Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary Teamwork on Sustainable Development—The Top Ten Strategies Based on Experience of Student Initiated Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Interdisciplinary teamwork has been identified to be a key factor for sustainable development (SD) at higher education institutions. However, there are several difficulties with the practical implementation. Existing student initiated projects (SIPs) may hold the key to possible solutions. This paper presents the top ten strategies for successful interdisciplinary teamwork on SD. It is based on qualitative analysis of expert interviews describing experiences in SIPs. Using the method of grounded theory, the data was collected, interviews were coded and central categories were identified. Besides finding common ground, it is crucial to invest time and patience, adapt professional languages, share information and educate oneself, built a friendship, differentiate between person and discipline and deploy a professional moderator. Additionally to elaborating the main strategies, this paper will discuss related literature. This paper will be useful to anyone interested in working in interdisciplinary teams on SD or wanting to enable others to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, D., Carpenter, J., & Dickinson, C. (2000). Interprofessional education for community mental health: Attitudes to community care and professional stereotypes. Social Work Education, 19, 565–583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M. (2013). Many roads lead to sustainability: A process-oriented analysis of change in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(2), 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J., Sterling, S., & Kagawa, F. (2013). Getting it together. Interdisciplinarity and sustainability in the higher education institution. Pedagogic Research Institute and Observatory (PedRIO), 4, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, M., Braßler, M., Orth, V., Riecke, M., Lopez, J. M., Perino, G., et al. (2016). Dies Oecologicus—how to foster a whole institutional change with a student-led project as tipping point for sustainable development at universities. In W. Leal & P. Pace (Eds.), Teaching education for sustainable development at university level (pp. 341–355). Hamburg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstädter, S., & Sonntag, K. H. (2016). Interdisciplinary collaboration—how to foster the dialogue across disciplinary borders? In B. Deml, P. Stock, R. Bruder, & C. Schlick (Eds.), Advances in ergonomic design of systems, products and processes. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. D. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32(4), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, L. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calisle, C., Cooper, H., & Watkins, C. (2004). Do none of you talk to each other? The challenges facing the implementation of interprofessional education. Medical Teacher, 26(6), 545–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. (2015). Do friends perform better?: Meta-analytic review of friendship and group task performance. Available at URL https://etd.ohiolink.edu/

  • Cook, K., & Stoecker, J. (2014). Healthcare student stereotypes: A systematic review with implications for interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education, 4(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, T., O’Donoghue, G., Butler, M., Blake, C., O’Sullivan, C., Smith, K., et al. (2012). A pilot study to evaluate the introduction of an interprofessional problem-based learning module. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresing, T., Pehl, T., & Schmieder, C. (2015). Manual (on) transcription transcription conventions, software guides and practical hints for qualitative researchers. Marburg: Self-published.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drupp, M. A., Esguerra, A., Keul, L., Löw Beer, D., Meisch, S., & Roosen-Runge, F. (2012). Change from below—student initiatives for universities in sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Sustainable development at universities: New horizons. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Scientific Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. L. (2005). Making interdisciplinary collaboration work. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escrigas, C. (2012). Foreword: Sustainability and knowledge in contemporary society. In J. Granados Sanchez & J. Fredi (Eds.), Higher education in the world 4: Higher education’s commitment to sustainability: From understanding to action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-Balas, D., Buckland, H., & de Mingo, M. (2009). Explorations on the University’s role in society for sustainable development through a systems transition approach. Case-study of the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC). Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1075–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (Forth ed.). London: SAGE Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, S., & Jean, P. (2003). Bridging the disciplines. Interdisciplinary discourse and faculty scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 119–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goelen, G., De Clercq, G., Huyghens, L., & Kerckhofs, E. (2006). Measuring the effect of interprofessional problem-based learning on the attitudes of undergraduate health care students. Medical Education, 40, 555–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfferich, C. (2011). Die Qualität qualitativer Daten: Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E., & Harder, M. K. (2015). What lies beneath the surface?: The hidden complexities of organizational change for sustainability in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopewood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, P. (2003). Smoothing the waters: Observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 33, 539–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2005). Redesigning for collaboration within higher education institutions: An exploration into the developmental process. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 831–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2005). Interdisciplinary teamwork: The dynamics of collaboration and integration. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & M. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R., Knight, D. B., & Bergom, I. M. (2013). Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 726–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho, W. (2010). Teaching sustainable development at university level: Current trends and future needs. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(4), 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letterman, M. R., & Dugan, K. B. (2004). Team teaching a cross-disciplinary honors course: Preparation and development. College Teaching, 55, 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human Resources For Health, 11, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, W. H. (2007). Decision making in interdisciplinary studies. In G. Morçöl (Ed.), Handbook of decision making. New York: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberg, G. (2009). Facilitating interdisciplinary work: Using quality assessment to create common ground. Higher Education, 57, 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olekalns, M., & Adair, W. L. (2013). Handbook of research on negotiation. Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pecukonis, E., Doyle, O., & Bliss, D. L. (2008). Reducing barriers to interprofessional training: Promoting interprofessional cultural competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(4), 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillis, Y. A., & Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L. A. (2001). Sustainability: An ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic. Ecological Economics, 37, 435–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repko, A. F. (2007). Integrating interdisciplinarity: How the theories of common ground and cognitive interdisciplinarity are informing the debate on interdisciplinary integration. Issues in Integrative Studies, 25, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repko, A. F. (2008). Interdisciplinary research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, R. W. (1996). Revealing socially constructed knowledge through quasi-structured interviews and grounded theory analysis. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 5(1–2), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., & Rizzo, A. (2005). Interdisciplinarity: An emergent or engineered process? In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. (2008). Towards a philosophy of interdisciplinarity—an attempt to provide a classification and clarification. Poiesis & Praxis, 5(1), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, P., Salvatori, P., & Guenter, O. (2003). An interprofessional problem-based learning course on rehabilitation issues in HIV. Medical Teacher, 25, 408–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spira, F. (2012). Sowing sprouts to engender greener universities: A qualitative study exploring the projects, challenges and strategies of sustainability student groups. The Maastricht Journal of Liberal Arts, 4, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Interdisciplinary problem-based learning: An alternative to traditional majors and minors. Liberal Education, 94(1), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. L. (2009). Building collective communication competence in interdisciplinary research teams. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(3), 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations Sustainable Development Summit 2015. United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warris, A., & Rafique, R. (2009). Trust in friendship: A comparative analysis of male and female university students. Bulletin of Education and Research, 31(2), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth, J., & Davis, J. R. (2002). Enhancing interdisciplinarity through team teaching. In C. Hayes (Ed.), Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching. CT: The Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirjam Braßler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Braßler, M., Block, M. (2017). Interdisciplinary Teamwork on Sustainable Development—The Top Ten Strategies Based on Experience of Student Initiated Projects. In: Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Alves, F., Molthan-Hill, P. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47877-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics