Abstract
The rough set theory is one of various methods that are frequently used by researchers in the analysis of complex data to solve different types of problems. Thus, a number of application software and methods have been proposed and published to make use of the benefits of the rough set theory. However, it is quite difficult for a non-rough set expert without any basic knowledge and information to understand and identify the best method or application software. Therefore, this paper proposes to assist the decision maker in selecting the best rough set-based application tool by analysing the capability of several rough set-based application tools in making good decisions. Four rough set-based application tools were selected to deal with the classification problem in the experimental tasks. The tools were ROSE2, 4eMKa2, JAMM and jMAF. The experimental results showed that JAMM, ROSE2 and jMAF returned quite significant results in the classification process. However, the 4eMKA2 performed well in comparison to the other selected software. The validation results of the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and neural network (NN) also indirectly proved that the dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA) is one of the best approaches to be used in decision-making processes, especially in the classification process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Karami, J., Ali Mohammadi, A., Seifouri, T.: Water quality analysis using a variable consistency dominance-based rough set approach. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 43, 25–33 (2014)
Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 56–66 (2013)
Qiang, J., Dan, W., Wang, D., Xiao, Z., Chen, H.: Multi-criteria outranking approach with hesitant fuzzy sets. OR Spectr. 36(4), 1001–1019 (2014)
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Sowinski, R.: Interactive evolutionary multi objective optimization using dominance-based rough set approach. IEEE (2010)
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E.K.: Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications two decades’ review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(8), 4126–4148 (2015)
Li, H., Li, D., Zhai, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, J.: A novel attribute reduction approach for multi-label data based on rough set theory. Inf. Sci. 367–368, 827–847 (2016)
Azar, A.T., Inbarani, H.H., Renuga Devi, K.: Improved dominance rough set-based classification system. Neural Comput. Appl. 343, 41–65 (2016)
Chen, D., Yang, Y., Dong, Z.: An incremental algorithm for attribute reduction with variable precision rough sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 45, 129–149 (2016)
Ali, R., Siddiqi, M.H., Lee, S.: Rough set-based approaches for discretization: a compact review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 44, 235–263 (2015)
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Sowiski, R.: Dominance-based rough set approach to decision under uncertainty and time preference. Ann. Oper. Res. 176(1), 41–75 (2010)
Pawlak, Z.: Rough set theory and its applications. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. 29, 7–10 (1998)
Meng, Z., Shi, Z.: On quick attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Inf. Sci. 330, 226–244 (2016)
Paolotti, L., Greco, S., Boggia, A.: Multi objective strategies for farms, using the dominance-based rough set approach. Aestimum 65, 95–115 (2014). Firenze University Press
Greco, S.: Multicriteria classification by dominance-based rough set approach. In: Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 1–14 (2002)
Inuiguchi, M., Yoshioka, Y., Kusunoki, Y.: Variable-precision dominance-based rough set approach and attribute reduction. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 50, 1199–1214 (2009)
Kadziski, M.: R.S., Greco, S.: Multiple criteria ranking and choice with all compatible minimal cover sets of decision rules. Knowl. Based Syst. 89, 569–583 (2015)
Szelag, M., Greco, S., Sowiski, R.: Variable consistency dominance-based rough set approach to preference learning in multicriteria ranking. Inf. Sci. 277, 525–552 (2014)
Weng, C.H., Huang, T.C.K., Han, R.P.: Disease prediction with different types of neural network classifiers. Telematics Inform. 2, 277–292 (2016)
Lam, H.K., Ekong, U.L., Xiao, H., Araujo, B., Ling, H., Chan, S.H., Yan, K.: A study of neural-network-based classifiers for material classification. Neurocomputing 144, 367–377 (2014)
Masetic, Z., Subasi, A.: Congestive heart failure detection using random forest classifier. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 130, 54–64 (2016)
Patel, R.K., Giri, V.: Feature selection and classification of mechanical fault of an induction motor using random forest classifier. Perspect. Sci. 8, 334–337 (2016)
Zhang, T., Xia, D., Tang, H., Yang, X., Li, H.: Classification of steel samples by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and random forest. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 157, 196–201 (2016)
Hashem, E.M., Mabrouk, M.S.: A study of support vector machine algorithm for liver disease diagnosis. Am. J. Intell. Syst. 4(1), 9–14 (2014)
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) under Research University Grant Vot-02G31 and Vot-15H17 and Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE) under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS Vot-4F551) for the completion of the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mohamad, M., Selamat, A. (2018). An Analysis of Rough Set-Based Application Tools in the Decision-Making Process. In: Saeed, F., Gazem, N., Patnaik, S., Saed Balaid, A., Mohammed, F. (eds) Recent Trends in Information and Communication Technology. IRICT 2017. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59426-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59427-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)