Skip to main content

Is Innovation a Determinant for SME Performance? Cross-Country Analysis of the Economies of Former USSR Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies

Abstract

Strong and dynamic SME is crucial to economic growth, with firms making new investments, creating jobs, and triggering economic growth. Entrepreneurial activity and economic opportunities for small businesses in former USSR countries changed significantly following the transition to market economies. However, it requires SME in the former USSR economies to engage in innovation activity to maintain profitability and grow while coping with country-associated challenges such as informal competition and corruption. This research aims to investigate the impact of engaging in innovation activity on company growth among SMEs in former USSR countries and its magnitude in relevance to the country-specific environment and factors associated with it. The analysis includes the examination of firm-level indicators of innovation activity alongside the country-level statistics (such as taxation, ease of doing business, corruption, and other barriers) across selected countries. The latest available World Bank Entrepreneurship Database and World Bank Enterprise Survey (2012–2013) data were used to feature the determinants of high-growth SMEs. Strategic implications of the findings for policy makers are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agyapong, D. (2010). Micro, small and medium enterprises’ activities, income level and poverty reduction in Ghana – A synthesis of related literature. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L., & Tovato, G. (2002). The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms: The role of the availability of external finance. Small Business Economics, 19(4), 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camisón-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., Segarra-Ciprés, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, M. N., & Chakraharti, A. K. (1985). Innovation and productivity in U.S. industry (Brookins Papers on Economic Activity, 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschryvere, M. (2014). R&D, firm growth and the role of innovation persistence: An analysis of Finnish SMEs and large firms. Small Business Economics, 43(14), 767–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezhina, I. G., & Saltykov, B. G. (2005). Formation of the Russian national innovation system and development of small business. Problems of Forecasting, 2(1), 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, S. A. W. (1997). From knowledge to action: The impact of benchmarking on organizational performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 795–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2006). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P., Machin, S., & Van Reenen, J. (1993). The profitability of innovating firms. Rand Journal of Economics, 24(2), 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review Economic Policy, 22(4), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Ireland, R. D., & Harrison, J. S. (1991). Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 93–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriakose, S. (2013). Fostering entrepreneurship in Georgia (No. 80673) (pp. 1–100). The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/01/18147170/fostering-entrepreneurship-georgia

  • Lee, K., & Kang, S. M. (2007). Innovation types and productivity growth: Evidence from Korean manufacturing SMEs. Global Economic Review, 36, 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1111–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhamad, N., & Kiminami, A. (2011). Innovation, cooperation and business performance. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 1(1), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, M. L., Schiantarelli, F., & Sembenelli, A. (2006). Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy. European Economic Review, 50, 2037–2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance – A comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 218–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W., & Amit, R. (2003). The dynamics of innovative activity and competitive advantage: The case of Australian retail banking, 1981 to 1995. Organization Science, 14(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., & Tybout, J. (1999). An empirical model of sunk cost and the decision to export (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1436). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovyev, V. P. (2006). Competition in conditions of the innovation model of development of the economy. Kiev: Feniks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanya, M. H. B. (2010). Auto SMEs in Bangalore: Does innovation promote employment and labour productivity? Economic and Political Weekly, 45(11), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Intellectual Property Organization. (2014). Recommendations for strengthening the role of SMEs in countries of CIS. Geneva: WIPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, T. (2005). Firm growth, size, age and behaviour in Japanese manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 24(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nejdet Delener .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Delener, N., Farooq, O., Bakhadirov, M. (2017). Is Innovation a Determinant for SME Performance? Cross-Country Analysis of the Economies of Former USSR Countries. In: Sauka, A., Chepurenko, A. (eds) Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57342-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics