978). Über das Problemlösen in sehr komplexen Realitätsbereichen [On problem solving in very complex domains of reality]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 25, 527–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex problem solving: What it is and what it is not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8,1153. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153.

  • Duncker, K. (1935). Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens [On the psychology of productive thinking]. Berlin: Julius Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. (1962). Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Human Factors, 4, 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K. (2001). Affective states trigger processes of assimilation and accomodation. In L. L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 85–98). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. (2015). Assessment of problem solving skills by means of multiple complex systems – Validity of finite automata and linear dynamic systems. Dissertation, Heidelberg: Heidelberg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., & Neubert, J. C. (2015). The multiple faces of complex problems: A model of problem solving competency and its implications for training and assessment. Journal of Dynamic Decision Making, 1(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.11588/jddm.2015.1.23945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., Greiff, S., Wuestenberg, S., Fleischer, J., Buchwald, F., & Funke, J. (2015). Assessing analytic and interactive aspects of problem solving competency. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 172–179. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 436–463. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.779248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (2007). When sad is better than happy: Negative affect can improve the quality and effectiveness of persuasive messages and social influence strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 513–528. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995a). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (Eds.). (1995b). Complex problem solving: The european perspective. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: A case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 133–142. doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0345-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J. (2014a). Analysis of minimal complex systems and complex problem solving require different forms of causal cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 739. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J. (2014b). Problem solving: What are the important questions? In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 493–498). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J., Fischer, A., & Holt, D. V. (2017). When less is less: Solving multiple simple problems is not complex problem solving – A comment on Greiff et al. (2015). Journal of Intelligence, 5(1), 5. doi:10.3390/jintelligence5010005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, S., & Neubert, J. C. (2014). On the relation of complex problem solving, personality, fluid intelligence, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Wüstenberg, S., Sonnleitner, P., Brunner, M., & Martin, R. (2013a). A multitrait-multimethod study of assessment instruments for complex problem solving. Intelligence, 41, 579–596. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, S., Holt, D. V., & Funke, J. (2013b). Perspectives on problem solving in educational assessment: Analytical, interactive, and collaborative problem solving. Journal of Problem Solving, 6, 71–91. doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Stadler, M., & Wüstenberg, S. (2015). Assessing complex problem-solving skills with multiple complex systems. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(3), 356–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.989263.

  • Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). The ATC21S method. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 3–33). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J., & Rubinstein, Y. (2001). The importance of noncognitice skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. American Economic Review, 91(2), 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P. (2008). Expanding the conceptualization and measurement of applied problem solving and coping: From stages to dimensions to the almost forgotten cultural context. American Psychologist, 63, 803–805. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, O. (2012). Risky decisions: Active risk management. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 26–30. doi:10.1177/0963721411422055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors, 50, 456–460. doi:10.1518/001872008X288385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, W. C. (2003). Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 495–511. doi:10.1177/1046878103258201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, W. C. (2008). A systemic-constructivist approach to the facilitation and debriefing of simulations and games. Simulation & Gaming, 41, 663–680. doi:10.1177/1046878108319867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leutner, D., Fleischer, J., Wirth, J., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). Analytische und dynamische Problemlösekompetenz im Lichte internationaler Schulleistungsvergleichsstudien: Untersuchungen zur Dimensionalität [Analytical and dynamic problem-solving competence from an international educational studies perspective. Analysis of dimensionality]. Psychologische Rundschau, 63, 34–42. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, A. J., & Wearing, A. J. (1980). Complexity and decision making. Behavioral Science, 25, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1956). The inversion of functions defined by Turing machines. In C. E. Shannon & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Automata studies (AM-34). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, H. F., Chuang, S., & Chung, G. K. W. K. (2003). Issues in the computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(3), 361–373. doi:10.1080/0969594032000148190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework. Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (Vol. V). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoppek, W., & Fischer, A. (2015). Complex problem solving – single ability or complex phenomenon? Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1669), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R., Pittnauer, S., & Hohnisch, M. (2012). Dealing with dynamic decision problems when knowledge of the environment is limited: An approach based on goal systems. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(5), 443–457. doi:10.1002/bdm.738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spering, M., Wagener, D., & Funke, J. (2005). The role of emotions in complex problem-solving. Cognition & Emotion, 19(8), 1252–1261. doi:10.1080/02699930500304886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Frensch, P. A. (Eds.). (1991). Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohschneider, S., & Güss, D. (1999). The fate of the Moros: A cross-cultural exploration of strategies in complex and dynamic decision making. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (1994). Creative problem solving: An overview. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving and creativity (pp. 223–236). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester, F. (2007). The art of interconnected thinking. Ideas and tools for tackling complexity. Munich: MCB-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2000). Does motivation affect performance via persistence? Learning and Instruction, 10, 293–309. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00031-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S. L. (1996). Everyday problem solving. In J. E. Birren, K. W. Schaie, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 287–307). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. (2006). The development of creative problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 96–113. doi:10.1039/b6rp90003h.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S., & Frye, D. (1997). Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 198–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Bruce Beswick, Esther Care, and Mark Wilson for extensive and helpful comments to earlier versions of this manuscript. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest. The research was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) to the first author (Az. Fu 173/14).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Funke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Funke, J., Fischer, A., Holt, D.V. (2018). Competencies for Complexity: Problem Solving in the Twenty-First Century. In: Care, E., Griffin, P., Wilson, M. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educational Assessment in an Information Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65366-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65368-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics