Skip to main content

Human Flourishing and Human Morphogenesis: A Critical Realist Interpretation and Critique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Morphogenesis and Human Flourishing

Part of the book series: Social Morphogenesis ((SOCMOR))

Abstract

Critical Realists have long argued that social science has an axiological concern with “human flourishing.” But they have rarely spelt out what they mean by this term. It is urgent that they do so, in order to respond effectively to the post-humanist movement’s appropriation of the flourishing concept. This article sketches a theory of human flourishing that is: (1) rooted in the Aristotelian tradition that underlies most versions of CR; (2) compatible with central tenets of CR such as “emergence”, “ontological stratification”, “actualism” and “transcendence”; and (3) allows for a critical assessment of the posthumanist vision. The conclusion reflects on the implications of human morphogenesis for social morphogenesis and social theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This premise is explored in at least two science fiction movies: “The Matrix” and “Vanilla Sky.”

  2. 2.

    In a subsequent book, Smith argues that human beings have six basic needs related to: “body”, “knowledge”, “integrity”, “agency”, “morality” and “sociality.” However, these are inductively derived from existing research on human well-being and are not systematically grounded in his account of human personhood. See (Smith 2015).

  3. 3.

    Note that this is quite similar to Martha Nussbaum’s distinction between (real) “capacities” and (actualized) “functions” (Nussbaum 2011).

  4. 4.

    For a similar view from a pragmatist standpoint, see also (Joas 2000).

References

  • Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2010). Routine, reflexivity, and realism*. Sociological Theory, 28(3), 272–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1982). The politics (T. J. Saunders & T. A. Sinclair, Eds.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1996). The politics and the constitution of Athens (S. Everson, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2000). Nichomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). The science of evil: On empathy and the origins of cruelty. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2000). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/yale/Doc?id=2001956

  • Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1994). Plato etc.: The problems of philosophy and their resolution. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (2000). From east to west: Odyssey of a soul. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (2002). Meta-reality: The philosophy of meta-reality. New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2008). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1933). The division of labor in society. New York/London: Free Press/Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1958). Professional ethics and civic morals. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (2001). The elementary forms of religious life, trans. Carol Closman, abridged with an intro. and notes by Mark S. Cladis. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C. (2003). Humanity 2.0. Wilson Quarterly, 27(4), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (2001). Natural goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life: Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. J. (2012). The politics of transhumanism and the techno-millennial imagination 1626–2030. Zygon, 47(4), 757–776. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01289.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., & Gregor, M. J. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klare, M. (2001). Resource wars: The new landscape of global conflict. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (1989). Aristotle on the human good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2007). What is good and why: The ethics of well-being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lear, J. (1988). Aristotle: The desire to understand. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, D. (2010). The transhuman security dilemma. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 21(2), 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, G. (2000). Biological response to stress: Implications for animal welfare. In The biology of animal stress: Basic principles and implications for animal welfare (pp. 1–21). Wallingford: CABI Publication.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (2008). Thus spoke Zarathustra (R. Pippin, Ed., A. D. Caro, Trans.) New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1997). Complete works (J. M. Cooper & D. Hutchinson, Eds.). Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (2nd Beacon Paperback, Ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, A., & Branden, N. (1965). The virtue of selfishness. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism (Expanded, Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and interpretation (pp. 20–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, O. (1998). The man who mistook his wife for a hat: And other clinical tales. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2010). What is a person?: Rethinking humanity, social life, and the moral good from the person up. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2015). To flourish or destruct. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, F. (2004). Posthumanism, or the cultural logic of global neo-capitalism. Complexitiés du posthumanisme: Pour une critique de la bio-économiquepolitique, 24–25, 55–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, F. (2014). What’s critical about critical realism? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. (2002). God, Locke, and equality: Christian foundations in Locke’s political thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Gorski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gorski, P. (2017). Human Flourishing and Human Morphogenesis: A Critical Realist Interpretation and Critique. In: Archer, M. (eds) Morphogenesis and Human Flourishing. Social Morphogenesis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49469-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49469-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49468-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49469-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics