Abstract
This chapter explores the relationship between research and practice. It argues that much can be accomplished by thinking about the emerging and rapidly evolving profession of Disaster Science and Management as a shared enterprise that includes both academics and practitioners. The chapter identifies some characteristics of academics and practitioners that are well suited to improving the profession. It provides descriptions of critical roles that individuals in this area are already engaging in or might engage in. It includes a discussion of barriers to a more-connected and cross-fertilized community and highlights several historical and ongoing efforts to improve the connection between research and application. It concludes with a discussion of the future of research and practice in disaster science and management and a discussion of the research agenda for this topic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
See for example, Lucien Canton (2007) Emergency Management: Concepts and Strategies for Effective Programs, which provides insights on the field of emergency management derived from a lifetime of service in senior roles such as the Director of Emergency Services for the City of San Francisco.
- 2.
See https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/collegelist/embadegree/ for a list of current Emergency Management degree options. Last accessed June 14, 2017.
- 3.
https://hazards.colorado.edu/ . Last accessed June 15, 2017.
- 4.
https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/ . Last accessed June 15, 2017.
- 5.
http://dels.nas.edu/global/dr/Board-Members. Last accessed June 15, 2017.
- 6.
https://www.iaem.com/. Last accessed June 15, 2017.
- 7.
See: https://www.ndsu.edu/emgt/graduate/current_students/research_resources/ for a useful list of centers. Last accessed June 15, 2017.
- 8.
See Green, Ottoson, Garcia, Hiatt, and Roditis, (2014) for an example of this type of work in Public Health.
References
Auf der Heide, E. (2004). Common misconceptions about disasters: panic, the “disaster syndrome”, and looting. In M. O’Leaery (Ed.), The first 72 hours: A community approach to disaster preparedness (pp. 340–380). Lincoln, NB: iUniverse Publishing.
Barsky, L. Trainor, J. E., & Torres, M. (2006). Disaster realities in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Revisiting the looting myth. DRC Miscellaneous Repot.
Buika, J., Comfort, L., Shapiro, C., & Wenger, D. (2004). Building researcher and practitioner coalitions: Safeguarding our future against disasters. Natural Hazards Observer, 29(2), 1–3.
Canton, L. G. (2007). Emergency management: Concepts and strategies for effective programs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Comfort, L., Waugh, W., & Cigler, B. (2012). Emergency management research and practice in public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 539–548.
Cowan, B., & Beavers, J. E. (1994). Earthquake risk reduction in the United States: An assessment of selected user needs and recommendations for the national earthquake hazards reduction program. Final Report Prepared for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Oak Ridge: Tenn.
Cwiak, C. (Unpublished manuscript). Bringing practitioners into the fold: Practical suggestions for successfully bridging the divide between students and practitioners. https://books.google.com/books/about/Bringing_Practitioners_Into_the_Fold.html?id=wnsoQwAACAAJ. Last accessed June 16, 2017.
Dynes, R., & Quarantelli, E. L. (1968). What looting in civil disturbances really means. Trans-action, 5(6), 9–14.
Eriksson, J., & Sundelius, B. (2005). Moulding minds that form policy: How to make research useful. International Studies Perspectives, 6(1), 51–71.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2013). National response framework, (2nd ed.). Retrieved from: https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1914-25045-1246/final_national_response_framework_20130501.pdf.
Fischer, H. W. (1998). Response to disasters fact versus fiction & its perpetuation, (2nd ed.). University Press of America.
Fothergill, A. (2000). Knowledge transfer between researchers and practitioners. Natural Hazards Review, 1(2), 91–98.
George, A. L. (1993). Bridging the gap: Theory and practice in foreign policy. Washington, D.C.: US Institute of Peace Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Gori, P. L. (Ed.). (1993). Applications of research from the U.S. Geological Survey program, assessment of regional earthquake hazards and risk along the Wasatch Front, Utah. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1519, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Green, L. W., Ottoson, J. M., García, C., Hiatt, R. A., & Roditis, M. L. (2014) Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization and integration. Frontiers in Public Health Services & Systems Research, 3(1), 3.
Johnson, L. A., & Durham, T. C. (1995). ‘Towards an action agenda for increasing research utilization in the central United States. In Report on the Natural Hazards Research Symposium, Translating Research Into Practice. Louisville: CUSEC.
Kendra, J. (2007). So are you still active in the field, or do you just teach?. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4(3) Article 8.
Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533.
Knowles, S. G. (2011). The disaster experts: Mastering risk in modern America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lee, A. C. K. (2016). Barriers to evidence-based disaster management in Nepal: A qualitative study. Public Health, 133, 99–106.
Lindblom, C. (1990). Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lindell, M., & Perry, R. (2011). The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616–632.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Malone, W. (1993). Research definition and location of research: A user’s view. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11(1), 63–70.
Meyers, M. (1993). Bridging the gap between research and practice. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11(1), 41–54.
Milleti, D. S. & Sorenson, J. H. (1990). Communication of emergency public warnings: A Social Science perspective and state of-the-art assessment. Oak Ridge national Laboratory Report ORNL-6609.
Neal, D. (1993). Integrating research and practice: An overview of issues. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11(1), 5–13.
Nye, J. (2008). Bridging the gap between theory and policy. Political Psychology, 29(4), 593–603.
Oyola-Yemaiel, A., & Wilson, J. (2004). Academic/practitioner interface. FEMA’s Higher Education Conference.
Quarantelli, E. L. (1954). The nature and conditions of panic. American Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 267–275. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2772684.
Quarantelli, E. L. (1993). Converting disaster scholarship into effective disaster planning and managing: Possibilities and limitations. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11(1), 15–39.
Quarantellli, E. L., & Dynes, R. (1970). Property norms and looting: Their patterns in community crises. Phylon: The Atlanta University Review of Race and Culture, 31(2), 168–182.
Ragin, C., & Amoroso, L. (2010). Constructing social research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rubin, C. B., & Webb, A. C. (1987). Workshop for users of natural hazards research. Final Report George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schraagen, J. M., Chipman, S. F., & Shalin, V. (2014). Cognitive task analysis. New York: Psychology Press (Originally published by Lawrence Erlbaum in 2000).
Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.
Trainor, J. E., & Barsky, L. (2011). Reporting for duty? A synthesis of research on role conflict, strain, and abandonment among emergency responders during disasters. Virginia Department of Emergency Management and Disaster Research Center Miscellaneous Report #71.
Trainor, J. E., & Subbio, T. (Eds.). (2014). Critical issues in disaster science and management: A dialogue between researchers and practitioners. Emmitsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency Higher Education Program. https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/docs/critical-issues-in-disaster-science-and-management.pdf.
Zelikow, P. (1994). Foreign policy engineering: From theory to practice and back again. International Security, 18(4), 143–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trainor, J.E., Stern, E.K., Subbio, T. (2018). On Bridging Research and Practice in Disaster Science and Management: Unified System or Impossible Mission?. In: Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., Trainor, J. (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63253-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63254-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)