Skip to main content

Are Stingless Bees a Broadly Polylectic Group? An Empirical Study of the Adjustments Required for an Improved Assessment of Pollen Diet in Bees

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pot-Pollen in Stingless Bee Melittology

Abstract

This research describes simple calculations for pollen diet studies to improve the understanding of bee natural history. The stingless bees (tribe Meliponini) have been classified as broadly polylectic as they utilize more than 10% of the pollen host species of the entire melittophilous flora at a site or more than 25% of the available plant families. However, when considering pollen types, it was not possible to classify three bee species in this manner. For this reason, different calculation adjustments on foraged and available items were applied. For the former, two threshold values (10% and 5%), to identify abundant and discard minor and contaminant pollen resources, were used. For each threshold value, the number of pollen types and the number of pollen species ascribed to each pollen type were calculated. For the available items, spatial and temporal adjustments were estimated. When these adjustments were applied, in some cases bees were identified at higher specialization categories; broad polylectic was recorded only in six cases for Melipona orbignyi and Tetragonisca fiebrigi. As previously suggested for the other categories, contaminant and minor pollen types should also be excluded in polylectic bees. The threshold values of 10% for species and 25% for families are too high to reach broad polylecty. In addition, no direct comparisons between pollen types and pollen species could be made when working with the palynological data. Thus, simple values were proposed to assess pollen diet of generalist bees: the maximum number of foraged items per nest (contaminants not considered) and the maximum percentage value of foraged versus available items (adjusted). These belong to a wider range of values that can be recognized as degrees of polylecty, allowing for a more precise identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Araújo ED, Costa M, Chaud-Netto J, Fowler HG. 2004. Body size and flight distance in stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini): inference of flight range and possible ecological implications. Brazilian Journal of Biology 64: 563–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Sipes S. 2006. Characterizing floral specialization by bees: analytical methods and a revised lexicon for oligolecty. pp 99–122. In Waser NM, Ollerton J, eds. Plant-Pollinator Interactions. From specialization to generalization. The University of Chicago Press; Chicago, USA. 488 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilla G, Caccavari M, Bartoloni NJ, Roig-Alsina A. 2012. The foraging preferences of two species of Melissodes Latreille (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Eucerini) in farmed sunflower in Argentina. Grana 51: 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalmazzo M, Vossler FG. 2015a. Assessment of the pollen diet in a wood-dwelling augochlorine bee (Halictidae) using different approaches. Apidologie 46: 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalmazzo M, Vossler FG. 2015b. Pollen host selection by a broadly polylectic halictid bee in relation to resource availability. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 9: 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk P, Joosten H. 2007. The difference between pollen types and plant taxa: a plea for clarity and scientific freedom. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart / Quaternary Science Journal 56: 162–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman G. 1960. The acetolysis method, a revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 54: 561–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrncir M, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG. 2000. Recruitment behavior in stingless bees, Melipona scutellaris and Melipona quadrifasciata. II. Possible mechanisms of communication. Apidologie 31: 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarau S, Hrncir M, Schmidt VM, Zucchi R, Barth FG. 2003. Effectiveness of recruitment behavior in stingless bees (Apidae, Meliponini). Insectes Sociaux 50: 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joosten H, De Klerk P. 2002. What´s in a name? Some thougths on pollen classification, identification, and nomenclature in Quaternary palynology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 122: 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinert-Giovannini A, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. 1987. Aspects of the trophic niche of Melipona marginata marginata Lepeletier (Apidae, Meliponinae). Apidologie 18: 69–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin LL, Neff JL, Simpson BB. 2008. The evolution of a pollen diet: Host choice and diet breadth of Andrena bees (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Apidologie 39: 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD. 2007. The bees of the world, 2 edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press; Baltimore, USA. 953 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD. 2013. The Meliponini. pp 3–17. In Vit P, Pedro SRM, Roubik DW, eds. Pot honey: A legacy of stingless bees. Springer; New York, USA. 175 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michez D, Patiny S, Rasmont P, Timmermann K, Vereecken NJ. 2008. Phylogeny and host-plant evolution in Melittidae s.l. (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Apidologie 39: 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michez D, Eardley CD, Timmermann K, Danforth BN. 2010. Unexpected polylecty in the bee genus Meganomia (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Melittidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 83: 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minckley RL, Cane JH, Kervin L. 2000. Origins and ecological consequences of pollen specialization among desert bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 265–271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minckley RL, Roulston TH. 2006. Incidental mutualisms and pollen specialization among bees. pp 69–98. In Waser NM, Ollerton J, eds. Plant-Pollinator Interactions. From specialization to generalization. The University of Chicago Press; Chicago, USA. 488 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller A, Kuhlmann M. 2008. Pollen hosts of western palaearctic bees of the genus Colletes (Hymenoptera: Colletidae): the Asteraceae paradox. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 719–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado DE. 1993. What is the Gran Chaco vegetation in South America? I. A review. Contribution to the study of flora and vegetation of the Chaco. V. Candollea 48: 145–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho M, Kleinert-Giovannini A, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. 1989. Utilization of floral resources by species of Melipona (Apidae, Meliponinae): Floral preferences. Apidologie 20: 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho M, Kleinert-Giovannini A, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. 1990. Important bee plants for stingless bees (Melipona and Trigona) and Africanized honeybees (Apis mellifera) in Neotropical habitats: a review. Apidologie 21: 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho M, Silva MD, Carvalho CAL. 2007. Dinâmica de uso de fontes de pólen por Melipona scutellaris Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apidae): uma análise comparativa com Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), no Domínio Tropical Atlântico. Neotropical Entomology 36: 38–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson CH. 1925. Heterotropic bees. Ecology 6: 412–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson CH. 1926. Revised list of oligolectic bees. Ecology 7: 378–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW. 1982. Seasonality in colony food storage, brood production and adult survivorship: studies of Melipona in tropical forest (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 55: 789–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW. 1989. Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press; New York, USA. 514 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW, Aluja M. 1983. Flight ranges of Melipona and Trigona in tropical forest. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 56: 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipes SD, Tepedino VJ. 2005. Pollen-host specificity and evolutionary patterns of host switching in a clade of specialist bees (Apoidea: Diadasia). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 86: 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torretta JP, Durante SP, Colombo MG, Basilio AM. 2012. Nesting biology of the leafcutting bee Megachile (Pseudocentron) gomphrenoides (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in an agro-ecosystem. Apidologie 43: 624–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torretta JP, Durante SP, Basilio AM. 2014. Nesting ecology of Megachile (Chrysosarus) catamarcensis Schrottky (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), a Prosopis-specialist bee. Journal of Apicultural Research 53: 590–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva-Gutiérrez R, Roubik DW. 2016. More than protein? Bee-flower interactions and effects of disturbance regimes revealed by rare pollen in bee nests. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 10: 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vossler FG. 2013a. The oligolecty status of a specialist bee of South American Prosopis (Fabaceae) supported by pollen analysis and floral visitation methods. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 13: 513–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vossler FG. 2013b. Estudio palinológico de las reservas alimentarias (miel y masas de polen) de “abejas nativas sin aguijón” (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini): un aporte al conocimiento de la interacción abeja-planta en el Chaco Seco de Argentina. Doctoral Thesis. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; La Plata, Argentina. 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossler FG. 2014. A tight relationship between the solitary bee Calliopsis (Ceroliopoeum) laeta (Andrenidae, Panurginae) and Prosopis pollen hosts (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae) in xeric South American woodlands. Journal of Pollination Ecology 14: 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossler FG, Tellería MC, Cunningham M. 2010. Floral resources foraged by Geotrigona argentina (Apidae, Meliponini) in the Argentine Dry Chaco forest. Grana 49: 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuloaga FO, Morrone O, Belgrano MJ. 2008. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares del cono sur (Argentina, Sur de Brasil, Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay). Volumes 1–3. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 107: 1–983, 985–2286, 2287–3348.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am especially thankful to Patricia Vit for her kind invitation to participate in this book and Alicia Basilio for recommending me, Nora Brea for her help in English language, David Roubik and Nora Brea for providing suggestions and critical comments on the manuscript, and Arturo Roig-Alsina for the identification of bees. This study was supported by CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Favio Gerardo Vossler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Table 2.2b

(Tetragonisca fiebrigi) (DOC 236 kb)

Table 2.2c

(Geotrigona argentina) (DOC 91 kb)

Table 2.3

Calculation adjustments on the number of total (T) and forest (F) available plant families (FAMS) and pollen types or species (SPS). Temporal adjustments (T temp and F temp) were performed for the months and seasons when nest samples were taken and for all nests together. The temporal adjustment was calculated on flowerings available during the last 4 months before nest sampling date (a total of 5 months were therefore considered for individual months and 8 months for individual seasons) (DOC 246 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vossler, F.G. (2018). Are Stingless Bees a Broadly Polylectic Group? An Empirical Study of the Adjustments Required for an Improved Assessment of Pollen Diet in Bees. In: Vit, P., Pedro, S., Roubik, D. (eds) Pot-Pollen in Stingless Bee Melittology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61839-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics