Skip to main content

Optimized Connected Components Labeling with Pixel Prediction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems (ACIVS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 10016))

Abstract

In this paper we propose a new paradigm for connected components labeling, which employs a general approach to minimize the number of memory accesses, by exploiting the information provided by already seen pixels, removing the need to check them again. The scan phase of our proposed algorithm is ruled by a forest of decision trees connected into a single graph. Every tree derives from a reduction of the complete optimal decision tree. Experimental results demonstrated that on low density images our method is slightly faster than the fastest conventional labeling algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agam, G., Argamon, S., Frieder, O., Grossman, D., Lewis, D.: The Complex Document Image Processing (CDIP) Test Collection Project. Illinois Institute of Technology (2006). http://ir.iit.edu/projects/CDIP.html

  2. Baltieri, D., Vezzani, R., Cucchiara, R.: 3DPeS: 3D people dataset for surveillance and forensics. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Joint ACM Workshop on Human Gesture and Behavior Understanding, pp. 59–64. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, F., Chen, C.J., Lu, C.J.: A linear-time component-labeling algorithm using contour tracing technique. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 93(2), 206–220 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, W.Y., Chiu, C.C., Yang, J.H.: Block-based connected-component labeling algorithm using binary decision trees. Sensors 15(9), 23763–23787 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Stefano, L., Bulgarelli, A.: A simple and efficient connected components labeling algorithm. In: International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, pp. 322–327. IEEE (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grana, C., Bolelli, F., Baraldi, L., Vezzani, R.: YACCLAB - Yet another connected components labeling benchmark. In: 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grana, C., Borghesani, D., Cucchiara, R.: Optimized block-based connected components labeling with decision trees. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 19(6), 1596–1609 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Grana, C., Montangero, M., Borghesani, D.: Optimal decision trees for local image processing algorithms. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 33(16), 2302–2310 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He, L., Chao, Y., Suzuki, K.: A run-based two-scan labeling algorithm. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17(5), 749–756 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. He, L., Zhao, X., Chao, Y., Suzuki, K.: Configuration-transition-based connected-component labeling. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(2), 943–951 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Huiskes, M.J., Lew, M.S.: The MIR flickr retrieval evaluation. In: MIR 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval. ACM, New York (2008). http://press.liacs.nl/mirflickr/

  12. Lacassagne, L., Zavidovique, B.: Light speed labeling: efficient connected component labeling on RISC architectures. J. Real-Time Image Process. 6(2), 117–135 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis, D., Agam, G., Argamon, S., Frieder, O., Grossman, D., Heard, J.: Building a test collection for complex document information processing. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 665–666. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. The Legacy Tobacco Document Library (LTDL). University of California, San Francisco (2007). http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/

  15. Wu, K., Otoo, E., Suzuki, K.: Two strategies to speed up connected component labeling algorithms. Technical report LBNL-59102, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, K., Otoo, E., Suzuki, K.: Optimizing two-pass connected-component labeling algorithms. Pattern Anal. Appl. 12(2), 117–135 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Costantino Grana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grana, C., Baraldi, L., Bolelli, F. (2016). Optimized Connected Components Labeling with Pixel Prediction. In: Blanc-Talon, J., Distante, C., Philips, W., Popescu, D., Scheunders, P. (eds) Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems. ACIVS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10016. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48680-2_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48680-2_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48679-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48680-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics