Skip to main content

An Analysis of Rough Set-Based Application Tools in the Decision-Making Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends in Information and Communication Technology (IRICT 2017)

Abstract

The rough set theory is one of various methods that are frequently used by researchers in the analysis of complex data to solve different types of problems. Thus, a number of application software and methods have been proposed and published to make use of the benefits of the rough set theory. However, it is quite difficult for a non-rough set expert without any basic knowledge and information to understand and identify the best method or application software. Therefore, this paper proposes to assist the decision maker in selecting the best rough set-based application tool by analysing the capability of several rough set-based application tools in making good decisions. Four rough set-based application tools were selected to deal with the classification problem in the experimental tasks. The tools were ROSE2, 4eMKa2, JAMM and jMAF. The experimental results showed that JAMM, ROSE2 and jMAF returned quite significant results in the classification process. However, the 4eMKA2 performed well in comparison to the other selected software. The validation results of the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and neural network (NN) also indirectly proved that the dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA) is one of the best approaches to be used in decision-making processes, especially in the classification process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Karami, J., Ali Mohammadi, A., Seifouri, T.: Water quality analysis using a variable consistency dominance-based rough set approach. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 43, 25–33 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 56–66 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Qiang, J., Dan, W., Wang, D., Xiao, Z., Chen, H.: Multi-criteria outranking approach with hesitant fuzzy sets. OR Spectr. 36(4), 1001–1019 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Sowinski, R.: Interactive evolutionary multi objective optimization using dominance-based rough set approach. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E.K.: Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications two decades’ review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(8), 4126–4148 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, H., Li, D., Zhai, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, J.: A novel attribute reduction approach for multi-label data based on rough set theory. Inf. Sci. 367–368, 827–847 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Azar, A.T., Inbarani, H.H., Renuga Devi, K.: Improved dominance rough set-based classification system. Neural Comput. Appl. 343, 41–65 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, D., Yang, Y., Dong, Z.: An incremental algorithm for attribute reduction with variable precision rough sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 45, 129–149 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali, R., Siddiqi, M.H., Lee, S.: Rough set-based approaches for discretization: a compact review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 44, 235–263 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Sowiski, R.: Dominance-based rough set approach to decision under uncertainty and time preference. Ann. Oper. Res. 176(1), 41–75 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pawlak, Z.: Rough set theory and its applications. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. 29, 7–10 (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Meng, Z., Shi, Z.: On quick attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Inf. Sci. 330, 226–244 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paolotti, L., Greco, S., Boggia, A.: Multi objective strategies for farms, using the dominance-based rough set approach. Aestimum 65, 95–115 (2014). Firenze University Press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greco, S.: Multicriteria classification by dominance-based rough set approach. In: Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 1–14 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Inuiguchi, M., Yoshioka, Y., Kusunoki, Y.: Variable-precision dominance-based rough set approach and attribute reduction. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 50, 1199–1214 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kadziski, M.: R.S., Greco, S.: Multiple criteria ranking and choice with all compatible minimal cover sets of decision rules. Knowl. Based Syst. 89, 569–583 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Szelag, M., Greco, S., Sowiski, R.: Variable consistency dominance-based rough set approach to preference learning in multicriteria ranking. Inf. Sci. 277, 525–552 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Weng, C.H., Huang, T.C.K., Han, R.P.: Disease prediction with different types of neural network classifiers. Telematics Inform. 2, 277–292 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lam, H.K., Ekong, U.L., Xiao, H., Araujo, B., Ling, H., Chan, S.H., Yan, K.: A study of neural-network-based classifiers for material classification. Neurocomputing 144, 367–377 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Masetic, Z., Subasi, A.: Congestive heart failure detection using random forest classifier. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 130, 54–64 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel, R.K., Giri, V.: Feature selection and classification of mechanical fault of an induction motor using random forest classifier. Perspect. Sci. 8, 334–337 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, T., Xia, D., Tang, H., Yang, X., Li, H.: Classification of steel samples by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and random forest. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 157, 196–201 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hashem, E.M., Mabrouk, M.S.: A study of support vector machine algorithm for liver disease diagnosis. Am. J. Intell. Syst. 4(1), 9–14 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) under Research University Grant Vot-02G31 and Vot-15H17 and Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE) under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS Vot-4F551) for the completion of the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masurah Mohamad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohamad, M., Selamat, A. (2018). An Analysis of Rough Set-Based Application Tools in the Decision-Making Process. In: Saeed, F., Gazem, N., Patnaik, S., Saed Balaid, A., Mohammed, F. (eds) Recent Trends in Information and Communication Technology. IRICT 2017. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59426-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59427-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics