Skip to main content

Evapotranspiration of Wheat in a Hilly Topography: Results from Measurements Using a Set of Eddy Covariance Stations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water and Land Security in Drylands

Abstract

Several methods allow the determination of evapotranspiration (ET), either by direct measurement or by estimation from weather data. The most used estimation method is the FAO56 (FAO-PM), based on the concept of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and crop coefficient (Kc). The eddy covariance technique (EC) developed for measurement of convective fluxes between land surface and the atmosphere is commonly used to estimate ET. However, these methods were established under standard conditions in flat terrain, and their use in hilly areas is questionable. In this work, the variability of ETo and ET measured by EC and energy balance (EB) in a hilly area of northern Tunisia is studied for different relief configurations. The experiment was conducted using a meteorological (M), and three EC-EB measurement stations in three wheat fields. Two stations were installed on opposite slopes of a ridge with apposing aspects and moderate slopes (A, B), and one station was installed in a flat site (C). Results of monitoring during the mid-season of wheat growth showed similar ETo levels in all sites for hourly and daily time steps with relative RMSE in the range 0.03–0.08 compared to M. Average ET values in sloping fields (A, B) were, respectively, 15% and 10% lower than in (C). However, hourly values of ET/ETo obtained from EC measurements were smaller than FAO-Kc, contrarily to those based on the EB method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

EB:

Energy Balance

EC:

Eddy covariance

ET:

Evapotranspiration

ET_EC:

Evapotranspiration estimated by Eddy covariance technique

ET_EB:

Evapotranspiration estimated by Energy Balance equation

ETo:

Reference evapotranspiration

FAO-56:

Food and Agriculture organization, paper 56

FAO-Kc:

Kc recommended by FAO-56 bulletin, Table 12

FAO-PM:

FAO Penman–Monteith equation

G:

Soil heat flux

H:

Sensible heat flux

ITC:

The integral turbulence characteristics test

Kc:

Crop coefficient

LAI:

Leaf Area Index

LE:

Latent heat flux

Min:

Minute

Rn:

Net radiation

ST:

The steady-state test

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, pp 465

    Google Scholar 

  • Evett SR, Schwartz, RC, Howell TA, Baumhardt RL, Copeland KS (2012a) Can weighing lysimeter ET represent surrounding field ET well enough to test flux station measurements of daily and sub-daily ET? Adv Water Resour 50:(79–90)

    Google Scholar 

  • Evett SR, Kustas, WP, Gowda, PH, Anderson, MC, Prueger, JH, Howell, TA (2012b) Overview of the bushland evapotranspiration and agricultural remote sensing EXperiment 2008 (BEAREX08): A field experiment evaluating methods for quantifying ET at multiple scales. Adv Water Resour 50:(5–19)

    Google Scholar 

  • Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson, RJ, Anthoni P, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Dolman H, Granier A, Gross P, Gru¨nwald T, Hollinger D, Jensen N-O, Katul G, Keronen P, Kowalski A, Ta Lai C, Law BE, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Moors E, Munger JW, Pilegaard K, Rannik U, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Tenhunen J, Tu K, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001) Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. J Agric Meteorol 107:(43–69)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenwinter C, Bernhofer C, Eichelmann U (2008) Comparison of horizontal and vertical advective CO2 fluxes at three forest sites. Agric Meteorol 148:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foken T, Wishura B (1996) Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements. J Agric Meteorol 78:83–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerle A et al (2007) Eddy covariance measurements of carbon dioxide, latent and sensible energy fluxes above a meadow on a mountain slope. Bound-Layer Meteorol 122:397–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holst T, Rost J, Mayer H (2005) Net radiation balance for two forested slopes on opposite sides of a valley. Int J Biometeorol 49:275–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo AG, Enrique R, Colin Cikoski C, Bruce J, Rafael L, Erkan I (2013) On the observed ecohydrologic dynamics of a semiarid basin with aspect-delimited ecosystems. Water Resour Res 49:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Ferrara RM, Martinelli N, Personnic P, Cellier P (2007) Estimating energy fluxes from sloping crops using standard agrometeorological measurements and topography. Agric Meteorol 146:116–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ (1997) The influence of topography on meteorological variables and surface-atmosphere interactions. J Hydrol 190:182–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebmann C, Göckede M, Foken T, Aubinet M, Aurela M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Buchmann N, Carrara A, Cescatti A, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Elbers JA, Granier A, Grünwald T, Guyon D, Havránková K, Heinesch B, Knohl A, Laurila T, Longdoz B, Marcolla B, Markkanen T, Miglietta F, Moncrieff J, Montagnani L, Moors E, Nardino M, Ourcival JM, Rambal S, Rannik U, Rotenberg E, Sedlak P, Unterhuber G, Vesala T, Yakir D (2005) Quality analysis applied on eddy covariance measurements at complex forest sites using footprint modelling. Theor Appl Climatol 80(2–4):121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tromp-van-Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ (2006) On the interrelations between topography, soil depth, soilmoisture, transpiration rates and species distribution at the hillslope scale. Adv Water Resour 29:293–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twine TE, Kutas WP, Norman JM, Cook DR, Houser PR, Prueger JH, Starks PJ, Wesley ML (2000) Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland. Agric Meteorol 103:279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van-Dijk A, Moene AF, DeBruin HAR (2004) The principles of surface flux physics; theory, practice and description of the ECPACK library. In: Meteorology and Air Quality Group. Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support of ANR and AIRD for a Phd grant to the first author is acknowledged. Authors want to thank the editorial board and Dr Steven R. Evett for reviewing the paper and for his pertinent comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to N. Boudhina or Mohamed Moncef Masmoudi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boudhina, N. et al. (2017). Evapotranspiration of Wheat in a Hilly Topography: Results from Measurements Using a Set of Eddy Covariance Stations. In: Ouessar, M., Gabriels, D., Tsunekawa, A., Evett, S. (eds) Water and Land Security in Drylands. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54021-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics