Abstract
To date, virtual ways of working have yet to substantially reduce demand for business travel. Emerging research claims that virtual and physical work complement rather than substitute for one another. This suggests travel demand stems from business strategies and achieving business outcomes. In building on these ideas, this chapter draws upon Schatzki’s conception of timespace to capture changes in how two UK-based global construction and engineering consulting firms organise work and the implications in terms of demand for business travel. Over time, particular forms of spatially stretched organisations which have developed are found to require the interweaving of timespaces through travel. As such, how each firm has evolved has in turn created the contemporary situation of significant and hard to reduce demand for travel.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Though Schatzki uses the term activity timespace to differentiate it from Heidegger’s notion of timespace which is also a crucial feature of human life, our use of timespace accords with the concept as developed by Schatzki.
Bibliography
Aguilera, A. 2008. Business travel and mobile workers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42: 1109–1116.
Anable, J., A. Darnton, K. Pangbourne, et al. 2015. Evidence base review of business travel behaviour to inform development of a segmentation of businesses. Main report, University of Aberdeen (PPRO 04/06/43). Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/415569/business-travel-behaviour-main-report.pdf
Arnfalk, P., and B. Kogg. 2003. Service transformation—Managing a shift from business travel to virtual meetings. Journal of Cleaner Production 11: 859–872.
Baark, E. 1999. Engineering consultancy: An assessment of it-enabled international delivery of services. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 11: 55–74.
Bryman, A. 2008. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buch, A., and V. Andersen. 2015. Team and project work in engineering practices. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 5: 27.
Cohen, M.J. 2010. Destination unknown: Pursuing sustainable mobility in the face of rival societal aspirations. Research Policy 39: 459–470.
Coyne, R.D., F. Sudweeks, and D. Haynes. 1996. Who needs the internet? Computer-mediated communication in design firms. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23: 749–770.
Davidson, R., and B. Cope. 2003 Business travel: Conferences, incentive travel, exhibitions, corporate hospitality and corporate travel. Pearson Education, Financial Times Press.
Dicken, P. 2011. Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. London: Sage.
Faulconbridge, J.R. 2006. Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 517–540.
Faulconbridge, J.R., J.V. Beaverstock, B. Derudder, et al. 2009. Corporate ecologies of business travel in professional service firms working towards a research agenda. European Urban and Regional Studies 16: 295–308.
Gallié, E.-P., and R. Guichard. 2005. Do collaboratories mean the end of face-to-face interactions? An evidence from the ISEE project. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14: 517–532.
Gustafson, P. 2006. Work-related travel, gender and family obligations. Work, Employment and Society 20: 513–530.
———. 2012. Managing business travel: Developments and dilemmas in corporate travel management. Tourism Management 33: 276–284.
Harvey, D. 1989. The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Haynes, P. 2010. Information and communication technology and international business travel: Mobility allies? Mobilities 5: 547–564.
Hydle, K.M. 2015. Temporal and spatial dimensions of strategizing. Organization Studies 36: 643–663.
Jones, A. 2007. More than ‘managing across borders?’ The complex role of face-to-face interaction in globalizing law firms. Journal of Economic Geography 7: 223–246.
———. 2013. Conceptualising business mobilities: Towards an analytical framework. Research in Transportation Business & Management 9: 58–66.
Kakabadse, A., and N. Kakabadse. 2001. Outsourcing in the public services: A comparative analysis of practice, capability and impact. Public Administration and Development 21: 401–413.
Lassen, C. 2010. Environmentalist in business class: An analysis of air travel and environmental attitude. Transport Reviews 30: 733–751.
Lyons, G. 2013. Business travel—The social practices surrounding meetings. Research in Transportation Business & Management 9: 50–57.
Millar, J., and J. Salt. 2008. Portfolios of mobility: The movement of expertise in transnational corporations in two sectors—aerospace and extractive industries. Global Networks 8: 25–50.
Neuman, W.L. 2011. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson.
Orr, J.E. 1996. Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5: 243–263.
Salt, J., and P. Wood. 2012. Recession and international corporate mobility. Global Networks 12: 425–445.
Schatzki, T.R. 2005. Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies 26: 465–484.
———. 2006a. On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies 27: 1863–1873.
———. 2006b. The time of activity. Continental Philosophy Review 39: 155–182.
———. 2009. Timespace and the organization of social life. In Time, consumption and everyday life: Practice, materiality and culture, ed. E. Shove, F. Trentmann, and R. Wilk, 35–48. Oxford: Berg.
———. 2012a. A primer on practices. In Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies, ed. J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, et al., 13–26. Rotterdam: Sense.
———. 2012b. The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38: 207–226.
Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M.T. Watson. 2012. The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
Shove, Elizabeth, G. Walker, et al. 2014. What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory, Culture & Society 31: 41–58.
Storme, T., J. Faulconbridge, J.V. Beaverstock, et al. 2016. Mobility and professional networks in academia: An exploration of the obligations of presence. Mobilities: 1–20.
Strengers, Y. 2015. Meeting in the global workplace: Air travel, telepresence and the body. Mobilities 10: 592–608.
Thrift, N.J. 2008. Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
Tombesi, P. 2001. A true south for design? The new international division of labour in architecture. ARQ: Architectural Research Quarterly 5: 171–180.
UNESCO. 2010. Engineering: Issues, challenges and opportunities for development. United nations educational, scientific and cultural organisation, Paris. Available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001897/189753e.pdf
Urry, J. 2003. Social networks, travel and talk. The British Journal of Sociology 54: 155–175.
———. 2012. Do mobile lives have a future? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 103: 566–576.
Vendramin, P., G. Valenduc, I. Rolland, et al. 2000. Flexible work practices and communication technology. Report for the European Commission, SOE1-CT97–1064, European Commission, DG Research. Downloaded on 13: 2007.
Wickham, J., and A. Vecchi. 2009. The importance of business travel for industrial clusters–Making sense of nomadic workers. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 91: 245–255.
World Travel and Tourism Council. 2011. Business travel: A catalyst for economic performance. London: World Travel and Tourism Council.
Yanow, D., and P. Schwartz-Shea. 2006. Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. New York: Sharpe.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, I., Faulconbridge, J., Marsden, G., Anable, J. (2018). Demanding Business Travel: The Evolution of the Timespaces of Business Practice. In: Hui, A., Day, R., Walker, G. (eds) Demanding Energy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61991-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61991-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61990-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61991-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)