Skip to main content

Media Convergence and the Network Society: Media Logic(s), Polymedia and the Transition of the Public Sphere

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media Convergence and Deconvergence

Abstract

In this chapter it is argued that the phenomena which used to be described as convergence have started to reach a level of complexity which can no longer be embraced by the convergence concepts alone. For one, convergence as a term implies a transition process, which for many new social media platforms does not seem to be applicable anymore: they are already polymediated by nature. Consequently, the chapter links the idea of media convergence to a concept, which specifically focuses on the role of technology and its embeddedness in interpersonal and institutional contexts: the concept of “media logic.” To offer an applicable approach for media logic, which opens up the field for empirical research, the concept of “media grammar” is introduced. To demonstrate how media logic and the connected concept of media grammar play out in society, the notion of the digital public sphere is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media logic, social control, and fear. Communication Theory, 23(3), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, D., & Snow, R. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1992). Media logic and culture: reply to oakes. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 5(3), 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arango-Forero, G., Roncallo-Dow, S., & Uribe-Jongbloed, E. (2016). Rethinking convergence: A new world to describe an old idea. In A. Lugmayr & C. Dal Zotto (Eds.), Media Convergence Handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 17–26)., Journalism, Broadcast and Social Media Aspects of Convergence New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bächle, T. C., & Thimm, C. (Eds.) (2014). Mobile Medien—Mobiles Leben. Neue Technologien, Mobilität und die mediatisierte Gesellschaft. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baym, N. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Chichester: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2004). Expanding dialogue: The internet, the public sphere, and prospects for transnational democracy. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 131–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breese, E. B. (2011). Mapping the variety of public spheres. Communication Theory, 21(2), 130–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2005). The network society: From knowledge to policy. In M. Castells & G. Cardoso (Eds.), The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy (pp. 3–21). Washington, D.C.: John Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: global civil society, Communication networks, and global governance(s). Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chayko, M. (2008). Portable communities. The social dynamics of online and mobile connectedness. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. S., (2011). Political activities on the Internet: slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16, 2–7 Retrieved from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3336/2767.

  • Couldry, N. (2014). Media logic revisited. In A. Hepp & F. Krotz (Eds.), Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions. Arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, L. (2007). The internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 3(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 5(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einspänner-Pflock, J., Anastasiadis, M., & Thimm, C. (2015). Ad hoc mini-publics on Twitter: Citizen participation or political communication? Examples from the German National Election 2013. In A. Frame & G. Brachotte (Eds.), Forms and Functions of Political Participation in a Digital World (pp. 52–59). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einspänner-Pflock, J., Dang-Anh, M., & Thimm, C. (Eds.) (2014). Digitale Gesellschaft—Partizipationskulturen im Netz. Berlin: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E., & Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics and Society, 34(2), 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31(3), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305115603080.

  • Hepp, A. (2011). Medienkultur. Die Kultur mediatisierter Welten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society. Nordicom review, 29(2), 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, C. (2012). Technologies as institutions: Rethinking the role of technology in media governance constellations. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects, intellect (pp. 117–138). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2014). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media Society, 17(8), 1241–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of mediatization as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2009). Mediatization: concept. Changes, Consequences, New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Media studies’ fascination with the concept of the public sphere: Critical reflections and emerging debates. Media, Culture and Society, 35(1), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montpetit, M.-J. (2016). The 2nd Convergence: A technology viewpoint. In A. Lugmayr & C. Dal Zotto (Eds.), Media convergence handbook, Vol. 1: Journalism, broadcast and social media aspects of convergence (pp. 29–58). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McLean, R. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. M. (2014). Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory, 24(3), 340–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhytms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, V. (2016). How does social media shape media convergence? The case of journalists covering war and conflict. In A. Lugmayr, C. Dal Zotto, (Eds.), Media convergence handbook, Vol. 1.: Journalism, broadcast and social media aspects of convergence. New York: Springer (pp. 363–87). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, A., & Keller, Bill. (2011). Open secrets: WikiLeaks, war and American diplomacy. New York: The New York Times Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, C. (2012). Automate this. How algorithms came to rule our world. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömböck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press/Politics, 2008(13), 26–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimm, C. (2004). Mediale Ubiquität und soziale Kommunikation. In U. Thiedecke (Ed.), Soziologie des cyperspace. Medien, strukturen und semantiken (pp. 51–69). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimm, C. (2015). The mediatization of politics and the digital public sphere: Participatory dynamics in mini-publics. In A. Frame & G. Brachotte (Eds.), Forms and Functions of Political Participation in a Digital World (pp. 167–183). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimm, C. (2017, forthcoming): Media technology and media logic(s)—Introducing Media Grammar. In C. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis, & J. Einspänner (Eds.), Media logic(s) revisited: Modelling the interplay between media institutions, media technology and societal change. Basingstoke: Palgave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimm, C., Anastasiadis, M. & Einspänner-Pflock, J. (Eds.) (2017, forthcoming). Media logics revisited. Basingstoke: Palgave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimm, C., Dang-Anh, M., & Einspänner, J. (2011). Diskurssystem Twitter: Semiotische und handlungstheoretische Perspektiven. In M. Anastasiadis & C. Thimm (Eds.), Social Media: Theorie und Praxis digitaler Sozialität (pp. 265–286). Frankfurt/New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimm, C., Dang-Anh, M., & Einspänner, J. (2014). Mediatized politics—structures and strategies of discursive participation and online deliberation on Twitter. In F. Krotz & A. Hepp (Eds.), Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age (pp. 253–269). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thimm, C., Einspänner, J. & Dang-Anh, M. (2012). Politische deliberation online. Twitter als Element des politischen Diskurses. In A. Hepp & F. Krotz. (Eds.), Mediatisierte Welten: Beschreibungsansätze und Forschungsfelder (pp. 283–307). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from tahrir square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uricchio, W. (2011). The algorithmic turn: Photosynth, augmented reality and the changing implications of the image. Visual Studies, 26(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villi, M., Matikainen, J., & Khaldarova, I. (2016). Recommend, tweet, share: User-distributed content (UCD) and the convergence of news and social networks. In A. Lugmayr & C. Dal Zotto (Eds.), Media convergence handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 289–306)., Journalism, Broadcast and Social Media Aspects of Convergence New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Ksiazek, T. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caja Thimm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thimm, C. (2017). Media Convergence and the Network Society: Media Logic(s), Polymedia and the Transition of the Public Sphere. In: Sparviero, S., Peil, C., Balbi, G. (eds) Media Convergence and Deconvergence. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51289-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics