Skip to main content

Ground Based Wireless Instrumentation and Real Time Monitoring of Pakhi Landslide, Garhwal Himalayas, Uttarakhand (India)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides (WLF 2017)

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Despite our increasing knowledge on the subject, the damage tolls due to landslides are on rise during monsoon in Indian Himalayan terrain. Therefore, the installation of a real-time monitoring system is often a cost-effective risk mitigation measure. A Landslide Observatory with wireless instrumentation for real time monitoring of ground deformation and hydrologic parameters has been established at Pakhi Landslide in Garhwal Himalayas, India. The measurement sensors include in-place inclinometers (IPI), piezometers, wire-line extensometers and an automatic weather station (AWS). The real time data is being monitored to establish warning thresholds. The annual cumulative rainfall during 2015 was 1388 mm with cumulative monsoon period (June to September 2015) rainfall of 825 mm. At the crown of landslide beyond main scarp, there is negligible displacement being the stable part. Within the main body of the landslide, it could be inferred that the colluvium, greatly weathered bedrock and their interface experience somehow greater extent of movement at different depths in comparison to the interface between greatly weathered bedrock and unweathered bedrock. A correlation between higher intensity rainfall events and displacement pattern across the inclinometer sensors is also witnessed. However, these inferences can only be established with further data analysis of later periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aleotti P (2004) A warning system for rainfall-induced shallow failures. Eng Geol 73(3–4):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeli MG, Gasparetto P, Menotti RM, Pasuto A, Silvano S (1994) A system of monitoring and warning in a complex landslide in northeastern Italy. Landslide News 8:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum RL, Godt JP, Harp EL, McKenna JW, McMullen SR (2005) Early warning of landslides for rail traffic between Seattle and Everett, Washington, USA. In: Proceedings of 2005 international conference on landslide risk management, A.A. Balkema, New York, pp 731–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti M, Genevois R, LaHusen RL, Simoni A, Tecca PR (2000) Debris flow monitoring in the Acquabona watershed on the Dolomites (Italian Alps). Phys Chem Earth Part B 26(9):707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien-Yuan C, Tien-Chien C, Fan-Chieh Y, Wen-Hui Y, Chun-Chieh T (2005) Rainfall duration and debris-flow initiated studies for real-time monitoring. Environ Geol 47:715–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chleborad AF, Baum RL, Godt JP (2006) Rainfall thresholds for forecasting landslides in the Seattle, Washington, Area—exceedance and probability. U.S. Geological survey open-file report 2006–1064

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnicliff J (1993) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay PJ, Fell R, Maguire PK (1997) The relationship between the probability of landslide occurrence and rainfall. Can Geotech J 34(6):811–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigerio S, Schenato L, Bossi G, Cavalli M, Crema S, Mantovani M, Marcato G, Pasuto A (2014) Landslide monitoring with an integrated platform: methodology, design and case study. Rend Online Soc Geol Ital 30:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Froese CR, Moreno F (2007) Turtle Mountain Field Laboratory (TMFL): Part 1—overview and activities. In: VR Schaefer, RL Schuster, AK Turner (eds) Conference presentations: 1st North American landslide conference, AEG Special Publication, vol 23. Vail, Colorado: Assoc. of Engineering Geologists, pp 971–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Husaini O, Ratnasamy M (2001) An early warning system for active landslides. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 34:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Pain A, Sharma S (2013a) Stability assessment of a potential debris slide in Garhwal Himalayas, India. Indian Landslides 6(2):9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Pain A, Sharma S (2013b) Finite element modeling approach to assess the stability of debris and rock slopes: a case study from the Indian Himalayas. Nat Hazards 69:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK, Wilson RC, Mark RK, Brabb EE, Brown WM, Ellen SD, Harp EL, Wieczorek GF, Alger CS, Zatkin RS (1987) Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall. Science 238(4829):921–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan MS (1982) Geology of India and Burma, 6th edn. CBS Publishers and Distributors, Delhi, p 536p

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen PE (1996) Field instrumentation. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Special report 247. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 278–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal SK, Singh M, Kapur P, Sharma BK, Shamshi MA (2008) Design and development of instrumentation network for landslide monitoring and issue an early warning. J Sci Ind Res 67:361–365

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA-USGS Debris Flow Task Force (2005) NOAAUSGS Debris-flowwarning system—final report. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1283

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortigao B, Justi MG (2004) Rio-Watch: the Rio de Janeiro landslide alarm system. Geotech News 22(3):28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid ME, LaHusen RL (1998) Real-time monitoring of active landsides along Highway 50, El Dorado County. California Geol 51(3):17–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid ME, Baum RL, LaHusen RG, Ellis WL, (2008) Landslides and engineered slopes. In: Chen et al. (eds) Taylor & Francis Group, London. ISBN 978-0-415-41196-7, pp 179–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J, Turek G, Clark M, Uddstrom M (2007) Real-time forecasting of shallow, rainfall-triggered landslides in New Zealand. Geophys Res Abs 9:5778

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC (2005) The rise and fall of debris-flow warning system for the San Francisco Bay region, California. In: Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide Hazard and risk. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 493–516

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to CSIR, New Delhi for supporting this work under 12th five-year plan and to Director, CSIR-CBRI, Roorkee for granting permission to publish this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debi Prasanna Kanungo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kanungo, D.P., Maletha, A.K., Singh, M., Sharma, N. (2017). Ground Based Wireless Instrumentation and Real Time Monitoring of Pakhi Landslide, Garhwal Himalayas, Uttarakhand (India). In: Mikoš, M., Arbanas, Ž., Yin, Y., Sassa, K. (eds) Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides. WLF 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53487-9_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics