Skip to main content

Biology and Cybercrime: Towards a Genetic-Social, Predictive Model of Cyber Violence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Cybercrime

Abstract

In what follows, an updated version of Owen’s (2014) Genetic-Social, meta-theoretical framework which has been employed in over 20 publications is briefly outlined and certain meta-constructs are ‘applied’ to the study of online violence. On 24 September 2015, the International Telecommunications Union, an agency of the United Nations, published a report on ‘Cyber Violence Against Women and Girls: A World-Wide Wake-Up Call’. The report, which at the time of writing (November 2015) has been formally retracted, appeared to define ‘cyber violence’ in terms of ‘online trolling’ and ‘online hate-speech’ targeted at women and girls. It is contended here that we need to conceptualise ‘cyber violence’ in broader terms. Cyber violence can be regarded as behaviour by an actor which takes place online and which is hostile and aggressive, and which may also be offensive, indecent, obscene or of a menacing character. The victims can be of any background with regard to age, gender, ethnicity, sexuality or social class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anholt, R.R.H., & Mackay, T.F.C. (2012). Genetics of aggression. Annual Review of Genetics, 46, 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J. (2014). The dark net. London: Windmill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J. (2015). The dark net: Inside the Digital Underworld. London: Windmill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.B., et al. (1992). Behavioural endocrinology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. (2013). The effect of de-individuation of the internet troller on criminal procedure implementation: An interview with a hater. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(1), 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2013). Virtual criminology. In E. McLaughlin & E. Muncie (Eds.), The sage dictionary of criminology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckels, E., Trapnell, P.D., & Paulhus, D.L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67(9), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1981). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D., et al. (2007). Neuroscience and philosophy: Brain, mind and language. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman, D. (2011). The brain on trial. The Atlantic, July/August 2011, p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filley, C.M., et al. (2001). Towards an understanding of violence: Neurobehavioural aspects of unwarranted physical aggression: Aspen Neurobehavioural Conference Consensus Statement. Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology, 14, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980a). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980b). The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese, J., et al. (2003). The potential relevances of biology to social inquiry. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh, revised by Dennis J. Schmidt. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Telecommunications Union. (2015). Cyber Violence against Women and Girls. www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/images/wsis/GenderReport2015FINAL.pdf, Date Accessed 6th January 2016 (online).

  • Lyotard, J.F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. (1997). The sickening mind: Brain, behaviour, immunity and disease. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2006). Genetic-social science and the study of human biotechnology. Current Sociology, 54(6), 897–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2007a) Culture of crime control: through a post-Foucauldian lens. The Internet Journal of Criminology. pp. 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2007b) After Postmodernism: Towards an Evolutionary Sociology. In: Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. Nova Science Publishers, pp. 153-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2009). Social theory and human biotechnology. With a Foreword by Professor Derek Layder [Univ. Leicester]. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2012). The biological and the social in criminological theory. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2014). Criminological theory: A genetic-social approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T., & Noble, W. (2015). Towards a genetic-social approach to conflict. Learning from Conflict national conference, Macron Stadium, Bolton, UK. 10 September 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T., & Owen, J.A. (2015). Virtual criminology: Insights from genetic-social science and Heidegger. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 7(1), 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbe-Grillet, A. (1963). For a new novel: Essays on fiction. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibeon, R. (2004). Rethinking social theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed, F.C. (2017, forthcoming). Cyber-grooming: How biological variables reinforce cognitive distortion. In T. Owen, W. Noble, & F.C. Speed (Eds.), New perspectives on cybercrime. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, D.R., et al. (2009). Disinhibition due to disruption of the orbitofrontal circuit treated successfully with carbamazepine: A case series. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 21(3), 323–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiihonen, J., et al. (2014). Genetic background of extreme violent behavior. Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 786–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N. (2014). A troublesome inheritance: Genes, race and history. London: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., & Beaver, K.M. (Eds.). (2009). Biosocial criminology: New directions in theory and research. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., & Ellis, L. (Eds.). (2003). Biosocial criminology: Challenging environmentalism’s supremacy. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Owen, T., Noble, W., Speed, F.C. (2017). Biology and Cybercrime: Towards a Genetic-Social, Predictive Model of Cyber Violence. In: New Perspectives on Cybercrime. Palgrave Studies in Cybercrime and Cybersecurity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53856-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53856-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53855-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53856-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics