Abstract
This article discusses Michael Porter’s paradigm of creating shared value (CSV) based on the criticism of corporate social responsibility by Milton Friedman in the perspective of contemporary debates on legitimacy and good corporate citizenship. This is a development of the argument presented by Jacob Dahl Rendtorff concerning the liberal property rights paradigm of business ethics in his book Responsibility, Ethics and Legitimacy of Corporations (Responsibility, ethics and legitimacy of corporations. Copenhagen Business School Press, 2009). This article discusses the work that Michael Porter has developed together with Mark Kramer, which can be presented as a strategic approach to business ethics and corporate social responsibility. This work began with Porter’s concept of Strategic Philanthropy (The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Reprinted In: Harvard Business School Press (ed) Harvard business review on corporate social responsibility, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003) which became Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92, 2006) and gradually developed into the concept of Creating Shared Value (Harv Bus Rev 89(1):62–77, 2011). We see how Michael Porter integrates the critical perspective on CSR from Friedman in a strategic concept of philanthropy, corporate social responsibility and creating shared value (CSV). Accordingly, the concept of creating shared value should be considered as a development of the ideas of strategic philanthropy and corporate social responsibility in the perspective of capitalism and freedom. At the same time, however, the concept of creating shared value is broader and more oriented towards society and towards the idea of profit-based CSR since it integrates the values of society and business in corporate legitimacy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The sections in this article “Milton Friedman’s concept of Corporate Social Responsibility” and “Michael Porter’s interpretation of Friedman’s concept of Corporate Social Responsibility as strategic philanthropy and creating shared value (CSV)” are partly slightly modified and updated versions of the pages on “the liberal property right of business” in the book Responsibility, Ethics and Legitimacy of Corporations (Rendtorff 2009: 91ff.). I am grateful to Copenhagen Business School Press for allowing me to use this material.
References
Aras, Güler, and David Crowther. 2009. Global perspectives on corporate governance and CSR. Farnham: Gower Publishing.
Boatright, J.R. 1999. Does business ethics rest on a mistake? Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 583–591.
———. 2003. Ethics and the conduct of business. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob D. Rendtorff. 2014. La théorie des parties prenantes. Paris: Editions La Découverte.
Carson, Thomas. 1993. Friedman’s theory of corporate social responsibility. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 12(1): 3–32.
Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16): 386–405.
Crane, Andrew, Guido Palazzo, Laura J. Spence, and Dirk Matten. 2014. Contesting the value of creating shared value. California Management Review 56(2): 130–153.
Desjardins, Joseph R. 2014. An introduction to business ethics. New York: McGraw Hill.
Etzioni, Amatya. 1988. The moral dimension. Towards a new economics. New York: The Free Press.
Freeman, R.E. 1984/2010. Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1996. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. (1970) Reprinted In Beyond integrity. A Judeo-Christian approach to business ethics, ed. Scott B. Rae and Kenman L. Wong, 241–246. Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
Ims, K.J., and L.J.T. Pedersen. 2015. Business and the greater good. Rethinking business ethics in the age of crisis. Studies in transatlantic business ethics. Cheltenham/Northmaton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.
Jensen, Inger, John D. Scheuer, and Jacob D. Rendtorff. 2013. The balanced company: Organizing for the 21st century. Farnham: Gower Publishing.
Paine, L.S. 1994a. Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review 72(2): 106–117.
———. 1994b. Law, ethics and managerial judgment. The Journal of Legal Studies Education 12(2): 153–169.
Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
———. 1987. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review 65(3): 43–59.
———. 2008. The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review 86(1): 79–93.
Porter M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2003. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Reprinted In Harvard business review on corporate social responsibility, ed. Havard Business School Press. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and society: The link between competitive Advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84(12): 78–92.
———. 2011. Creating shared value. How to reinvent Capitalism – And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review 89(1): 62–77.
Phillips, R.A., and R.E. Freeman. 2010. Stakeholders. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rendtorff, J.D. 2009. Responsibility, ethics and legitimacy of corporations. Koge/Portland/Abingdon: Copenhagen Business School Press.
———. 2010. Power and principle in the market place, on ethics and economics. London: Ashgate.
———. 2011a. Institutionalization of corporate ethics and social responsibility programs in firms. In Corporate social and human rights responsibilities: Global, legal and management perspectives, ed. Karin Buhmann, Lynn Roseberry, and Mette Morsing, 244–266. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2011b. Corporate citizenship as organizational integrity. In Corporate citizenship and new governance: The political role of corporations, ed. Ingo Pies, and Peter Koslowski, 59–91. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.
———. 2013. Philosophical theories of management and corporations. In Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics, ed. Christoph Luetge, 1409–1432. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer Science+Business Media.
———. 2014. French philosophy and social theory: A perspective for ethics and philosophy of management. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer Science+Business Media.
———. 2015. Business ethics, strategy, and organizational integrity: The importance of integrity as a basic principle of business ethics that contributes to better economic performance. In Handbook of research on business ethics and corporate responsibilities, ed. D.E. Palmer, 91–105. Herschey: IGI global.
Suchman, M.C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review 20(3): 571–610.
Velasquez, M.G. 2002. Business ethics. Concepts and cases. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.
———. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
———. 1996. The mechanisms of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rendtorff, J.D. (2017). Creating Shared Value as Institutionalization of Ethical Responsibilities of the Business Corporation as a Good Corporate Citizen in Society. In: Wieland, J. (eds) Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism. Ethical Economy, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48802-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48802-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48801-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48802-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)