Skip to main content

Experiments with Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Programming

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming (CPAIOR 2017)

Abstract

The analysis of infeasible subproblems plays an important role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. There are two fundamentally different concepts to generate valid global constraints from infeasible subproblems. The first is to analyze the sequence of implications, obtained by domain propagation, that led to infeasibility. The result of the analysis is one or more sets of contradicting variable bounds from which so-called conflict constraints can be generated. This concept has its origin in solving satisfiability problems and is similarly used in constraint programming. The second concept is to analyze infeasible linear programming (LP) relaxations. The dual LP solution provides a set of multipliers that can be used to generate a single new globally valid linear constraint. The main contribution of this short paper is an empirical evaluation of two ways to combine both approaches. Experiments are carried out on general MIP instances from standard public test sets such as Miplib2010; the presented algorithms have been implemented within the non-commercial MIP solver SCIP. Moreover, we present a pool-based approach to manage conflicts which addresses the way a MIP solver traverses the search tree better than aging strategies known from SAT solving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The instances are part of the contributed section of Miplib2003.

References

  1. Achterberg, T.: Conflict analysis in mixed integer programming. Discrete Optim. 4(1), 4–20 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Achterberg, T.: Constraint integer programming (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Achterberg, T., Berthold, T.: Hybrid branching. In: Hoeve, W.-J., Hooker, J.N. (eds.) CPAIOR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5547, pp. 309–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01929-6_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Achterberg, T., Koch, T., Martin, A.: MIPLIB 2003. Oper. Res. Lett. 34(4), 361–372 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bénichou, M., Gauthier, J.-M., Girodet, P., Hentges, G., Ribière, G., Vincent, O.: Experiments in mixed-integer linear programming. Math. Program. 1(1), 76–94 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Berthold, T., Gleixner, A.M.: Undercover: a primal MINLP heuristic exploring a largest sub-MIP. Math. Program. 144(1–2), 315–346 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Berthold, T., Hendel, G.: Shift-and-propagate. J. Heuristics 21(1), 73–106 (2015)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bixby, R.E., Boyd, E.A., Indovina, R.R.: MIPLIB: a test set of mixed integer programming problems. SIAM News 25, 16 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brearley, A., Mitra, G., Williams, H.: Analysis of mathematical programming problems prior to applying the simplex algorithm. Math. Program. 8, 54–83 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornuéjols, G., Dawande, M.: A class of hard small 0-1 programs. In: Bixby, R.E., Boyd, E.A., Ríos-Mercado, R.Z. (eds.) IPCO 1998. LNCS, vol. 1412, pp. 284–293. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). doi:10.1007/3-540-69346-7_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dakin, R.J.: A tree-search algorithm for mixed integer programming problems. Comput. J. 8(3), 250–255 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Davey, B., Boland, N., Stuckey, P.J.: Efficient intelligent backtracking using linear programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 14(4), 373–386 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gamrath, G., Fischer, T., Gally, T., Gleixner, A.M., Hendel, G., Koch, T., Maher, S.J., Miltenberger, M., Müller, B., Pfetsch, M.E., Puchert, C., Rehfeldt, D., Schenker, S., Schwarz, R., Serrano, F., Shinano, Y., Vigerske, S., Weninger, D., Winkler, M., Witt, J.T., Witzig, J.: The SCIP optimization suite 3.2. Technical Report 15–60, ZIB, Takustr. 7, 14195 Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ginsberg, M.L.: Dynamic backtracking. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 1, 25–46 (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang, Y., Richards, T., Richards, B.: No-good backmarking with min-conflict repair in constraint satisfaction and optimization. In: PPCP, vol. 94, pp. 2–4. Citeseer (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kılınç Karzan, F., Nemhauser, G.L., Savelsbergh, M.W.P.: Information-based branching schemes for binary linear mixed-integer programs. Math. Program. Comput. 1(4), 249–293 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Koch, T., Achterberg, T., Andersen, E., Bastert, O., Berthold, T., Bixby, R.E., Danna, E., Gamrath, G., Gleixner, A.M., Heinz, S., Lodi, A., Mittelmann, H., Ralphs, T., Salvagnin, D., Steffy, D.E., Wolter, K.: MIPLIB 2010. Math. Program. Comput. 3(2), 103–163 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Land, A.H., Doig, A.G.: An automatic method of solving discrete programming problems. Econometrica 28(3), 497–520 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Linderoth, J.T., Ralphs, T.K.: Noncommercial software for mixed-integer linear programming. Integer Program.: Theor. Pract. 3, 253–303 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Linderoth, J.T., Savelsbergh, M.W.: A computational study of search strategies for mixed integer programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 11(2), 173–187 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Marques-Silva, J.P., Sakallah, K.: Grasp: a search algorithm for propositional satisfiability. IEEE Trans. Comput. 48(5), 506–521 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Pólik, I.: (Re)using dual information in MILP. In: INFORMS Computing Society Conference, Richmond, VA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pólik, I.: Some more ways to use dual information in MILP. In: International Symposium on Mathematical Programming, Pittsburgh, PA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sandholm, T., Shields, R.: Nogood learning for mixed integer programming. In: Workshop on Hybrid Methods and Branching Rules in Combinatorial Optimization, Montréal (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stallman, R.M., Sussman, G.J.: Forward reasoning and dependency-directed backtracking in a system for computer-aided circuit analysis. Artif. Intell. 9(2), 135–196 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Witzig, J., Berthold, T., Heinz, S.: Experiments with conflict analysis in mixed integer programming. Technical report 16–63, ZIB, Takustr. 7, 14195 Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work for this article has been conducted within the Research Campus Modal funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (fund number 05M14ZAM). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakob Witzig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Witzig, J., Berthold, T., Heinz, S. (2017). Experiments with Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Programming. In: Salvagnin, D., Lombardi, M. (eds) Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10335. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59776-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59776-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59775-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59776-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics