Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Successes and Failures in Building Learning Environments to Promote Deep Learning: The Value of Conversational Agents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Informational Environments

Abstract

This chapter describes some attempts to promote deep learning (as opposed to shallow learning) through conversational pedagogical agents. Learning environments with agents have been developed to serve as substitutes for humans who range in expertise from novices to experts. For example, AutoTutor helps students learn by holding a dialogue in natural language with the student, whereas trialogues have two agents interacting with the student in a three-way interaction. Agents can guide the interaction with the learner, instruct the learner what to do, and interact with other agents to model ideal behavior, strategies, reflections, and social interactions. Some agents generate speech, gestures, body movements, and facial expressions in ways similar to people. These agent-based systems have sometimes facilitated deep learning more than conventional learning environments. Agents have shown learning gains on a variety of subject matters and skills, including science, technology, engineering, mathematics, research methods, metacognition, and language comprehension. Learning environments are currently being developed to improve lifelong learning and collaborative problem solving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1279–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Moos, D., Johnson, A., & Chauncey, A. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes used during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 45, 210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, E., & Shaffer, D. W. (2015). Learning in an urban and regional planning practicum: The view from educational ethnography. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(4), 369–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. (1985). Differences in standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S., D’Mello, S. K., Rodrigo, M. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J., Sulcer, B., & Roscoe, R. (2010). Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 5, 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braasch, J., Rouet, J.-F., Vivert, N., & Britt, M. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40, 450–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 48–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, A. P., & Smith, N. (2013). Workplace basics: The skills employees need and employers want. Human Resource Development International, 16, 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., Tanner-Smith, E., & Killingsworth, S. (2014). Digital games, design and learning: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., Brittingham, J. K., Williams, J. L., & Shubeck, K. (2012). Promoting vicarious learning of physics using deep questions with explanations. Computers & Education, 58, 1042–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction, 20, 147–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S., Lehman, S., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholson, B., Witherspoon, A., Morgan, B., Brittingham, J. K., Coles, R., Graesser, A. C., … Craig, S. D. (2009). Exploring the deep-level reasoning questions effect during vicarious learning among eighth to eleventh graders in the domains of computer literacy and Newtonian physics. Instructional Science, 37, 487–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 356–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C. (2015). Deeper learning with advances in discourse science and technology. Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C. (2016). Conversations with AutoTutor help students learn. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Cai, Z., Baer, W., Olney, A. M., Hu, X., Reed, M., & Greenberg, D. (2016). Reading comprehension lessons in AutoTutor for the Center for the Study of Adult Literacy. In S. Crossley & D. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 288–292). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B. C., & Olney, A. (2005). AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Transactions in Education, 48, 612–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A., & D’Mello, S. K. (2012). Emotions during the learning of difficult material. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 183–225). New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Forsyth, C. M., & Foltz, P. (2016). Assessing conversation quality, reasoning, and problem solving performance with computer agents. In B. Csapo, J. Funke, & A. Schleicher (Eds.), On the nature of problem solving: A look behind PISA 2012 problem solving assessment (pp. 275–297). Heidelberg, Germany: OECD Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Forsyth, C., & Lehman, B. (2017). Two heads are better than one: Learning from agents in conversational trialogues. Teacher College Record, 119(3), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Hu, X., Nye, B., & Sottilare, R. (2016). Intelligent tutoring systems, serious games, and the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT). In H. F. O’Neil, E. L. Baker, & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Using games and simulation for teaching and assessment (pp. 58–79). Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Langston, M. C., & Baggett, W. B. (1993). Exploring information about concepts by asking questions. In G. V. Nakamura, R. M. Taraban, & D. Medin (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Categorization by humans and machines (Vol. 29, pp. 411–436). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Li, H., & Forsyth, C. (2014). Learning by communicating in natural language with conversational agents. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 374–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M. M. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 180–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Olde, B. A., Cooper-Pye, E., & Whitten, S. (2005). Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: Comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1235–1247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A., Ozuru, Y., & Sullins, J. (2009). What is a good question? In M. G. McKeown & L. Kucan (Eds.), Threads of coherence in research on the development of reading ability (pp. 112–141). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., O’Reilly, T., Jeon, M., & McDaniel, B. (2007). SEEK Web tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Holt, D. V., Goldhammer, F., & Funke, J. (2013). Computer-based assessment of Complex Problem Solving: Concept, implementation, and application. Educational Technology Research and Development., 61, 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). ATC21S method. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Millis, K., Graesser, A. C., Butler, H., Forsyth, C., & Cai, Z. (2012). Operation ARA: A computerized learning game that teaches critical thinking and scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Nature Partner Journal: Science of Learning, 1, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century sills (pp. 37–55). Heidelberg, GA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2006). Applications of human tutorial dialog in AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system. Revista Signos, 39, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1036–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. L., & Lester, J. C. (2016). Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, Twenty years later. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. W., & Valente, A. (2009). Tactical language and culture training systems: Using artificial intelligence to teach foreign languages and cultures. AI Magazine, 30, 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. C., & Perfetti, C. (2012). The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) framework: Bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 757–798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, K., Britt, A., Millis, K., & Graesser, A. (2012). Improving the efficiency of dialogue in tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 22(5), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, B., D’Mello, S. K., Strain, A., Mills, C., Gross, M., Dobbins, A., … Graesser, A. C. (2013). Inducing and tracking confusion with contradictions during complex learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22, 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning “play” into “work” and “work” into “play”: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257–307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2006). Why the changing American economy calls for 21st century learning: Answers to educators’ questions. New Directions for Youth Development, 110, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, R. F. (2015). What about expository text? In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 348–361). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., Calderhead, W. J., Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E. C., & Freer, B. D. (2010). Learning the control of variables strategy in higher and lower achieving classrooms: Contributions of explicit instruction and experimentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., De Palma, M., & Frijters, J. C. (2012). Evaluating the efficacy of remediation for struggling readers in high school. Journal of Learning Disabilities., 45, 151–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, R. H. (1998). Test predictions over text material. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T., Best, R., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medimorecc, M. A., Pavlik, P., Olney, A., Graesser, A. C., & Risko, E. F. (2015). The language of instruction: Compensating for challenge in lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 971–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millis, K., Forsyth, C., Wallace, P., Graesser, A. C., & Timmins, G. (2017). The impact of game-like features on learning from an intelligent tutoring system. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 22(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millis, K., Graesser, A. C., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). Operation ARA: A serious game that combines intelligent tutoring and learning principles to teach science. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 169–183). Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B., Keshtkar, F., Graesser, A., & Shaffer, D. W. (2013). Automating the mentor in a serious game: A discourse analysis using finite state machines. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Human computer interaction international 2013 (Vol. 374, pp. 591–595). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). Improving adult literacy instruction: Options for practice and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). Assessing 21st century skills. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, B. D., Graesser, A. C., & Hu, X. (2014). AutoTutor and family: A review of 17 years of natural language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 427–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 collaborative problem solving framework. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collabo rative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015). Adults, computers and problem solving: What’s the problem? Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved August 27, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264236844-en .

  • Olney, A., D’Mello, S. K., Person, N., Cade, W., Hays, P., Williams, C., … Graesser, A. C. (2012). Guru: A computer tutor that models expert human tutors. In S. Cerri, W. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) 2012 (pp. 256–261). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition & Instruction, 19, 143–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottge, B., Graesser, A. C., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., & Metcalf, J. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning: A practice guide (NCER 2007–2004). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence. New York, NY: International University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, D. N., & Braasch, J. L. G. (Eds.). (2014). Processing inaccurate information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. P., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2011). Integrating learning, problem solving, and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21, 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rus, V., D’Mello, S., Hu, X., & Graesser, A.C. (2013). Recent advances in intelligent systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine, 34, 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rus, V., Lintean, M., Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Text-to-text similarity of statements. In P. McCarthy & C. Boonthum-Denecke (Eds.), Applied natural language processing: Identification, investigation, and resolution (pp. 110–121). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, J. P., & Albro, E. (2013). Assessing reading in the 21st century: Aligning and applying advances in the reading and measurement sciences. Lanham, MD: R&L Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors, 50(3), 540–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swartout, W., Nye, B. D., Hartholt, A., Reilly, A., Graesser, A. C., VanLehn, K., … Rosenberg, M. (2016). Designing a personal assistant for life long learning (PAL3). In Z. Markov & I. Russel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 491–496). Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M.J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M.T. McCrudden, J. Magliano, & G. Schraw (eds.), Relevance instructions and goal-focusing in text learning (pp. 123-140). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31, 3–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, W., Cole, R., Bolaños, D., Buchenroth-Martin, C., Svirsky, E., & Weston, T. (2013). My science tutor: A conversational multimedia virtual tutor. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1115–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the National Science Foundation (0325428, 633918, 0834847, 0918409, 1108845, 1443068), the Institute of Education Sciences (R305B07460, R305B070349, R305A080594, R305C120001), and the Office of Naval Research (N00014-00-1-0600, N00014-12-C-0643; N00014-16-C-3027). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, 202 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN, 38152-3230, USA

    Arthur C. Graesser, Anne M. Lippert & Andrew J. Hampton

Authors
  1. Arthur C. Graesser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne M. Lippert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew J. Hampton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur C. Graesser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM), Tübingen, Germany

    Jürgen Buder

  2. Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM), Tübingen, Germany

    Friedrich W. Hesse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Graesser, A.C., Lippert, A.M., Hampton, A.J. (2017). Successes and Failures in Building Learning Environments to Promote Deep Learning: The Value of Conversational Agents. In: Buder, J., Hesse, F. (eds) Informational Environments . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation