Skip to main content

College Students’ Computer Self-efficacy, Intrinsic Motivation, Attitude, and Satisfaction in Blended Learning Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blended Learning. New Challenges and Innovative Practices (ICBL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10309))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between students’ computer self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, attitude, and satisfaction in blended learning environments. The participants were 239 college students enrolled at Hubei University in China. A survey including four existing instruments was used for data collection. The results of structural equation modeling analysis suggested students’ attitudes toward online and face-to-face classes were the most influential toward to satisfaction in blended learning environments. Higher levels of intrinsic motivation were seen to be influential toward satisfaction in blended learning environments. Computer self-efficacy was seen to influence intrinsic motivation and attitudes, but not found to influence satisfaction in blended learning environments.

The rights of this work are transferred to the extent transferable according to title 17 § 105 U.S.C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Garrison, D.R., Kanuka, H.: Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 2, 95–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh, H.: Building effective blended learning programs. Educ. Technol. 43(6), 51–54 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Osguthorpe, R.T., Graham, C.R.: Blending learning environments: definitions and directions. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 3, 227–233 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, H., Wang, S.: Cases on Online Learning Communities and Beyond: Investigations and Applications. Information Science Reference/IGI Global, Hershey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, H., Wang, S.: Cases on e-Learning Management: Development and Implementation. Information Science Reference/IGI Global, Hershey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. So, H.J., Brush, T.A.: Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Comput. Educ. 51, 318–336 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrantes, J.L., Seabra, C., Lages, L.F.: Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. J. Bus. Res. 60, 960–964 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, J.H., Tennyson, R.D., Hsia, T.L.: A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Comput. Educ. 1, 155–164 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. Plenum, New York (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psych. 25, 54–67 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chao, C.Y., Chen, Y.T., Chuang, K.Y.: Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: a study in high school engineering education. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 4, 514–526 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A.: Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 19, 189–211 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim, C.K.: Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. Am. J. Distance Educ. 2, 41–51 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holley, D., Oliver, M.: Student engagement and blended learning: portraits of risk. Comput. Educ. 3, 693–700 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, Y., Zhou, T., Wang, B.: Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 1, 29–39 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Teo, T.: Assessing the computer attitudes of students: an Asian perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 4, 1634–1642 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell, A., Honore, S.: Criteria for successful blended learning. Indust. Commer. Train. 3, 143–149 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dahalan, N., Hassan, H., Atan, H.: Student engagement in online learning: learners attitude toward e-mentoring. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 67, 464–475 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pintrich, P.R., De Groot, E.V.: Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J. Educ. Psych. 1, 33–40 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akkoyunlu, B., Yılmaz-Soylu, M.: Development of a scale on learners’ views on blended learning and its implementation process. Internet High. Educ. 1, 26–32 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bentler, P.M., Chou, C.P.: Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol. Methods Res. 16(1), 78–117 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun. Infor. Syst. 5, 91–109 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, pp. 298–336. Erlbaum, New Jersey (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shevlin, M., Miles, J.N.: Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 1, 85–90 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fornell, C.D., Larcker, F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. J. Marketing Res. 2, 39–50 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A.S.: Regression Analysis by Example. Wiley, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Key Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research, Ministry of Education of China (14JZD044).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harrison Hao Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, Y., Yang, H.H., Cai, J., MacLeod, J. (2017). College Students’ Computer Self-efficacy, Intrinsic Motivation, Attitude, and Satisfaction in Blended Learning Environments. In: Cheung, S., Kwok, Lf., Ma, W., Lee, LK., Yang, H. (eds) Blended Learning. New Challenges and Innovative Practices. ICBL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10309. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59359-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59360-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics