Skip to main content

Incorporating Data Inaccuracy Considerations in Process Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2017, EMMSAD 2017)

Abstract

Business processes are designed with the assumption that the data used by the process is an accurate reflection of reality. However, this assumption does not always hold, and situations of data inaccuracy might occur which bear substantial consequences to the process and to business goals. Until now, data inaccuracy has mainly been addressed in the area of business process management as a possible exception at runtime, to be resolved through exception handling mechanisms. Design-time analysis of potential data inaccuracy has been mostly overlooked so far. In this paper we propose a conceptual framework for incorporating data inaccuracy considerations in process models to support an analysis of data inaccuracy at design time and empirically evaluate its usability by process designers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We make a basic assumption here that the IS data structure is well-designed, which means that all relevant domain variables are represented by corresponding data items.

References

  1. Aalst, W.M.: The application of Petri nets to workflow management. J. Circ. Syst. Comput. 8(01), 21–66 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aalst, W.M., Ter Hofstede, A.H., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aebi, D., Perrochon, L.: Towards improving data quality. In: CiSMOD, pp. 273–281 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agmon, N., Ahituv, N.: Assessing data reliability in an information system. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 4, 34–44 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cappiello, C., Pernici, B.: Quality-aware design of repairable processes. In: ICIQ (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cappiello, C., Caro, A., Rodriguez, A., Caballero, I.: An approach to design business processes addressing data quality issues. In: ECIS, p. 216 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cappiello, C., Pernici, B., Villani, L.: Strategies for data quality monitoring in business processes. In: Benatallah, B., Bestavros, A., Catania, B., Haller, A., Manolopoulos, Y., Vakali, A., Zhang, Y. (eds.) WISE 2014. LNCS, vol. 9051, pp. 226–238. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20370-6_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Falge, C., Otto, B., Österle, H.: Data quality requirements of collaborative business processes. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS). IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fawcett, T.: An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27(8), 861–874 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gharib, M., Giorgini, P.: Modeling and reasoning about information quality requirements in business processes. In: Gaaloul, K., Schmidt, R., Nurcan, S., Guerreiro, S., Ma, Q. (eds.) CAISE 2015. LNBIP, vol. 214, pp. 231–245. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19237-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Heravizadeh, M., Mendling, J., Rosemann, M.: Dimensions of business processes quality (QoBP). In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 80–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Mouratidis, H., Giorgini, P.: Secure tropos: a security-oriented extension of the tropos methodology. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 17(02), 285–309 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Orr, K.: Data quality and systems theory. Commun. ACM 41(2), 66–71 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodríguez, A., Caro, A., Cappiello, C., Caballero, I.: A BPMN extension for including data quality requirements in business process modeling. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPMN 2012. LNBIP, vol. 125, pp. 116–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33155-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Russell, N., Aalst, W., Hofstede, A.: Workflow exception patterns. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 288–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11767138_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W., Foulger, C.: Data flow and validation in workflow modeling. In: Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Database Conference, ADC 2004, vol. 27, pp. 207–214 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shankaranarayanan, G., Wang, R.Y., Ziad, M.: IP-MAP: representing the manufacture of an information product. IQ 2000

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sidorova, N., Stahl, C., Trčka, N.: Workflow soundness revisited: checking correctness in the presence of data while staying conceptual. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 530–544. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13094-6_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: On the notion of soft goals in business process modeling. Bus. Process Manage. J. 11(6), 663–679 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soffer, P., Kaner, M., Wand, Y.: Assigning ontological meaning to workflow nets. J. Database Manage. 21(3), 1–35 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Soffer, P.: Mirror, mirror on the wall, can i count on you at all? Exploring data inaccuracy in business processes. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2010. LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 14–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13051-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Wand, Y., Wang, R.Y.: Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Commun. ACM 39(11), 86–95 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 5–33 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zave, P., Jackson, M.: Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 6(1), 1–30 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The first and the second authors are supported by the Israel Science Foundation under grant agreement no. 856/13. The third author is supported by the Israel Science Foundation under grant agreement no. 817/15.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yotam Evron , Pnina Soffer or Anna Zamansky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Evron, Y., Soffer, P., Zamansky, A. (2017). Incorporating Data Inaccuracy Considerations in Process Models. In: Reinhartz-Berger, I., Gulden, J., Nurcan, S., Guédria, W., Bera, P. (eds) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2017 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 287. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59466-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics