Skip to main content

What Is Driving Marriage and Cohabitation in Low Fertility Countries?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Low Fertility Regimes and Demographic and Societal Change

Abstract

In an earlier paper, I argued that “effective singlehood” in East Asia had run ahead of the West – if cohabitation was equated with marriage. In the decade since then, some interesting changes have taken place. In Europe, singlehood on the whole appears to have increased, even when those currently cohabiting are removed from the “single” category, but the trend is less clear when those who have ever cohabited are removed from the category. Though cohabitation has increased in Spain and Italy, these countries still have much higher proportions effectively single than do Scandinavia or Western Europe. Effective singlehood is increasing more sharply in some of the countries of East Asia than in Europe, tending to further widen the gap between the higher levels of effective singlehood in East Asian countries than those in Europe. The chapter goes on to examine the meanings of cohabitation across Europe, the limited evidence about trends in cohabitation in East Asia, and whether rising prevalence of singlehood by choice in East Asia and some European countries is evidence of the second demographic transition. The similarity in some aspects of family patterns between Southern European and East Asian countries are analysed in relation to high levels of effective singlehood in these countries. In an earlier paper, I argued that “effective singlehood” in East Asia had run ahead of the West – if cohabitation was equated with marriage. In the decade since then, some interesting changes have taken place. In Europe, singlehood on the whole appears to have increased, even when those currently cohabiting are removed from the “single” category, but the trend is less clear when those who have ever cohabited are removed from the category. Though cohabitation has increased in Spain and Italy, these countries still have much higher proportions effectively single than do Scandinavia or Western Europe. Effective singlehood is increasing more sharply in some of the countries of East Asia than in Europe, tending to further widen the gap between the higher levels of effective singlehood in East Asian countries than those in Europe. The chapter goes on to examine the meanings of cohabitation across Europe, the limited evidence about trends in cohabitation in East Asia, and whether rising prevalence of singlehood by choice in East Asia and some European countries is evidence of the second demographic transition. The similarity in some aspects of family patterns between Southern European and East Asian countries are analysed in relation to high levels of effective singlehood in these countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The figures for Poland and the Russian Federation indicate a much lower mean age at marriage than in any of the other countries in the table. Unfortunately, data on these two countries are not available for 2000.

  2. 2.

    As an aside, it might be noted that Fig. 9.1 shows that, although all the highly developed East Asian countries have experienced remarkable increases in singlehood, singlehood has not increased nearly as dramatically for Asia as a whole, because the three largest Asian countries (China, India and Indonesia) have had only modest increases from very low rates of singlehood.

  3. 3.

    Aside from Singapore, the one exception to sharp increases in proportions single is China, where fertility has reached low levels (probably a TFR of 1.5, if not lower), though not as low as those of most other East Asian countries. It is likely that the lower level of socio-economic development in China than in other East Asian countries is the main reason (Jones and Yeung 2014).

  4. 4.

    Kertzer et al. (2006) claim that the argument low fertility in Italy has to do with factors such as the reluctance of the Italian state to provide public daycare for very young children overlooks the strong cultural bias in Italy against the practice of sending very young children to daycare centers. ***

References

  • Bumpass, L., Rindfuss, R., Choe, M. K., & Tsuya, N. (2008, November 12–14). The institutional context of low fertility: The case of Japan. Paper presented at the International Conference on Low Fertility and Reproductive Health in East and Southeast Asia, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Comparative Social Surveys. (2012). European Social Survey (ESS), Round 6 (2012). London: City University London, Centre for Comparative Social Surveys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.-S. (2010). South Korea under compressed modernity: Familial political economy in transition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (2012). Goode’s world revolution and family patterns: A reconsideration at fifty years. Population and Development Review, 38(4), 577–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Zuanna, G., & Micheli, G. A. (2004). Strong family and low fertility: A paradox? New Perspectives in interpreting contemporary family and reproductive behaviour. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez-Folgueras, M., & Castro-Martin, T. (2013). Cohabitation in Spain: No longer a marginal path to family formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 422–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteve, A., Lesthaeghe, R., & Lopez-Gay, A. (2012). The Latin American cohabitation boom, 1970–2007. Population and Development Review, 38(1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festy, P. (2000, October 16–18). Looking for European demography, desperately? Paper presented at the Expert Group Meeting on Population Responses to Population Ageing and Population Decline, United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fokkema, T., & Liefbroner, A. C. (2008). Trends in living arrangements in Europe: Convergence or divergence? Demographic Research, 19, 1351–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frejka, T., Jones, G., & Sardon, J.-P. (2010). East Asian childbearing patterns and policy developments. Population and Development Review, 36(3), 579–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T., & Jasilionene, A. (2009). The end of “lowest-low” fertility? Population and Development Review, 35(4), 663–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1214–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A. C., & Poortman, A.-R. (2011). The meaning of cohabitation across Europe, Netherlands interdisciplinary Demographic Institute. http://epc2012.princeton.edu/papers/120762

  • Johnson-Hanks, J. A., Bachrach, C. A., Philip Morgan, S., & Kohler, H.-P. (2011). Understanding family change and variation: Toward a theory of conjunctural action. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. W. (2007). Delayed marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia. Population and Development Review, 33(3), 453–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. W. (2012a). Population policy in a prosperous city-state: Dilemmas for Singapore. Population and Development Review, 38(2), 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. W. (2012b). International marriage in Asia: What do we know, and what do we need to know? In D.-S. Kim (Ed.), Cross-border marriage: Global trends and diversity. Seoul: Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. W., & Gubhaju, B. (2009). Factors influencing changes in mean age at first marriage and proportions never marrying in the low-fertility countries of East and Southeast Asia. Asian Population Studies, 5(3), 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. W., & Yeung, W.-J. J. (2014). Marriage in Asia. Journal of Family Issues, 35(12), 1567–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. W., Yanxia, Z., & Zhi, P. C. P. (2012). Understanding high levels of singlehood in Singapore. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 731–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasearu, K., & Kutsar, D. (2010). Patterns behind unmarried cohabitation trends in Europe. European Societies, 13(2), 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D. I., White, M. J., Bernardi, L. & Gabrielli, G. (2006, April). Toward a better theory of very low fertility: Lessons from Italy, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Law and Policy, 26(1), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livi Bacci, M. (2001). Too few children, too much family. Daedalus, 130(3), 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. (1992). Convergence or compromise in historical family change? In E. Berquo & P. Xenos (Eds.), Family systems and cultural change (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrskyla, M., Kohler, H.-P., & Billari, F. C. (2009). Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature, 460, 741–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazio, T., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2003). The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population, 19, 47–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noack, T., Bernhardt, E., & Wiik, K. A. (2014). Cohabitation or marriage? Contemporary living arrangements in the West. In A. Abela & J. Walker (Eds.), Contemporary issues in family studies: Global perspectives on partnership, parenting and support in a changing world (pp. 16–30). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereiro, T. G., Pace, R., & Didonna, M. G. (2014). Entering first union: The choice between cohabitation and marriage among women in Italy and Spain. Journal of Population Research, 31, 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Lappegard, T., Jasilioniene, A., Di Giulio, P., Keizer, R., Koeppen, K., Berghammer, C., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2009). Examining nonmarital childbearing in Europe: How does union context differ across countries? (MPIDR Working Paper WP 2009-021) Rostock: Max Plank Institute for Demographic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymo, J., Iwasawa, M., & Bumpass, L. (2009). Cohabitation and family formation in Japan. Demography, 46(4), 785–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka, T., & Toulemon, L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 85–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, T. (2008). Korea’s strong familism and lowest-low fertility. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 17, 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (2004). Between sex and power: Family in the world, 1900–2000. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuya, N. O. (2015). Below-replacement fertility in Japan: Patterns, factors and policy implications. In R. R. Rindfuss & M. K. Choe (Eds.), Low and lower fertility: Variations across developed countries. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuya, N. O., Bumpass, L. L., Choe, M. K., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2013). Employment and household tasks of Japanese couples, 1994–2009. Demographic Research, 27, 705–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenos, P., Achmad, S., Lin, H. S., Luis, P. K., Podhisita, C., Raymundo, C., & Thapa, S. (2006). Delayed Asian transitions to adulthood: A perspective from national youth surveys. Asian Population Studies, 2(2), 149–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Wajihah Hamid and Divya Ramchand for research assistance in the preparation of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, G. (2018). What Is Driving Marriage and Cohabitation in Low Fertility Countries?. In: Poston, Jr., D. (eds) Low Fertility Regimes and Demographic and Societal Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64061-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64061-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64061-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics